Open innovation’s answer to the challenges of patent overpropertization

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 730-736

  Hill, W Wesley ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973389650     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17471540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpu116     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. H Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business School Press Cambridge, MA 2003).
2. O Gassmann, E Enkel and H Chesbrough, ‘The Future of Open Innovation’ (2010) 40(3) R&D Management 213, 213–214.
3. G Dutfield and U Suthersanen, Global Intellectual Property Law (Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK 2008) 48.
4. M Mattioli, ‘Communities of Innovation’ (2012) 106 NWULR 103, 105–108.
5. RP Merges, ‘The Trouble With Trolls: Innovation, Rent-Seeking, and Patent Law Reform’ (2009) 24 Berkeley Tech LJ 1583, 1584.
6. C Shapiro, ‘Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting’ [2000] 1 Innovation Policy and the Economy 119, 119–22.
7. A Nagdev et al, ‘IP as Venture Capital: A Case Study of Microsoft IP Ventures’ (2008) 8(2) Wake Forest IPLJ 197, 199.
8. H Chesbrough and AK Crowther, ‘Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries’ (2006) 36(3) R&D Management 229, 229;
9. E Enkel, O Gassman and H Chesbrough, ‘Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon’ (2009) 39(4) R&D Management 311, 312.
10. 0l L 935, 952–62.
11. Athanaeus, The Deipnosophists, or, Banquet of the Learned of Athanaeus, vol 3 (CD Yong trans, Henry G Bohn London 1754) 835;
12. Guilio Mandich, ‘Venetian Patents (1450–1550)’ (1948) 30 J Pat Off Soc’y 166, 176–77;
13. KJ Arrow, ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’ in National Bureau of Economic Research (ed), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ 1962) 609, 615.
14. Chiron Corp v Organon Teknika Ltd (No 10) [1995] FSR 325, 332.
15. J Boyle, ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’ (2003) 66 Law and Contemp Prob 33, 37–40.
16. R Millien and R Laurie, ‘Meet the Middlemen’ (February/March 2008) Intellectual Asset Management 53.
17. JF McDonough III, ‘The Myth of the Patent Troll: An Alternative View of the Function of Patent Dealers in an Idea Economy’ (2006) 56 Emory LJ 189, 189.
18. ‘Reduce Patent Litigation Costs’, RPX Corporation, http://www.rpxcorp.com (last accessed 11 April 2013).
19. www.inc.com/kris-frieswick/is-this-whatpatent-infringement-insurance-looks-like.html
20. JM Barnett, ‘Property as Process: How Innovation Markets Select Innovation Regimes’ (2009) 119 Yale LJ 384).
21. RP Merges, ‘Contracting Into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations’ (1996) 84(5) CLR 1293.
22. Burstein, ‘Exchanging Information Without Intellectual Property’ (2012) 91 Tex L Rev 227, 232–33.
23. J Dubiansky, ‘The Role of Patents in Fostering Open Innovation’ (2006) 11(7) Va JL Tech, para 73.
24. A Arora, ‘Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and the Market for Know-How’ (1995) 4 Economics of Innovation and New Technology 41, 44–45.
25. JD Wolpert, ‘Breaking Out of the Innovation Box’ (2002) 80(8) Harv Bus Rev 76, 81.