메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1975, Pages 69-82

Liberty of Conscience and the Whitehall Debates of 1648-9

(1)  Polizzotto, Carolyn a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84972482361     PISSN: 00220469     EISSN: 14697637     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022046900060310     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (19)

References (69)
  • 1
    • 0040294045 scopus 로고
    • London
    • Vol. 67 of the Clarke Papers, Worcester College, Oxford; C. H. Firth (ed.), The Clarke Papers, London 1891-1901 (Camden Society New Series nos. 49, 54, 61, 61), vol. ii; A. S. P. Woodhouse (ed.), Puritanism and Liberty, London 1938.
    • (1938) Puritanism and Liberty
    • Woodhouse, A.S.P.1
  • 11
    • 84923632279 scopus 로고
    • London
    • [John Goodwin], M.S. to A.S. with a Plea for Libertie of Conscience in a Church Way, London 1644. The contemporary attribution of this work to Goodwin is upheld by Jordan, Development of Religious Toleration, iii. 380 n. 2; but queried by William Haller in Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution 1638-47, New York 1933-4, 1. 52 n.40.
    • (1644) M.S. to A.S. with a Plea for Libertie of Conscience in a Church Way
    • Goodwin, J.1
  • 12
    • 84972476817 scopus 로고
    • (not loose, but) Christian Libertie, London
    • A Paraenetick, or Humble Addresse to the Parliament and Assembly for (not loose, but) Christian Libertie, London 1644. Wing’s attribution of this tract to Roger Williams is unacceptable: Short-Title Catalogue, New York 1945-51, W2768.
    • (1644) Humble Addresse to the Parliament and Assembly for
  • 14
    • 84972476835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • (Second Edition), London
    • [William Walwyn], The Compassionate Samaritane, vnbinding the Conscience (Second Edition), London 1644/5. for the attribution of this work to Walwyn and for information concerning the first edition, see Haller, Tracts, 1. 123-5.
    • The Compassionate Samaritane, vnbinding the Conscience
    • Walwyn, W.1
  • 15
    • 60949853873 scopus 로고
    • London
    • [Henry Robinson], Liberty of Conscience, London 1643/4; [Henry Robinson], John the Baptist, [London 1644]. For the attribution of these works to Robinson, see W. K.Jordan, Men of Substance, Chicago 1942, 8g-go.
    • (1643) Liberty of Conscience
    • Robinson, H.1
  • 21
    • 84972230556 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 ijv; Clarke Papers, 2. 105; Woodhouse 149.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 105
  • 23
    • 80053767038 scopus 로고
    • The Authorship of Ancient Bounds
    • For attribution of this work to Joshua Sprigge, and denial of Jordan’s attribution of it to Francis Rous, see B. Keifer, ‘The Authorship of Ancient Bounds’, Church History, xxii (1953), 192-5.
    • (1953) Church History , vol.22 , pp. 192-195
    • Keifer, B.1
  • 24
  • 29
    • 84922764867 scopus 로고
    • London
    • [John Goodwin], Some Modest and Humble Queries, London 1646; John Goodwin, Hagiomastix, or the Scourge of the Saints displayed, London 1646/7; John Goodwin, A Postscript, London [1647]; John Goodwin, A Candle to see the Sunne, London 1647.
    • (1646) Some Modest and Humble Queries
    • Goodwin, J.1
  • 35
    • 84972314623 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 (cf. vol. 16 for a summary of the conclusions reached). For details of the surviving accounts of the discussion on other days, see Woodhouse, 169-78, 467-71.
    • Woodhouse , pp. 169-178
  • 38
    • 84972381214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1081; Clarke Papers, 2. 73; Woodhouse, 125. The full account of the debate must not be confused with the summary of conclusions reached (see above, 75 n.4), which both Firth and Woodhouse place at the beginning of their printed versions of the debate: Clarke Papers, 2. 71-2; Woodhouse, 125.
    • Worcester MSS. , pp. 67
  • 39
    • 84972149551 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • [John Lilburne], Foundations of Freedom, 10. This may not have been the exact wording of the clause debated on 14 December, since Lilburne later acknowledged that, in publishing the Levellers’ draft, he ‘mended a clause in the first Reserve about Religion, to the sense of us all but Ireton’: Legall Fundamentall Liberties, 35. For suggestions as to what may have been altered, see Brailsford, The Levellers, 382.
    • Foundations of Freedom , pp. 10
    • Lilburne, J.1
  • 40
    • 84917683275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1081; Clarke Papers, 2. 73; Woodhouse, 126. 5 Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. io8T; Clarke Papers, 2. 74; Woodhouse, 126.
    • Worcester MSS , pp. 67
