Intractable conflicts and moral objectivity: A dialogical, problem-based approach

Inquiry (United Kingdom)

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 229-257

  Rehg, William ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973613309     PISSN: 0020174X     EISSN: 15023923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002017499321561     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988).
2. Michael Smith, ‘Realism’, in P. Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991; 1993), pp. 399-410.
3. Peter Railton, ‘Moral Realism’, in S. Darwall, A. Gibbard, and P. Railton (eds), Moral Discourse and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 137-163.
4. Karl-Otto Apel, Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, trans. G. Adey and D. Frisby (London: Routledge, 1980).
5. Jürgen Habermas, ‘What Is Universal Pragmatics?’, in Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. T. McCarthy (Boston: Beacon, 1979), pp. 1-68.
6. R. M. Hare, Freedom and Reason (Oxford: Clarendon, 1963).
7. David Wiggins, ‘Universalizability, Impartiality, Truth’, in Needs, Values, Truth (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), pp. 59-86.
8. Jürgen Habermas, ‘Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification’, in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990), pp. 43-115, esp. pp. 67-68.
9. Lawrence Kohlberg, Dwight R. Boyd, and Charles Levine, ‘The Return of Stage 6: Its Principle and Moral Point of View’, in T. E. Wren (ed.), The Moral Domain (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990), pp. 151-81.
10. Jürgen Habermas, ‘Remarks on Discourse Ethics’, in Justification and Application, trans. C. P. Cronin (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993), pp. 26-27.
11. Habermas, ‘Eine genealogische Betrachtung zum kognitiven Gehalt der Moral’, in Die Einbeziehung des Anderen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1996), pp. 15, 53-55.
12. Joseph Heath, ‘The Problem of Foundationalism in Habermas' s Discourse Ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 21 (1995), pp. 80.
13. David Wiggins, ‘Objective and Subjective in Ethics, with Two Postscripts on Truth’, in B. Hooker (ed.), Truth in Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), pp. 35-50.
14. Robert Alexy, ‘A Theory of Practical Discourse’, in S. Benhabib and F. Dallmayr (eds), The Communicative Ethics Controversy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990), pp. 151-190.
15. Logi Gunnarsson, ‘Diskurs ohne Konsens’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 42 (1994), pp. 313-326.
16. Thomas McCarthy, ‘Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytical Distinctions’, Cardozo Law Review 17 (1996), pp. 1083-1125.
17. Seyla Benhabib, Critique, Norm, and Utopia (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986).
18. Maeve Cooke, Language and Reason (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994), pp. 153-155, 162.
19. Amy Gutmann, ‘The Challenge of Multiculturalism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993), pp. 171-206.
20. L. Kriesberg, T. A. Northrup, and S. J. Thorson (eds), Intractable Conflicts and Their Transformation (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1989), pp. 1-10.
21. James F. Palmer and Richard C. Smardon, ‘Measuring Human Values Associated with Wetlands’, in Kriesberg et al. (eds), Intractable Conflicts, pp. 25-40 and 156-79, resp.
22. Georgia Warnke, ‘Discourse Ethics and the Feminist Dilemmas of Difference,’ in J. Meehan (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 247-261.
23. Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson, Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), ch. 1.
24. David B. Wong, ‘Coping with Moral Conflict and Ambiguity’, Ethics 102 (1992), pp. 763-784.
25. John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993; 1996), pp. 54-58.
26. Martin Benjamin, Splitting the Difference (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1990), pp. 154-70.
27. William Rehg, ‘The Place of Consensus in Democratic Legitimation: A Recommendation’, Rechtstheorie 27 (1996), pp. 461-473.
28. Arne Johan Vetlesen, Perception, Empathy, and Judgment (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994).
29. Jürgen Habermas, ‘On the Pragmatic, the Ethical, and the Moral Employments of Practical Reason’, Justification and Application, pp. 1-17.
30. Karl-Otto Apel, ‘Die Konflikte unserer Zeit und das Erfordernis einer ethisch-politischen Grundorientierung’, Diskurs und Verantwortung, pp. 15-22.
31. Palmer and Smardon, ‘Measuring Human Values Associated with Wetlands’, in Kriesberg et al. (eds), Intractable Conflicts, pp. 156-179.
32. Caroline Whitbeck, ‘Ethics as Design: Doing Justice to Moral Problems’, Hastings Center Report 26/3 (May-June 1996), pp. 9-16.
33. Albrecht Wellmer, ‘Ethics and Dialogue: Elements of Moral Judgement in Kant and Discourse Ethics,’ The Persistence of Modernity, trans. D. Midgley (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991), pp. 203-11.
34. Matthias Kettner, ‘Warum es Anwendungsfragen, aber keine ‘Anwendungsdiskurse’ gibt’, Annual Review of Law and Ethics 1 (1993), pp. 365-378.
35. Stephen Darwall, ‘Two Forms of Respect’, Ethics 88 (1977), pp. 36-49.
36. Gunnar Skirbekk, ‘Ethical Gradualism and Discourse Ethics: Paradigmatic and Gradualist Moral Thinking’, in Rationality and Modernity (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1993), pp. 191-214.
37. Hans-Joachim Hohn, ‘Sozialethik im Diskurs: Skizzen zum Gespräch zwischen Diskursethik und Katholischer Soziallehre’, in E. Arens (ed.), Habermas und die Theologie (Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1989), pp. 179-198, e sp. pp. 19 3 ff.
38. David Estlund, ‘The Persistent Puzzle of the Minority Democrat’, American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1989), pp. 143-151.