A continuum of phonetic adaptation: Evaluating an incremental belief-updating model of recalibration and selective adaptation

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 605-610

  Kleinschmidt, Dave ^a   Jaeger, T Florian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b University of Rochester   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian models; Mechanical Turk; Phonetic adaptation; Recalibration; Selective adaptation; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS;

BAYESIAN MODELLING; BELIEF UPDATING; CUMULATIVE EXPOSURES; MECHANICAL TURKS; PHONETIC ADAPTATION; QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION; RECALIBRATIONS; SELECTIVE ADAPTATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TWO-POINT;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84973860184     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–29.
2. Clarke-Davidson, C. M., Luce, P. A., & Sawusch, J. R. (2008). Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias? Perception & Psychophysics, 70(4), 604–618.
3. Clayards, M. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Jacobs, R. a. (2008). Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues. Cognition, 108(3), 804–9.
4. Eimas, P. D., & Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 99–109.
5. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4), 1950–3.
6. Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2009). The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference. Psychological review, 116(4), 752–82.
7. Kleinschmidt, D., & Jaeger, T. F. (2011). A Bayesian belief updating model of phonetic recalibration and selective adaptation. In 2nd acl workshop on cognitive modeling and computational linguistics.
8. Kraljic, T., Brennan, S. E., & Samuel, A. G. (2008). Accommodating variation: dialects, idiolects, and speech processing. Cognition, 107(1), 54–81.
9. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 13(2), 262–8.
10. Maye, J., Aslin, R., & Tanenhaus, M. (2008). The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical Adaptation to a Novel Accent. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(3), 543–562.
11. Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82(3), B101–11.
12. Miller, J. L., Connine, C. M., Schermer, T. M., & Kluender, K. R. (1983). A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(6), 2124–33.
13. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 204–238.
14. Saldaña, H. M., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1994). Selective adaptation in speech perception using a compelling audiovisual adaptor. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(6), 3658–61.
15. Samuel, A. G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes. Perception & psychophysics, 31(4), 307–14.
16. Samuel, A. G. (1986). Red herring detectors and speech perception: in defense of selective adaptation. Cognitive psychology, 18(4), 452–99.
17. Sonderegger, M., & Yu, A. (2010). A rational account of perceptual compensation for coarticulation. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 375–380).
18. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 481–7.
19. Vroomen, J., Linden, S. van, Gelder, B. de, & Bertelson, P. (2007). Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses. Neuropsychologia, 45(3), 572–7.
20. Vroomen, J., Linden, S. van, Keetels, M., Gelder, B. de, & Bertelson, P. (2004). Selective adaptation and recalibration of auditory speech by lipread information: dissipation. Speech Communication, 44(1-4), 55–61.