Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-Set Revisited

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1988, Pages 725-748

  Collins, H M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973215555     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: 14603659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030631288018004006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ‘Certainty and the Public Understanding of Science: Science on Television’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17 (1987), 689–714.
2. D. N. McCloskey, The Rhetoric of Economics (Brighton, Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books, 1986).
3. S. Shapin and S. Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985).
4. M. Hesse, The Structure of Scientific Inference (London: Macmillan, 1974).
5. H. M. Collins, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (London & Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985).
6. S. Schaffer, ‘Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century’, History of Science, Vol. 21 (1983), 1–43.
7. C. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969).
8. S. Shapin, ‘The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England’, Isis, Vol. 79 (September 1988).
9. D. Gooding, ‘In Nature's School: Faraday as an Experimentalist’, in Gooding and F. A. James (eds), Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791–1876 (London: Macmillan, 1985), 105–35, at 108.
10. Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca, Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791–1876, note 6, Chapter 1.
11. H. M. Collins (ed.), Knowledge and Controversy: Studies of Modern Natural Science, Special Issue of Social Studies of Science, Vol. 11, No. 1 (February 1981), 3–158.
12. Collins, Knowledge and Controversy: Studies of Modern Natural Science, note 3.
13. P. Atkinson and S. Delamont, ‘Mock-Ups and Cock-Ups: The Stage-Management of Guided Discovery Instruction’, in P. Woods and M. Hammersley (eds), School Experience: Explorations in the Sociology of Education (London: Croom Helm, 1977), 87–108.
14. Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca, School Experience: Explorations in the Sociology of Education, note 6, 47–48 (stress in original).
15. T. J. Pinch, ‘Towards an Analysis of Scientific Observation: The Externality and Evidential Significance of Observation Reports in Physics’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 15 (1985), 3–36.
16. G. D. L. Travis, ‘Replicating Replication?: Aspects of the Social Construction of Learning in Planarian Worms’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 11 (1981), 11–32.
17. Collins, Social Studies of Science, note 1.
18. J. Farley and G. L. Geison, ‘Science, Politics and Spontaneous Generation in France: The Pasteur Pouchet Debate’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Vol. 48 (1974), 161–98.
19. H. M. Collins (ed.), Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Sourcebook (Bath: Bath University Press, 1982), 1–38.
20. H. M. Collins and T. J. Pinch, Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982).
21. H. M. Collins, ‘The Meaning of Lies: Accounts of Action and Participatory Research’, in G. N. Gilbert and P. Abel (eds), Accounts and Action (Aldershot: Gower, 1983), 69–76.
22. Michael L. Yaffee, ‘Antimisting Fuel Research and Development for Commercial Aircraft — Final Summary Report’, April 1986 (Dot/FAA/CT-86/7).
23. Routing Out, No. 17 (Winter 1984/85), 28–29.
24. T. J. Pinch and H. M. Collins, ‘Private Science and Public Knowledge: The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the Claims of the Paranormal and Its Use of the Literature’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 14 (1984), 521–46.
25. Shapin & Schaffer, Social Studies of Science, note 2.
26. I. Langmuir, ‘Pathological Science’, General Electric R&D Center Report, Number 68-C-035 (1953) (revised version by R. N. Hall, New York, 1968).
27. R. K. Merton, ‘Paradigm for a Sociology of Knowledge’, as reprinted in his The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1973), 7–40.
28. T. F. Gieryn, ‘Safe Science and Risky Science: Competition for the Chair of Logic and Metaphysics at Edinburgh, 1836’, paper presented to Conference on ‘Argument in Science: New Sociologies of Science/Rhetoric of Inquiry’, Iowa City, 9–11 October 1987.
29. R. Lewontin and R. Levins, ‘The Problem of Lysenkoism’, in H. Rose and S. Rose (eds), The Radicalisation of Science (London: Macmillan, 1976), 32–64.
30. D. MacKenzie, ‘Missile Accuracy: A Case Study in the Social Processes of Technological Change’, in W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes and T. J. Pinch (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987), 195–222.
31. Collins, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, note 3, 162–63.
32. Collins & Pinch, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, note. 20.
33. Collins, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, note 1.