-
2
-
-
84972427406
-
-
Royal Institute of International Affairs
-
Susan Strange, International Monetary Relations (Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1976), p. 181.
-
(1976)
International Monetary Relations
, pp. 181
-
-
Susan, S.1
-
5
-
-
84972137046
-
had probably the greatest Eurobond distribution capability of any single house at this time.
-
Nov. In the early years of the Eurobond market, according to Kerr, White Weld
-
Von Clemm to Burk, Nov. 1990. In the early years of the Eurobond market, according to Kerr, White Weld ‘had probably the greatest Eurobond distribution capability of any single house at this time.’ History, p. 21.
-
(1990)
History
, pp. 21
-
-
Von, C.1
Burk2
-
7
-
-
84972161875
-
Report on the Eurodollar Market for the Council of Europe
-
It has been estimated that the Eurodollar market grew from $1,500 million at the end of 1959 to over $50,000 million in 1970 Document 28 April
-
It has been estimated that the Eurodollar market grew from $1,500 million at the end of 1959 to over $50,000 million in 1970. A. Dequae, ‘Report on the Eurodollar Market for the Council of Europe’, Document 2939, 28 April 1971.
-
(1971)
, vol.2939
-
-
Dequae, A.1
-
12
-
-
84972213605
-
-
This is ironic, since one of the attractions of the Eurobond became the speed with which they could be organised and issued ascribes this to of the Companies Act
-
This is ironic, since one of the attractions of the Eurobond became the speed with which they could be organised and issued. Ferrier Charlton ascribes this to S. 423 (2) of the Companies Act 1948,
-
(1948)
, vol.423
, Issue.2
-
-
Ferrier, C.1
-
13
-
-
84972161059
-
The Bill was debated in 1928, a period of boom in the New York market. I believe that, only at the last moment, UK brokers & jobbers saw themselves excluded from that market if US distributors had to file prospectuses. They wouldn't have bothered, of course.
-
which determined that the offer of securities of a foreign company is not caught by UK prospectus rules as long as the offer is made to those whose ordinary business it is to buy or sell shares or debentures, either as principal or agent. In view of the identity of the chairman of this seminar, it is interesting to note that this dates back to amendments proposed at the last moment to what became the Companies Act by the then MP for the City of London believes that Grenfell's intervention was made for the following reason
-
which determined that the offer of securities of a foreign company is not caught by UK prospectus rules as long as the offer is made to those whose ordinary business it is to buy or sell shares or debentures, either as principal or agent. In view of the identity of the chairman of this seminar, it is interesting to note that this dates back to amendments proposed at the last moment to what became the Companies Act 1929 by the then MP for the City of London, Mr E. C. Grenfell. Mr Charlton believes that Grenfell's intervention was made for the following reason: ‘The Bill was debated in 1928, a period of boom in the New York market. I believe that, only at the last moment, UK brokers & jobbers saw themselves excluded from that market if US distributors had to file prospectuses. They wouldn't have bothered, of course.’
-
(1929)
-
-
Grenfell, E.C.1
Charlton2
-
14
-
-
84972192260
-
-
26 Oct. with accompanying document
-
Ferrier Charlton to Peter Catterall, 26 Oct. 1990, with accompanying document.
-
(1990)
-
-
Ferrier, C.1
Peter, C.2
-
17
-
-
84972376835
-
-
Nov.
-
Von Clemm to Burk, Nov. 1990.
-
(1990)
-
-
Von, C.1
Burk2
-
19
-
-
84972362708
-
-
Nov.
-
Von Clemm to Burk, Nov. 1990.
-
(1990)
-
-
Von, C.1
Burk2
-
21
-
-
84972437441
-
-
Interview with 8 June
-
Interview with Dr Michael von Clemm, 8 June 1990.
-
(1990)
-
-
von Clemm, M.1
-
22
-
-
84972224524
-
-
Kerr, History, pp. 22–29.
-
History
, pp. 22-29
-
-
Kerr1
-
23
-
-
84972224524
-
-
Kerr, History, pp. 30–31, 50–51.
-
History
, pp. 30-50
-
-
Kerr1
-
24
-
-
84972213545
-
-
Interview with 8 June
-
Interview with von Clemm, 8 June 1990.
-
(1990)
-
-
von, C.1
|