The irrelevance of distribution for the syllogism

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 433-449

  Murphree, Wallace A ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84972528302     PISSN: 00294527     EISSN: 19390726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1040511349     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Barker, S., The Elements of Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.
2. Englebretsen, G., “Defending Distribution,” Dialogos, vol. 45 (1985), pp. 157-159.
3. Geach, P., Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories, Cornell University Press, New York, 1962.
4. Geach, P., “The Doctrine of Distribution,” Mind, vol. 65 (1956), pp. 67-74.
5. Geach, P., “Distribution: A Last Word,” Philosophical Review, vol. 71 (1960), pp. 396-398.
6. Johnstone, H., “Pairs of Negative Syllogistic Premises Yielding Conclusions,” Logique et analyse, vol. 85-86 (1979), pp. 109-110.
7. Katz, B., and A. Martinich, “The Distribution of Terms,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Vol. 18 (1976), pp. 279-283.
8. Kelley, D., The Art of Reasoning, Norton, New York, 1990.
9. Murphree, W., Numerically Exceptive Logic: A Reduction of the Classical Syllogism, Peter Lang, New York, 1991.
10. Sommers, F., “Distribution Matters,” Mind, vol. 84 (1975), pp. 27-46.
11. Toms, E., “Mr. Geach on Distribution,” Mind, vol. 74 (1965), pp. 428-431.
12. Williamson, C., “Traditional Logic as the Logic of Distribution Values,” Logique et analyse, vol. 14 (1971), pp. 729-746.