Innovative design systems, where are we and where do we go from here? Part I: Design by association

The Knowledge Engineering Review

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1992, Pages 183-213

  Navin Chandra, D ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84972482354     PISSN: 02698889     EISSN: 14698005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0269888900006342     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Bourne, D., Navin chandra, D. and Ramaswamy, R., 1989. “Relative tolerances and kinematic behaviour” In: J Gero, editor, AI in Design, Computational Mechanics.
2. Brown, D.C., and Chandrasekaran, B., 1984. “Expert systems for a class of mechanical design activity” In: Proceedings of IFIP W. G. 5.2 Working Conference on Knowledge Engineering in Computer-Aided Design, Budapest, Hungary.
3. Brown D.C. and Chandrasekaran, B., 1986. “Expert systems for a class of mechanical design activity” In: D Sriram and B Adey, editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on AI applications in Engineering, Computational Mechanics.
4. Carbonnell, J.G., 1983. “Learning by analogy: Formulating and generalizing plans from past experience” In: Rs Michalski, JG Carbonell and TM Mitchell, editors, Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Tioga Press.
5. Carbonnell, J.G., 1983b. “Deprivational analogy and its role in problem solving” In: Proceedings of AAAI-83, pp 64–69.
6. Carbonnell, J.G., 1986. “Deprivational analogy: A theory of reconstructive problem solving and expertise acquisition” In: Rs Michalski, JG Carbonell and TM Mitchell, Vol 2, Morgan Kaufman.
7. Dixon, J.R., 1985. Design Engineering: Inventiveness, Analysis and Decision Making McGraw Hill.
8. Dixon, J.R., 1988. “Designing with features: Building manufacturing knowledge into more intelligent CAD systems” In: Proceedings of ASME Manufacturing International-88 Atlanta GA, April 17–20.
9. Dyer, M.G., Flowers, M. and Hodges, J., 1986. “EDISON: An Engineering Design Invention System Operating Naively” In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Applications of Al to Engineering.
10. Evans, T.G. “A program for the solution of a class of geometric analogy intelligence test questions” In: M Minsky, editor, Semantic Information Processing MIT Press.
11. Faltings, B., 1989. “Qualitative kinematics in mechanisms” Artificial Intelligence (accepted).
12. Fikes, R.E., 1969. REF-ARF: A System For Solving Problems Related as Procedures Technical Report, Technical Note 14, Stanford Research Institute.
13. Fikes, R.E. and Nilsson, N.J., 1971. “STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving” Artificial Intelligence 2 189–208.
14. Fox, M.S., 1983. Constraint Directed Search: A case of Job Shop Scheduling PhD thesis, Carnegic-Mellon University.
15. Gentner, D., 1983. “Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy” Cognitive Science 7.
16. Gentner, D. and Landers, R., 1985. “Analogical reminding: A good match is hard to find” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics pp 607–613, Tucson, AZ.
17. Gentner, D. and Toupin, C., 1986. “Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy” Cognitive Science 10 277–300.
18. Gero, J., 1987. Seminar at Carnegie Mellon University.
19. Gero, J., 1990. “Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design” AI Magazine 11(4) 26–36.
20. Goel, A.K., 1989. Integration of Case-Based Reasoning and Model-Based Reasoning for Adaptive Design Problem Solving PhD thesis, Ohio State University
21. Goel, A.K., Kolodner, J.L., Pearce, M., Billington, R. and Zimring, C., 1991. “Towards a case-based tool for aiding conceptual design problem solving” In: Proceedings of the 1991 DARPA workshop on Case Based Reasoning, pp 109–120.
22. Gordon, W.J., 1961. Synectics: The development of Creative Capacity Harper & Row.
23. Gross, M.D., 1986, Design as Exploring Constraints PhD thesis, MIT.
24. Guilford, J.P., 1959. “Creativity” American Psychologist (5) 444–454.
25. Hammond, K.J., 1986. “CHEF: A model of case-based planning” In: Proceedings of AAAI-86 pp 267–271, Philadelphia, PA.
26. Holland, J.H., 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems University of Michigan Press.
27. Holyoak, K.J. and Koh, K., 1987. “Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer” Memory and Cognition 15 332–340.
