On Dworkinian Equality

Social Philosophy and Policy

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1983, Pages 1-23

  Narveson, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84972468414     PISSN: 02650525     EISSN: 14716437     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265052500003290     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Ronald Dworkin,“What Is Equality?” In Two Parts: Part I, Equality of Welfare, Philosophy and Public Affairs (Summer 1981); Part II, Equality of Resources, Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (Fall 1981).
2. William Frankena in “The Concept of Social Justice”, in R. B. Brandt, ed., Social Justice (Englewood (1665, N.S.: Prentice-Hall, Spectrum Books,1962), cb. 20
3. Jan Narveson, Morality and Utility (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press,1967),164, e.g., more generally,154–169.
4. H. Sidgwick, Methods of Ethics (London: Macmillan,7th ed.,1962),382.
5. Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York, Basic Books,1974),206.
6. Jan Narveson,“Rawls and Utilitarianism”, in H. Miller & W. Williams, eds., The Limits of Utilitarianism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,1982). On the first point,138. On the second,140–141.
7. Ronald Dworkin,“The Original Position,” in N. Daniels, ed., Reading Rawls. (New York: Basic Books,1975),16–53. Originally in University of Chicago Law Review 40 Spring 1973): 500–533.
8. David P. Gauthier,“Justice and Natural Endowment: Toward a Critique of Rawls’ Ideological Framework”, Social Theory and Practice,3 (Spring 1974).
9. Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge: Harvard U. Press,1977)