Sats, achievement tests, and high-school class rank as predictors of college performance

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 1992, Pages 1047-1055

  Baron, Jonathan ^a   Norman, M Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973779753     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: 15523888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164492052004029     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Crouse, J. and Trusheim, D. (1988). The case against the SAT. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Dallal, G. E. (1988). LOGISTIC: A logistic regression program for the IBM PC. The American Statistician, 42, 272.
3. Dawes, R. M. (1975). Graduate admission variables and future success. Science, 187, 721-723.
4. Donlon, T. F. (Ed.). (1984). The College Board technical handbook for the Scholastic Aptitude Test and Achievement Tests. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
5. Educational Testing Service. (1948-1990). College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton, NJ: Author.
6. Elliott, R. and Strenta, A. C. (1990). Is the SAT redundant with high school record in college selection? Research and Development Update. New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
7. Strenta, A. C. and Elliott, R. (1987). Differential grading standards revisited. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 281-291.
8. Willingham, W. W., Lewis, C., Morgan, R., and Ramist, L. (1990). Predicting college grades: An analysis of institutional trends over two decades. New York and Princeton: The College Board and Educational Testing Service.