28. Huhns, M.H., and Acosta, R.D., 1987. Argo: An Analogical Reasoning System for Solving Design Problems, Technical Report AI/CAD-092-87, Microelectronic and Computer Technology Corporation.
29. Jevons, W.S., 1892. The Principles of Science McMillan. Joskowicz, L and Addanki, S, 1988. “From kinematics to shape: An approach to innovative design”.
30. Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence pp. 347–352.
31. Kass, A.M. and Leake D.B., 1988. “Case-based reasoning applied to constructing explanations” In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Case-based Reasoning pp 190–208.
32. Kedar-Cabelli, S.T., 1985. Analogy—From a unified perspective Technical Report ML-TR-3, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University.
33. Kedar-Cabelli, S.T., 1985. “Purpose-directed analogy” In: Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Conference.
34. Kedar-Cabelli, S.T., 1985. Analogy—From a unified perspective Technical Report ML-TR-3, Rutgers University.
35. Kling, R.E., 1971. “A paradigm for reasoning by analogy” Artificial Intelligence 2(2).
36. Koestler, A., 1984. The act of creation McMillan.
37. Kolodner, J.L., 1980. Retrieval and organizational strategies in conceptual memory: A computer model PhD thesis, Yale University.
38. Kolodner, J.L., 1981. “Organization and retrieval in a conceptual memory for events” In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
39. Kolodner, J.L., 1984. Retrieval and Organizational Strategies in Conceptual Memory: A Computer Model Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Kolodner, J.L., 1988. “Retrieving events from a case memory: A parallel implementation” In: Proceedings of the 1988 Case-Based Reasoning Workshop pp 233–249.
41. Kota, S., 1990. “A qualitative matrix representation scheme for the conceptual design of mechanisms” In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Automation Conference (21st Biannual ASM E Mechanisms Conference).
42. Kuhn, T.S., 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions University of Chicago Press.
43. Lozano-Perez, T., 1983. “Spatial planning: A configuration space approach” IEEE Transactions on Computers C-32(2).
44. Maher, M.L., 1984. HI-RISE: An Expert System For The Preliminary Structural Design of High Rise Buildings PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie-Mellon University.
45. Maher, M.L. and Zhao, F., 1986. Using experience to plan the synthesis of new designs Technical Report, Engineering Design Research Center, CMU.
46. Maher, M.L. and Zhao, F., 1987. “Using experience to plan the synthesis of new designs” In: Js Gero, editor, Expert Systems in Computer-Aided Design North-Holland.
47. Minski, M., 1982. Learning Meaning Technical Report, M.I.T.
48. Mitchell, T.M., Keller, R.M. and Kedar-Cabelli, S.T., 1986, “Explanation-based generalization: A unifying view” Machine Learning 1(1).
49. Mittal, S., Dym, C. and Morjaria, M., 1985. “PRIDE: An expert system for the design of paper handling systems” In: C Dym, editor, Applications of Knowledge-Based Systems to Engineering Analysis and Design pp 99–116, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
50. Mostow, J., 1985. “Toward better models of the design process” The AI Magazine Spring.
51. Mostow, J., 1986. “Why are design derivations hard to replay?” In: Tm Mitchell, JG Carbonell and RS Michalski, editors, Machine Learning—A guide to current research Kluwer.
52. Murthy, S.S. and Addanki, S., 1987. “PROMPT: An innovative design tool” In: Proceedings of the sixth national conference on artificial intelligence pp 637–642.
53. Navin chandra, D., 1987. Exploring for Innovative Designs by Relaxing Criteria and reasoning from Precedent-Based Knowledge PhD thesis, MIT.
54. Navin chandra, D., 1988. “Case-based reasoning in CYCLOPS, a design problem solver” In: J Kolodner, editor, Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Case-based Reasoning pp 286–301, Morgan Kaufman.
55. Navin chandra, D., 1991. Exploration and Innovation in Design: Towards a Computational Model Springer-Verlag.
56. Navin chandra, D., Sriram, D. and Kedar-Cabelli, S.T., 1987. “On the role of analogy in engineering design: An overview” In: D Sriram and B Adey, editor, AI in Engineering, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Computational Mechanics.
