Understanding Science: Studies of Communication and Information

Communication Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 1989, Pages 600-614

  Griffith, Belver C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973731243     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009365089016005003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen, T. J. (1966). Performance of information channels in the transfer of technology. Industrial Management Review, 8, 87-98.
2. Bernal, J. D. (1948). Preliminary analysis of pilot questionnaire on the use of scientific literature. Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, Reports and Papers Submitted (Paper no. 46, pp. 587-637). London.
3. Crane, D. (1969). Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the “invisible college” hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 34(3), 335-352.
4. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. London: Pergamon Press.
6. Garvey, W. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1971). Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologist, 26, 349-362.
7. Griffith, B. C. (1979). Science literature: How faulty a mirror of science? Aslib Proceedings, 31, 381-391.
8. Griffith, B. C., & Mullins, N. C. (1972). Highly coherent groups in scientific change. Science, 177, 959-964.
9. Griffith, B. C., Small, H. G., Stonehill, J. A., & Dey, S. L. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures: II. Toward a micro- and macrostructure of science. Science Studies, 4, 339-365.
10. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Merton, R. K. (1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115-126.
12. Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review, 22(4), 635-659.
13. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science (N. W. Storer, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subjective side of science. New York: Elsevier.
15. Mullins, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The Phage Group and the development of molecular biology. Minerva, 10, 51-82.
16. Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1966). Scientists in organizations. New York: John Wiley.
17. Price, D. J. (1961). Science since Babylon. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science New York: Columbia University Press.
19. Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
20. Price, D. J. (1975). Science since Babylon (enl. ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Price, D. J. & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21, 1011-1018.
22. Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 24, 265-269.
24. Small, H. G. (1977). A cocitation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(5), 139-166.
25. Small, H. G., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literature: I. Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4, 17-40.