Zeta sperm selection improves pregnancy rate and alters sex ratio in male factor infertility patients: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial

International Journal of Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 253-260

  Esfahani, Mohammad Hossein Nasr ^a,b   Deemeh, Mohammad Reza ^b   Tavalaee, Marziyeh ^a   Sekhavati, Mohammad Hadi ^c   Gourabi, Hamid ^a  

^a ROYAN INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE   (Iran)

^b ISFAHAN FERTILITY AND INFERTILITY CENTER   (Iran)

^c FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

Author keywords

Density gradient centrifugation; Embryo quality; Pregnancy; Sex ratio; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

AMELOGENIN GENE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EMBRYO; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEX RATIO; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SRY GENE;

EID: 84973303787     PISSN: 2008076X     EISSN: 20080778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992; 340(8810): 17-18.
2. Celik-Ozenci C, Jakab A, Kovacs T, Catalanotti J, Demir R, Bray-Ward P, et al. Sperm selection for ICSI: shape properties do not predict the absence or presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(9): 2052-2059.
3. Avendaño C, Franchi A, Taylor S, Morshedi M, Bocca S, Oehninger S. Fragmentation of DNA in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(4): 1077-1084.
4. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Deemeh MR, Tavalaee M. New era in sperm selection for ICSI. Int J Androl. 2012; 35(4): 475-484
5. Simon L, Ge SQ, Carrell DT. Sperm selection based on electrostatic charge. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 927: 269-278
6. Chan PJ, Jacobson JD, Corselli JU, Patton WC. A simple zeta method for sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(2): 481-486.
7. Razavi SH, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Deemeh MR, Shayesteh M, Tavalaee M. Evaluation of zeta and HA-binding methods for selection of spermatozoa with normal morphology, protamine content and DNA integrity. Andrologia. 2010; 42(1): 13-19.
8. Kirchhoff C, Hale G. Cell-to-cell transfer of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins during sperm maturation. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996; 2(3): 177-184
9. Kheirollahi-Kouhestani M, Razavi S, Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Mardani M, Moshtaghian J, et al. Selection of sperm based on combined density gradient and Zeta method may improve ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(10): 2409-24016.
10. Ishijima SA, Okuno M, Mohri H. Zeta potential of human X- and Y-bearing sperm. Int J Androl. 1991; 14(5): 340-347.
11. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010; 1-271.
12. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salz-mann J, et al. Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10(9): 2427-2431.
13. Terriou P, Giorgetti C, Hans E, Salzmann J, Charles O, Cignetti L, et al. Relationship between even early cleavage and day 2 embryo score and assessment of their predictive value for pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007; 14(3): 294-299.
14. Aleahmad F, Gourabi H, Zeinali B, Kazemi Ashtiani S, Ba-harvand H. Separation of X- and Y-bearing human spermatozoa by sperm isolation medium gradients evaluated by FISH. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 18(4): 475-478.
15. Ainsworth CJ, Nixon B, Aitken RJ. The electrophoretic separation of spermatozoa: an analysis of genotype, surface carbohydrate composition and potential for capacitation. Int J Androl. 2011; 34(5): e422-434.
16. Gubbay J, Collignon J, Koopman P, Capel B, Economou A, Münsterberg A, et al. A gene mapping to the sex-deter-mining region of the mouse Y chromosome is a member of a novel family of embryonically expressed genes. Nature. 1990; 346(6281): 245-250.
17. Acharyya S, Kanjilal S, Bhattacharyya AK. Does human sperm nuclear DNA integrity affect embryo quality? Indian J Exp Biol. 2005; 43(11): 1016-1022.
18. Zini A, Meriano J, Kader K, Jarvi K, Laskin CA, Cadesky K. Potential adverse effect of sperm DNA damage on embryo quality after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(12): 3476-3480.
19. Simon L, Murphy K, Shamsi MB, Liu L, Emery B, Aston KI, et al. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(11): 2402-2412.
20. Avendaño C, Franchi A, Duran H, Oehninger S. DNA fragmentation of normal spermatozoa negatively impacts embryo quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(2): 549-557.
21. Fleming SD, Ilad RS, Griffin AM, Wu Y, Ong KJ, Smith HC, et al. Prospective controlled trial of an electrophoretic method of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction: comparison with density gradient centrifugation. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(12): 2646-2651.
22. Simon L, Murphy K, Aston KI, Emery BR, Hotaling JM, Carrell DT. Micro-electrophoresis: a noninvasive method of sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(2): 361-366.
23. Tan TY, Lau SK, Loh SF, Tan HH. Female ageing and re-productive outcome in assisted reproduction cycles. Singapore Med J. 2014; 55(6): 305-303.
24. Wissing ML, Bjerge MR, Olesen AI, Hoest T, Mikkelsen AL. Impact of PCOS on early embryo cleavage kinetics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 28(4): 508-514.
25. Briggs R, Kovacs G, MacLachlan V, Motteram C, Baker HW. Can you ever collect too many oocytes? Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(1): 81-87.
26. Zarei-Kheirabadi M, Shayegan Nia E, Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Arabi M, Forouzanfar M, et al. Evaluation of ubiquitin and annexin V in sperm population selected based on density gradient centrifugation and zeta potential (DGC-Zeta). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012; 29(4): 365-371.
27. Pérez-Crespo M, Pintado B, Gutiérrez-Adán A. Scrotal heat stress effects on sperm viability, sperm DNA integrity, and the offspring sex ratio in mice. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008; 75(1): 40-47.
28. Kovacs P. Embryo selection: the role of time-lapse monitoring. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014; 12: 124.
29. Tarín JJ, García-Pérez MA, Hermenegildo C, Cano A. Changes in sex ratio from fertilization to birth in assisted-reproductive-treatment cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014; 12: 56.