A groupwise multilinear correspondence optimization for 3D faces

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn 2015 International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 3604-3612

  Bolkart, Timo ^a   Wuhrer, Stefanie ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b INRIA RHÔNE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FACE RECOGNITION; NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD;

3D FACE DATABASE; EXPRESSION VARIATIONS; MINIMUM DESCRIPTION LENGTH APPROACH; MULTILINEAR MODELS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PARAMETER SPACES; QUASI-NEWTON METHODS; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84973889757     PISSN: 15505499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2015.411     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. V. Blanz and T. Vetter. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In SIGGRAPH, pages 187-194, 1999.
2. T. Bolkart and S. Wuhrer. 3D faces in motion: Fully automatic registration and statistical analysis. CVIU, 131:100-115, 2015.
3. T. Bolkart and S. Wuhrer. Multilinear mdl for 3D faces, 2015. http://multilinear-mdl. gforge. inria. fr/.
4. C. Bregler, A. Hertzmann, and H. Biermann. Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 690-696, 2000.
5. A. Brunton, T. Bolkart, and S. Wuhrer. Multilinear wavelets: A statistical shape space for human faces. In ECCV, pages 297-312, 2014.
6. O. Burghard, A. Berner, M. Wand, N. J. Mitra, H. Seidel, and R. Klein. Compact part-based shape spaces for dense correspondences. CoRR, abs/1311. 7535, 2013.
7. E. Candès, M. Wakin, and S. Boyd. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted l1 minimization. JFAA, 14(5-6):877-905, 2008.
8. J.-H. Chen, K. C. Zheng, and L. G. Shapiro. 3D point correspondence by minimum description length in feature space. In ECCV, pages 621-634, 2010.
9. R. Davies, C. Twining, T. Cootes, and C. Taylor. Building 3-d statistical shape models by direct optimization. MI, 29(4):961-981, 2010.
10. R. Davies, C. Twining, and C. Taylor. Statistical Models of Shape: Optimisation and Evaluation. Springer, 2008.
11. I. Dryden and K. Mardia. Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, 1998.
12. L. Eldén and B. Savas. A Newton-grassmann method for computing the best multilinear rank-(r1, r2, r3) approximation of a tensor. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 31(2):248-271, 2009.
13. S. T. Gollmer, M. Kirschner, T. M. Buzug, and S. Wesarg. Using image segmentation for evaluating 3D statistical shape models built with groupwise correspondence optimization. CVIU, 125(0):283-303, 2014.
14. J. Guo, X. Mei, and K. Tang. Automatic landmark annotation and dense correspondence registration for 3D human facial images. BMC Bioinf., 14(1), 2013.
15. C. J. Hillar and L.-H. Lim. Most tensor problems are NPhard. JACM, 60(6):45:1-45:39, 2013.
16. D. Hirshberg, M. Loper, E. Rachlin, and M. Black. Coregistration: Simultaneous alignment and modeling of articulated 3D shape. In ECCV, pages 242-255, 2012.
17. Y. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Fan, L. Yin, L. Seversky, J. Allen, T. Lei, and W. Dong. Reshaping 3D facial scans for facial appearance modeling and 3D facial expression analysis. IVC, 30(10):750-761, 2012.
18. M. Irani. Multi-frame correspondence estimation using subspace constraints. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 48(3):173-194, 2002.
19. L. Kobbelt, S. Campagna, J. Vorsatz, and H.-P. Seidel. Interactive multi-resolution modeling on arbitrary meshes. In SIGGRAPH, pages 105-114, 1998.
20. T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Rev., 51(3):455-500, 2009.
21. A. C. Kotcheff and C. J. Taylor. Automatic construction of eigenshape models by direct optimization. Med. Image Anal., 2(4):303-314, 1998.
22. L. D. Lathauwer. Signal processing based on multilinear algebra. PhD thesis, K. U. Leuven, Belgium, 1997.
23. D. Liu and J. Nocedal. On the limited memory method for large scale optimization. Math. Prog. : Series A and B, 45(3):503-528, 1989.
24. I. Mpiperis, S. Malassiotis, and M. G. Strintzis. Bilinear models for 3-D face and facial expression recognition. IFS, 3:498-511, 2008.
25. G. Pan, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Hu, X. Zheng, and Z. Wu. Establishing point correspondence of 3D faces via sparse facial deformable model. IP, 22(11):4170-4181, 2013.
26. G. Passalis, P. Perakis, T. Theoharis, and I. Kakadiaris. Using facial symmetry to handle pose variations in real-world 3D face recognition. PAMI, 33(10):1938-1951, 2011.
27. A. Salazar, S. Wuhrer, C. Shu, and F. Prieto. Fully automatic expression-invariant face correspondence. MVAP, pages 1-21, 2013.
28. A. Savran, N. Alyuz, H. Dibeklioglu, O. Celiktutan, B. Gökberk, B. Sankur, and L. Akarun. Bosphorus database for 3D face analysis. In BIOID, pages 47-56, 2008.
29. L. Torresani, D. Yang, E. Alexander, and C. Bregler. Tracking and modeling non-rigid objects with rank constraints. In CVPR, pages 493-500, 2001.
30. D. Vlasic, M. Brand, H. Pfister, and J. Popovíc. Face transfer with multilinear models. SIGGRAPH, 24(3):426-433, 2005.
31. F. Yang, L. Bourdev, J. Wang, E. Shechtman, and D. Metaxas. Facial expression editing in video using a temporally-smooth factorization. In CVPR, pages 861-868, 2012.
32. L. Yin, X. Wei, Y. Sun, J. Wang, and M. J. Rosato. A 3D facial expression database for facial behavior research. In FG, pages 211-216, 2006.