Effective Schools and School Improvement: A Comparative Analysis of Two Lines of Inquiry

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1984, Pages 41-68

  Clark, David L ^a   Lotto, Linda S ^b   Astuto, Terry A ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973218325     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: 15523519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X84020003004     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. G. Weber, Inner-City Children Can Be Taught To Read: Four Successful Schools, Occasional Papers, Number Eighteen (Washington, D. C.: Council for Basic Education, 1971), p. 1.
2. H. A. Averch, S. J. Carroll, T. S. Donaldson, H. J. Kiesling, and J. Pincus, How Effective is Schooling? A Critical Review and Synthesis of Research Findings (Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation, 1972), p. iii.
3. J. S. Coleman, Equality of Educational Opportunity (Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1966), p. 22.
4. R. J. Mumane, “Interpreting the Evidence on School Effectiveness,” Teachers College Record 83, 1 (Fall 1981).
5. R. Edmonds, “Effective Schools for the Urban Poor,” Educational Leadership 37, 1 (October 1979): 16.
6. D. MacKenzie, “Research for School Improvement: An Appraisal of Some Recent Trends,” Educational Researcher 12, 4 (April 1983).
7. P. R. Mort and F. G. Cornell, American Schools in Transition (New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1941).
8. A. M. Huberman and D. P. Crandall, People, Policies, and Practices: Examining the Chain of Social Improvement, Volume IX: Implications for Action (Andover, Mass.: The Network, Inc., 1982), p. 80.
9. M. Fullan, The Meaning of Educational Change (New York: Teachers College Press, 1982), p. 41.
10. P. Berman and M. McLaughlin, Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Volume IV: The Findings in Review (Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation, 1975).
11. A. M. Huberman and M. B. Miles, People, Policies, and Practices: Examining the Chain of School Improvement, Volume IV: Innovation Up Close: A Field Study in Twelve School Settings (Andover, Mass.: The Network, Inc., 1982), p. 440.
12. Fullan, The Meaning of Educational Change, p. 82.
13. S. F. Loucks, J. E. Bauchner, D. P. Crandall, W. H. Schmidt, and J. W. Eiseman, People, Policies, and Practices: Examining die Chain of School Improvement, Volume I: Setting the Stage for a Study of School Improvement (Andover, Mass.: The Network, Inc., 1982).
14. Huberman and Crandall, Implications for Action, p. 82.
15. Loucks et al., Setting the Stage, p. 42.
16. Berman and McLaughlin, Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Volume VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation (Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation, 1977), p. 124.
17. K. S. Louis and S. Rosenblum, Linking R & D with Schools: A Program and Its Implications for Dissemination (Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Education, 1981).
18. Loucks et al., Setting the Stage, p. 42.
19. Fullan, The Meaning of Educational Change. Chapter 7: Berman and McLaughlin, Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation, p. 136.
20. Fullan, The Meaning of Educational Change, p. 136.
21. R. G. Havelock, Planning for Innovation through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, 1969).
22. P. L. Cox, “Complementary Roles in Successful Change,” Educational Leadership 41, 3 (November 1983): 12.
23. Huberman and Crandall, Implications for Action, pp. 55, 82-83.
24. Fullan, The Meaning of Educational Change, p. 194.
25. Loucks et al., Setting the Stage, p. 153.
26. D. A. Paul, “Change Processes at the Elementary, Secondary, and Post-Secondary Levels of Education,” in Linking Processes in Educational Improvement, N. Nash and J. Culbertson, eds. (Columbus, Ohio: University Council for Educational Administration, 1977), p. 52.
27. Berman and McLaughlin, Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation, p. 88.
28. P. D. Hood, The Role of Linking Agents in School Improvement: A Review, Analysis, and Synthesis of Recent studies (San Francisco: Far West Laboratory, December 1982), pp. 3.38, 3.43-3.45, 4.61.
29. Huberman and Crandall, Implications for Action, p. 76.
30. Fullan, The Meaning of Educational Change, p. 49.
31. P. Berman, “Educational Change: An Implementation Paradigm,” in Improving Schools: Using What We Know, R. Lehming and M. Kane, eds. (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1981).
32. D. Mackenzie, “Research for School Improvement: An Appraisal of Some Recent Trends,” Educational Researcher 12, 4 (April 1983).
33. S. C. Purkey and M. S. Smith, Effective Schools: A Review (Madison, Wis.: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, School of Education, University of Wisconsin, September 1982).
34. J. H. Ralph and J. Fennessey, “Science or Reform: Some Questions About the Effective Schools Model,” Phi Delta Kappan 64, 10 (June 1983): 689-694.
35. B. Rowan, S. T. Bossert, and D. C. Dwyer, “Research on Effective Schools: A Cautionary Note,” Educational Researcher 12, 4 (April 1983): 24-31.
36. M. Rutter, B. Maugham, P. Mortimer, J. Ouston, and A. Smith, Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979).
37. Ralph and Fennessey, “Science or Reform,” pp. 692–693.
38. Weber, Inner City Children Can Be Taught To Read.
39. P. Berman, Thinking About Implementation Design: Matching Strategies to Situations(Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation, 1978).
40. M. Scriven, “Prose and Cons About Goal-Free Evaluation,” Evaluation Comment (December 1972).
41. J. G. March, “Model Bias in Social Action,” Review of Educational Research 42, 4 (Fall 1972): 413-429.
42. K. E. Weick, The Social Psychology of Organizing (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979), pp. 245-246.
43. T. Peters and R. Waterman, In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1982), pp. 119-155.
44. Weick, The Social Psychology of Organizing, p. 77.
45. E. R. House, “Three Perspectives on Innovation: Technological, Political, and Cultural,” in Improving Schools: Using What We Know, R. Lehming and M. Kane, eds. (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1981).
46. Fullan, The Meaning of Educational Change.
47. Ralph and Fennessey, “Science or Reform,” p. 693.
48. Peters and Waterman, In Search of Excellence.