Permanent Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Use After Acute Stabilization for Cardiogenic Shock in Acute Myocardial Infarction

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2017, Pages e13-e17

  Chou, Josephine ^a   Bermudez, Christian ^b   Kormos, Robert ^c   Teuteberg, Jeffrey ^c  

^a BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

acute MI; cardiogenic shock; continuous flow LVAD

Indexed keywords

PATIENT TREATMENT; STABILIZATION;

ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; CARDIOGENIC SHOCKS; CONTINUOUS FLOWS; EMBOLIC STROKES; HEMORRHAGIC STROKE; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; MECHANICAL SUPPORT; TEMPORARY SUPPORT;

LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES;

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; HEPARIN; WARFARIN;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; ARTICLE; ASSISTED CIRCULATION; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CARDIOEMBOLIC STROKE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTINUOUS FLOW LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; DISEASE REGISTRY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEART TAMPONADE; HEMATOTHORAX; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MALE; MEDIASTINITIS; METHICILLIN SUSCEPTIBLE STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PANCYTOPENIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; STAPHYLOCOCCAL BACTEREMIA; SURVIVAL RATE; ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART INFARCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC;

EID: 84973300832     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: 1538943X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000398     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F, et al: Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 14: 1287-1296, 2012.
2. Garatti A, Russo C, Lanfranconi M, et al: Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: an experimental and clinical review. ASAIO J 53: 278-287, 2007.
3. Tayara W, Starling R, Yamani M, et al: Improved survival after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with circulatory support and transplantation: Comparing aggressive intervention with conservative treatment. J Heart Lung Transplant 25: 504-509, 2006.
4. Kirklin J, Naftel D, Kormos R, et al: Sixth INTERMACS annual report: A 10,000-patient database. J Heart Lung Transplant 33: 555-564, 2014.
5. Frazier OH, Rose EA, Macmanus Q, et al: Multicenter clinical evaluation of the Heart Mate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg 53: 1080-1090, 1992.
6. Park S, Nguyen D, Bank A, et al: Left ventricular assist device bridge therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg 69: 1146-1151, 2000.
7. Leshnower B, Gleason T, O'Hara M, et al: Safety and efficacy of left ventricular assist device support in postmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock. Ann Thorac Surg 81: 1365-1371, 2006.
8. Attisani M, Centrofanti P, La Torre M, et al: Safety and effectiveness of low dosing of double antiplatlet therapy during long term ventricular support with the INCOR system. J Art Organs 13: 202-206, 2010.