  • 41
    • 84972432184 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. ioo,r; Clarke Papers, 2. 75; Woodhouse, 127.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 75
  • 42
    • 84972246548 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. ii7T; Clarke Papers, 2. 104; Woodhouse, 148.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 104
  • 43
    • 84972381214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Esp. by Colonel Thomas Harrison: Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fols. 1 i4r, 1 i6r; Clarke Papers, 2. 92, 100; Woodhouse, 140, 145. Cf. Clarke’s note: ‘All. Calling for the Question’, Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. ii7v; Clarke Papers, 2. 104; Woodhouse, 148.
    • Worcester MSS. , pp. 67
    • Harrison, C.T.1
  • 44
    • 84972381214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 115T; Clarke Papers, 2. 98; Woodhouse, 144.
    • Worcester MSS. , pp. 67
  • 45
    • 77950071219 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • This may have been the point at which Lilburne ‘took his leave’ of the officers ‘for a pack of dissembling juggling Knaves’, and ceased to attend the Debates: Legall Fundamentall Liberties, 35.
    • Legall Fundamentall Liberties , pp. 35
  • 46
    • 84917683275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 117; Clarke Papers, 2. 105; Woodhouse, 149.
    • Worcester MSS , pp. 67
  • 47
    • 84972230594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 i6T; Clarke Papers, 2. 102; Woodhouse, 146-7.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 102
  • 48
    • 84972230556 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 117V; Clarke Papers, 2. 105; Woodhouse, 149.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 105
  • 50
    • 84972381214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 if; Clarke Papers, 2. 105; Woodhouse, 14g. 4 Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. iigr; Clarke Papers, 2. 109; Woodhouse, 152.
    • Worcester MSS. , pp. 67
  • 51
    • 84972360822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • E.g., Worcester MSS. vol. 67 1 i7v-i i8r; Clarke Papers, 2. 105-6; Woodhouse, 149.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 105-106
  • 52
    • 84972381214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. n8r; Clarke Papers, 2. 107; Woodhouse, 150.
    • Worcester MSS. , pp. 67
  • 53
    • 84972381214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 igr; Clarke Papers, 2. 109; Woodhouse, 152.
    • Worcester MSS. , pp. 67
  • 54
    • 84972145236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • H. N. Brailsford has been the only commentator on the Debates to note the central role of the restrictive power question in the discussions on 14 December: The Leaellers, 379-80, 386.
    • The Leaellers , pp. 379-380
  • 58
    • 84972453754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 iov; Clarke Papers, 2. 81; Woodhouse, 131-2.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 81
  • 59
    • 84972231444 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 i6r; Clarke Papers, 2. 100; Woodhouse, 145.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 100
  • 60
    • 84972359743 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 i6r-v; Clarke Papers, 2. 101; Woodhouse, 145-6.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 101
  • 61
    • 84972359743 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 1 i6v; Clarke Papers, 2. 101; Woodhouse, 146.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 101
  • 62
    • 84972233933 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. i2ir; Clarke Papers, 2. 115; Woodhouse, 156.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 115
  • 63
    • 84972297658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fols. I2iv-I22r; Clarke Papers, 2. 117; Woodhouse, 158.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 117
  • 64
    • 84972394355 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. 124’; Clarke Papers, 2. 125; Woodhouse, 164.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 125
  • 65
    • 84972149546 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Worcester MSS. vol. 67 fol. i27r; Clarke Papers, 2. 131; Woodhouse, 16g. 4 See above, 71 and n.7.
    • Clarke Papers , vol.67 , pp. 131
  • 68
    • 33748198673 scopus 로고
    • London
    • Cf. Roger Williams, The Bloody Tenentyet more Bloody, London 1652; Real Examined London 1652; Thomas Cobbet, The Civil Magistrates Power in Matters of Religion, Londoi 1653; Master John Goodwins Queres questioned, London 1653.
    • (1652) The Bloody Tenentyet more Bloody
    • Williams, R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.