Why Triangulate?

Educational Researcher

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 13-17

  Mathison, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973746114     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X017002013     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Campbell DT Fiske DW Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix Psychological Bulletin 1959 56 2 81 105
2. Denzin NK The research act A theoretical introduction to sociological methods 1978 New York McGraw-Hill
3. Eisner EW The educational imagination 1979 New York MacMillan
4. Guba EG Lincoln YS Effective evaluation 1981 San Francisco Jossey-Bass
5. House ER Evaluating with validity 1980 Beverly Hills Sage
6. Jick TD Van Maanen J Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action Qualitative methods 1983 Beverly Hills Sage
7. Miles MB A mini-cross-site analysis American Behavioral Scientist 1982 26 1 121 132
8. Miles MB Huberman AM Qualitative data analysis 1984 Beverly Hills Sage
9. Patton MQ Qualitative evaluation methods 1980 Beverly Hills Sage
10. Scriven M Thomas LG Objectivity and subjectivity in educational research Philosophical redirection of educational research 1972 National Society for the Study of Education
11. Smith ML Kleine PL Williams DD Qualitative research and evaluation: Triangulation and multimethods reconsidered Naturalistic evaluation 1986 San Francisco Jossey-Bass (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 30)
12. Webb EJ Campbell DT Schwartz RD Sechrest L Unobtrusive measures 1966 Chicago Rand McNally