SMART: A light field image quality dataset

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Multimedia Systems, MMSys 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 374-379

  Paudyal, Pradip ^a   Olsson, Roger ^b   Sjöström, Mårten ^b   Battisti, Federica ^a   Carli, Marco ^a  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Content attributes; Light field imaging; Plenoptics; Quality of experience; SMART light field dataset

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

CONTENT ATTRIBUTES; DEPTH OF FIELD; KEY ATTRIBUTES; LIGHT FIELDS; PLENOPTICS; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); SELECTION CRITERIA; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 84973902374     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2910017.2910623     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. E. H. Adelson and J. Y. A. Wang. Single lens stereo with a plenoptic camera. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, (2), 1992.
2. F. Battisti, M. Carli, R. Olsson, P. Paudyal, and M. Sjostrom. SMART Light Field Image Dataset. http://www.comlab.uniroma3.it/SMART.html, 2016.
3. T. E. Bishop, S. Zanetti, and P. Favaro. Light field superresolution. In Computational Photography (ICCP), 2009 IEEE International Conference on, 2009.
4. C. Conti, L. D. Soares, and P. Nunes. Hevc-based 3d holoscopic video coding using self-similarity compensated prediction. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 42:59-78, 2016.
5. D. G. Dansereau, O. Pizarro, and S. B. Williams. Linear volumetric focus for light field cameras. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34(2):15, 2015.
6. C. Faloutsos, R. Barber, M. Flickner, J. Hafner, W. Niblack, D. Petkovic, and W. Equitz. Efficient and effective querying by image content. Journal of intelligent information systems, 3, 1994.
7. K. Fliegel and C. Timmerer. WG4 databases white paper v1. 5: QUALINET multimedia database enabling QoE evaluations and benchmarking. Prague/Klagenfurt, Czech Republic/Austria, 2013.
8. L. Gabriel. Epreuves reversibles. photographies integrals. Comptes-Rendus Academie des Sciences, 146, 1908.
9. A. Ghasemi, N. Afonso, and M. Vetterli. LCAV-31: a dataset for light field object recognition. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2014.
10. R. M. Haralick, K. Shanmugam, and I. H. Dinstein. Textural features for image classification. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, (6), 1973.
11. D. Hasler and S. E. Suesstrunk. Measuring colorfulness in natural images. In Electronic Imaging 2003, 2003.
12. ITS. Spatial information (SI) filter. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/resources/, 2015.
13. P. ITU-T RECOMMENDATION. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. 1999.
14. Y. Ke, X. Tang, and F. Jing. The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, 2006.
15. B. Keelan. Handbook of image quality: characterization and prediction. CRC Press, 2002.
16. B. W. Keelan and H. Urabe. ISO 20462: a psychophysical image quality measurement standard. In Electronic Imaging, 2003.
17. N. Li, J. Ye, Y. Ji, H. Ling, and J. Yu. Saliency detection on light field. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2014.
18. Y. Li, M. Sjostrom, R. Olsson, and U. Jennehag. Scalable coding of plenoptic images by using a sparse set and disparities. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 25(1):80-91, 2016.
19. I. Montilla, M. Puga, J. P. Luke, J. G. Marichal-Hernandez, and J. M. Rodriguez-Ramos. Design and laboratory results of a plenoptic objective: From 2D to 3D with a standard camera. Display Technology, Journal of, 11(1), 2015.
20. A. Mousnier and C. Vural, E.and Guillemot. Partial light field tomographic reconstruction from a fixed-camera focal stack. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.01903, 2015.
21. R. Ng, M. Levoy, M. Bredif, G. Duval, M. Horowitz, and P. Hanrahan. Light field photography with a hand-held plenoptic camera. Computer Science Technical Report CSTR, 2(11), 2005.
22. P. Paudyal, F. Battisti, and M. Carli. A study on the effects of quality of service parameters on perceived video quality. In Visual Information Processing (EUVIP), 2014 5th European Workshop on, pages 1-6. IEEE, 2014.
23. P. Paudyal, F. Battisti, and M. Carli. Impact of video content and transmission impairments on quality of experience. Multimedia Tools and Applications, pages 1-25, 2016.
24. M. Pedersen, N. Bonnier, J. Y. Hardeberg, and F. Albregtsen. Attributes of a new image quality model for color prints. In Color and Imaging Conference, volume 2009, 2009.
25. C. M. Privitera and L. W. Stark. Algorithms for defining visual regions-of-interest: Comparison with eye fixations. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 22(9):970-982, 2000.
26. R. Raghavendra, K. Raja, and C. Busch. Exploring the usefulness of light field camera for biometrics: An empirical study on face and iris recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (TIFS) (Accepted), 2016.
27. U. Rajashekar, L. K. Cormack, and A. C. Bovik. Image features that draw fixations. In Image Processing, 2003. ICIP 2003. Proceedings. 2003 International Conference on, volume 3, pages III-313. IEEE, 2003.
28. Raytrix. Raytrix light field camera. http://www.raytrix.de/, 2015.
29. M. Rerabek, L. Yuan, L. A. Authier, and T. Ebrahimi. [ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG1 contribution] EPFL Light-Field Image Dataset. Technical report, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG1, 2015.
30. V. Vaish and A. Adams. The (new) stanford light field archive. http:/lightfield.stanford.edu, 2008.
31. S. Wanner, S. Meister, and B. Goldluecke. Datasets and benchmarks for densely sampled 4D light fields. In Annual Workshop on Vision, Modeling and Visualization: VMV, 2013.
32. G. Wetzstein. Synthetic light field archive. http://web.media.mit.edu/-gordonw/SyntheticLightFields/, 2015.
33. S. Winkler. Analysis of public image and video databases for quality assessment. Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of, 6(6), 2012.