Objects, Attributes, and Visual Attention: Which, What, and Where

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 26-31

  Kanwisher, Nancy ^a   Driver, Jon ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973679846     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10767835     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. T.S. Collett, Binocular depth vision in arthropods. Trends in Neuroscience, 10, 1-2 (1987);
2. M.V. Srinivasan, How insects infer range from visual motion, in Visual Motion and its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze, F.A. Miles and J. Wallman, Eds. (Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, in press).
3. S. Rossel, Binocular stereopsis in an insect, Nature (Lond.), 302, 821-822 (1983).
4. G.A. Horridge, The evolution of visual processing and the construction of seeing systems, Proceedings of the Royal Society B (Lond.), 230, 279-292 (1987).
5. G.K. Wallace, Visual scanning in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria, Forskal, journal of Experimental Biology, 36, 512-525 (1959).
6. E.C. Sobel, The locust's use of motion parallax to measure distance, Journal of Comparative Physiology, 167, 579-588 (1990).
7. W.H. Kirchner and M.V. Srinivasan, Freely flying honeybees use image motion to estimate object distance, Naturwissenschaften, 76, 281-282 (1989).
8. M.V. Srinivasan, M. Lehrer, W. Kirchner, and S.W. Zhang, Range perception through apparent image speed in freely-flying honeybees, Visual Neuroscience, 6, 519-535 (1991).
9. M.V. Srinivasan, M. Lehrer, S.W. Zhang, and G.A. Horridge, How honeybees measure their distance from objects of unknown size, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 165, 605-613 (1989).
10. T.V. Papathomas, A. Corea, and B. Julesz, Two carriers for motion perception: Color and luminance, Vision Research, 31, 1883-1891 (1991).
11. M. Egelhaaf, K. Hausen, W. Reichardt, and C. Wehrhahn, Visual course control in flies relies on neuronal computation of object and background motion, Trends in Neuroscience, II, 351-358 (1988).
12. M.V. Srinivasan, M. Lehrer, and G.A. Horridge, Visual figure-ground discrimination in the honeybee: The role of motion parallax at boundaries, Proceedings of the Royal Society B (Lond.), 238, 331-350 (1990).
13. R. Wehner, Spatial vision in insects, in Hand book of Sensory Physiology (Vol. VII / 6C), H. Autrum, Ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981), pp. 287-616.
14. D. Kahneman and A. Treisman, Changing views of attention and automaticity, in Varieties of Attention, R. Parasuraman and D.R. Davies, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1984), pp. 29-61;
15. D. Kahneman and A. Henik, Perceptual organization and attention, in Perceptual Organization, M. Kubovy and J.R. Pomerantz, Eds. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981), pp. 181-211.
16. L.G. Ungerleider and M. Mishkin, Two cortical visual systems, in Analysis of Visual Behavior, D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, and R.J.W. Mansfield, Eds. (MIT Press, Boston, 1982), pp. 549-586;
17. J.V. Haxby, C.L. Grady, B. Horwitz, L.G. Ungerleider, M. Mishkin, R.E. Carson, P. Herscovitch, M.B. Schapiro, and S.I. Rapoport, Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing in human extrastriate cortex, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 1621-1625 (1991).
18. Z.W. Pylyshyn and R.W. Storm, Tracking of multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism, Spatial Vision, 3, 1-19 (1988).
19. D. Kahneman, A. Treisman, and B.J. Gibbs, The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information, Cognitive Psychology (in press).
20. A. Treisman, Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture, Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237 (1988).
21. J.T. Mordkoff, Visual features are bound to objects, not locations, paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York (1991, April).
22. N. Kanwisher, Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation, Cognition, 27, 117-143 (1987);
23. N. Kanwisher, Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 404-421 (1991).
24. A. Treisman and H. Schmidt, Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects, Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141 (1982).
25. M.I. Posner and Y. Cohen, Components of visual orienting, in Attention and Performance X.H. Bouma and D.G. Bouwhuis, Eds. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, Nj, 1984), pp. 531-556.
26. R. Klein, Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search, Nature, 334, 430-431 (1988).
27. J.M. Wolfe and C.W. Pokorny, Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate, Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357-362 (1990).
28. S.P. Tipper, J. Driver, and B. Weaver, Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention, Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298 (1991).
29. O. Hikosaka, S. Miyauchi, and S. Shimojo, Facal visual attention produces motion sensation in lines, paper presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology conference, Sarasota, FL (1991, April).
30. S.P. Tipper, J. Brehaut, and J. Driver. Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action, journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504 (1990).
31. P. McLeod, J. Driver, and J. Crisp, Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel, Nature, 332, 154-155(1988).
32. J. Driver and G.C. Baylis, Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down, journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448-456 (1989).
33. G.C. Baylis, J. Driver, and P. McLeod, Motion and proximity constrain miscombinations of color and form, Perception (in press)
34. L.C. Robertson and M.R. Lamb, Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization, Cognitive Psychology, 23, 299-330 (1991).
35. W. Prinzmetal, Principles of feature integration in visual perception, Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 330-340 (1981).
36. J. Duncan, Selective attention and the organization of visual information, journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517 (1984).
37. R.J. Watt, Visual Processing: Computational, Psychophysical, and Cognitive Research (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988).
38. G.C. Baylis and J. Driver, Visual attention and objects Evidence for the hierarchical coding of position, manuscript submitted for publication (1991).
39. R. Calvanio, P.N. Petrone, and D.N. Levine, Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centered and body-centered, Neurology, 37, 1179-1183 (1987);
40. M. Farah, J.L. Brunn, A.B. Wong, M.A. Wallace, and P.A. Carpenter, Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome, Neuropsychology, 28, 335-347 (1990);
41. A. Carramazza and A. Hillis, Internal spatial representation of written words: Evidence from unilateral neglect, Nature. 346, 267-269 (1990).
42. G. Gainotti, P. Messerli, and R. Tissot, Quantitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to latéralisation of cerebral lesions, journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 35, 545-550 (1972);
43. J. Driver and P.W. Halligan, Can visual neglect operate in object-centered coordinates? An affirmative single-case study, Cognitive Neuropsychology (in press).
44. J. Driver, G.C. Baylis, and R. Rafal, Extinction following unilateral parietal damage as a failure in making tokens for extracted visual types, unpublished manuscript (1991).
45. J. Baizer, L. Ungerleider, and R. Desimone, Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques, journal of Neuroscience, 11, 168-190 (1991);
46. D. Boussaoud, L. Ungerleider and R. Desimone, Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque, Journal of Comparative Neurology, 296, 462-495 (1990).
47. C. Von Der Malsburg, The Correlation Theory of Brain Function (Internal Report 81-2) (Max Plank Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Neurobiology, Coettingen, Germany, 1981);
48. F. Crick and C. Koch, Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness, Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263-275 (1990).
49. C.M. Gray, P. Konig, A.K. Engel, and W. Singer, Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties, Nature, 338, 334-337 (1989).
50. R. Baillargeon, Object permanence in 3.5 and 4.5-month-old infants, Developmental Psychology, 23, 655-664(1987);
51. R. Baillargeon, Young infants' reasoning about the physical and spatial properties of a hidden object, Cognitive Development, 2, 179-200 (1987).