Understanding the performance of low power raspberry pi cloud for big data

Electronics (Switzerland)

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Hajji, Wajdi ^a   Tso, Fung Po ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Big data; Docker; Energy consumption; Internet of things; Micro Data Centre; Raspberry Pi; Raspberry Pi Cloud; Virtualisation

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FILE ORGANIZATION; INTERNET; INTERNET OF THINGS; SENSOR NETWORKS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DATA CENTRES; DOCKER; HADOOP DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEMS; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); REAL-TIME DATA PROCESSING; SINGLE BOARD COMPUTERS; VIRTUALISATION; VIRTUALISED ENVIRONMENTS;

BIG DATA;

EID: 84973885914     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20799292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/electronics5020029     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Atzori, L.; Iera, A.; Morabito, G. The internet of things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 2010, 54, 2787-2805.
2. Bonomi, F.; Milito, R.; Zhu, J.; Addepalli, S. Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 1st Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, Helsinki, Finland, 13-17 August 2012; pp. 13-16.
3. Choy, S.; Wong, B.; Simon, G.; Rosenberg, C. A hybrid edge-cloud architecture for reducing on-demand gaming latency. Multimed. Syst. 2014, 20, 503-519.
4. Yoneki, E. RasPiNET: Decentralised Communication and Sensing Platform with Satellite Connectivity. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM MobiCom Workshop on Challenged Networks, CHANTS’14, New York, NY, USA, 7 September 2014; pp. 81-84.
5. Raspberry Pi Foundation. Raspberry Pi 2, 2012. https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-2-model-b/ (accessed on 25 April 2016).
6. Cox, S.J.; Cox, J.T.; Boardman, R.P.; Johnston, S.J.; Scott, M.; O’brien, N.S. Iridis-pi: A low-cost, compact demonstration cluster. Clust. Comput. 2014, 17, 349-358.
7. Tso, F.P.; White, D.R.; Jouet, S.; Singer, J.; Pezaros, D.P. The Glasgow Raspberry Pi Cloud: A Scale Model for Cloud Computing Infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 8-11 July 2013; pp. 108-112
8. Abrahamsson, P.; Helmer, S.; Phaphoom, N.; Nicolodi, L.; Preda, N.; Miori, L.; Angriman, M.; Rikkila, J.; Wang, X.; Hamily, K.; et al. Affordable and Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing Clusters: The Bolzano Raspberry Pi Cloud Cluster Experiment. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), Bristol, UK, 2-5 December 2013; Volume 2, pp. 170-175.
9. Fernandes, S.L.; Bala, J.G. Low Power Affordable and Efficient Face Detection in the Presence of Various Noises and Blurring Effects on a Single-Board Computer. In Emerging ICT for Bridging the Future, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of the Computer Society of India (CSI) Volume 1, Hyderabad, India, 12-14 December 2014; Springer: CH-6330 Cham (ZG), Switzerland, 2015; pp. 119-127.
10. Jain, S.; Vaibhav, A.; Goyal, L. Raspberry Pi Based Interactive Home Automation System Through E-mail. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Optimization, Reliabilty, and Information Technology (ICROIT), Faridabad, India, 6-8 February 2014; pp. 277-280.
11. Vujović, V.; Maksimović, M. Raspberry Pi as a Wireless Sensor node: Performances and Constraints. In Proceedings of the 2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 26-30 May 2014; pp. 1013-1018.
12. Raspberry Pi Foundation. Raspberry PI 3 On Sale Now, 2016. https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/raspberry-pi-3-on-sale/ (accessed on 25 April 2016).
13. Anwar, A.; Krish, K.R.; Butt, A.R. On the Use of Microservers in Supporting Hadoop Applications. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), Madrid, Spain, 22-26 September 2014; pp. 66-74.
14. Cloutier, M.F.; Paradis, C.; Weaver, V.M. Design and Analysis of a 32-Bit Embedded High-Performance Cluster Optimized for Energy and Performance. In Proceedings of the 2014 Hardware-Software Co-Design for High Performance Computing (Co-HPC), New Orleans, LA, USA, 17 November 2014; pp. 1-8.
15. Morabito, R. A performance evaluation of container technologies on internet of things devices. 2016, arXiv:1603.02955. arXiv.org e-Print archive. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.02955 (accessed on 20 April 2016).
16. Schot, N. Feasibility of Raspberry Pi 2 based Micro Data Centers in Big Data Applications. In Proceedings of the 23th University of Twente Student Conference on IT, Enschede, The Netherlands, 22 June 2015.
17. Shi, J.; Qiu, Y.; Minhas, U.F.; Jiao, L.; Wang, C.; Reinwald, B.; Özcan, F. Clash of the Titans: MapReduce vs. Spark for Large Scale Data Analytics. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Kohala Coast, HI, USA, September 2015; Volume 8, pp. 2110-2121.
18. Mosberger, D.; Jin, T. Httperf-A tool for measuring web server performance. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 1998, 26, 31-37.
19. Greenberg, A.; Hamilton, J.R.; Jain, N.; Kandula, S.; Kim, C.; Lahiri, P.; Maltz, D.A.; Patel, P.; Sengupta, S. VL2: A Scalable and Flexible Data Center Network. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Volume 39, pp. 51-62.