57. Navin chandra, D., Sycara, K. and Narasimhan, S., 1991. “A transformational approach to case based synthesis” AI EDAM 5(1).
58. Navin chandra, D., Sycara, K.P. and Narasimhan, S., 1991. “Behavioural synthesis in CADET, A case-based design tool” In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications Miami, FL.
59. Newell, A. and Simon, H.A., 1972. Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall.
60. Nilsson, N.J., 1980. Principles of Artificial Intelligence, Tioga Publishing Co.
61. Osborn, A.F., 1953. Applied Imagination Charles Scribner’s Sons.
62. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., 1984. Engineering Design, Springer-Verlag.
63. Prieditis, A., editor, 1988. Analogica Pitman.
64. Rickards, T., 1974. Problem Solving through Creative Analysis Wiley.
65. Riesbeck, C.K. and Schank, R., 1989. Inside Case-Based Reasoning Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Rosenman, M. and Gero, J.S., 1989. “Creativity in design using a prototype approach” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Creative Design pp 207–232.
67. Rossman, J., 1931. The Psychology of the Inventor Inventor’s Publishing.
68. Schank, R.C., 1982. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of reminding and learning in computers and people Cambridge University Press.
69. Schank, R.C., 1986. Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70. Schank, R., 1988. The Creative Attitude: Learning to ask and answer the right questions Erlbaum.
71. Schank, R.C. and Abelson R.P., 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. Sriram, D., 1986. Knowledge-Based Approaches for Structural Design PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
73. Stefik, M., 1980. Planning with Constraints PhD thesis, Stanford University.
74. Steinberg, L., Langrana, N., Mitchell, T., Mostow, J. and Tong, C., 1986. A Domain Independent Model of Knowledge-Based Design Technical Report AI/VLSI Project Working Paper No. 33, Rutgers University.
75. Sussman, G.J. and Steele, G.L., 1980. “CONSTRAINTS—A language for expressing almost hierarchical constraints” Artificial Intelligence (14) 1–39.
76. Sycara, K., 1987. Resolving Adversarial Conflicts: An Approach Integrating Case-Based and Analytic Methods PhD thesis, School of Information and Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology.
77. Sycara, K.1 and Navin chandra D., 1989. “Representing and indexing design cases” In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of AI and Expert Systems TullahomK, TN.
78. Sycara, D and Navin chandra D, 1989. “Integrating case-based reasoning and qualitative reasoning in design” In: J Gero, editor, AI in Design Computational Mechanics.
79. Sycara, K. and Navin chandra, D., 1991. “Index transformation techniques for facilitating creative use of multiple cases” In: Proceedings of the twelth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
80. Tong, C., 1986. Knowledge-Based Circuit Design PhD thesis, Stanford University.
81. Tong, C., 1986b. A framework for organizing and evaluating knowledge-based models of the design process Technical Report AI/VLSI Project Working Paper No. 21, Rutgers University.
82. Tversky, A., 1977. “Features of similarity” Psychology Review 84(4), July.
83. Ullman, D.G. and Dietterich, T.A., 1987. “Mechanical design methodology: Implications on future developments of computer-aided design and knowledge-based systems” Engineering with Computers 2 21–29.
84. Wallas, G., 1926. The Art of Thought Harcourt.
85. Williams, B., 1989. Invention from First Principles via Topologies of Interaction PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
86. Williams, B., 1990. “Interaction-based invention: Designing novel devices from first principles” In: Proceedings of AAAI-90 pp 349–356, Boston, MA.
87. Winston, P.H., 1980. “Learning and reasoning by analogy” Communications of the ACM 23(12), December.
88. Winston, P.H., 1981. Learning New Principles from Precedents and Exercises: The Details Technical Report AI Lab Memo 632, MIT AI Lab.
89. Winston, P.H., Binford, T.O., Katz, B. and Lowry, M., 1983. “Learning physical descriptions from functional definitions, examples and precedents” In: Proceedings of AAAI-83 August.
90. Woodbury, R.F., 1989. “Design Genes” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Creative Design pp 133–154