In Our Image: Colonial Discourse and the Anglicization of the Law of Mandatory Palestine

Israel Law Review

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 291-359

  Likhovski, Assaf ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84972434145     PISSN: 00212237     EISSN: 20479336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021223700014692     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. A. Polonski, “Hukat Hanezikin (The Civil Wrongs Ordinance)” (May 1945).
2. A. L. Tibawi, British Interests in Palestine 1800-1901 : A Study of Religious and Educational Enterprise (1961).
3. Edward Said, Orientalism (Vintage books edition, 1979) 100 (discussing the history and the colonialist nature of the London Society for Promoting Christianity among the Jews).
4. Dan Horowitz & Moshe Lissak, Origins of the Israeli Polity: Palestine Under the Mandate (1978).
5. Zachary Lockman, “Railway Workers and Relational History: Arabs and Jews in British-Ruled Palestine”, (1993) 35 Comparative Studies in Society and History 601.
6. Zachary Lockman, “Exclusion and Solidarity: Labor Zionism and Arab Workers in Palestine, 1887-1929”, in Gyan Prakash, ed., After Colonialism: Imperial Histories and Postcolonial Displacements (1993) 211 (discussing “relational” history).
7. Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman, eds., Colonial Discourse and Post Colonial Theory: A Reader (1994) 9.
8. Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism (Vintage books edition, 1994) 61.
9. Jane F. Collier, “Review Essay: Intertwined Histories: Islamic Law and Western Imperialism”, (1994) 28 Law and Society R. 395.
10. David Kennedy & Chris Tennant, “New Approaches to International Law: A Bibliography”, (1994) 35 Harv. Int’l L.J. 417.
11. Sally Falk Moore, “Treating Law as Knowledge: Telling Colonial Officers What to Say to Africans about Running Their Own’ Native Courts”, (1992) 26 Law and Society R. 11.
12. Note, “Interpreting Oriental Cases: The Law of Alterity in the Colonial Courtroom”, (1994) 107 Harv. L.R. 1711.
13. William W. Fisher III, “Ideology and Imagery in the Law of Slavery” (1993) 68 Chi-Kent L. R. 1051 (attempting in a somewhat similar fashion to link cultural images and legal doctrine in American law).
14. Timothy Mitchell, Colonising Egypt (University of California edition, 1991) 167.
15. Bernard Wasserstein, The British in Palestine: The Mandatory Government and the Arab Jewish Conflict 1917–1929 (2nd ed., 1990).
16. Evyatar Friesel, “ Through a Peculiar Lens: Zionism and Palestine in British Diaries, 1927-31”, (1993) Middle Eastern Studies 419 (discussing the attitude of British officials towards the Jews in the 1920s).
17. Jacob Reuveny, Mimshal Hamandat Be’eretz Yisrael 1920-1948: Nituakh Histori Medini [The Administration of Palestine Under the British Mandate 1920-1948: An Institutional Analysis] (1993) 185.
18. John Haynes Holmes, Palestine To-day and To-morrow: A Gentile's Survey of Zionism (1929) 151-152.
19. Ronald Storrs, The Memoirs of Sir Ronald Storrs (1937) 385–386, 388
20. Norman and Helen Bentwich, Mandate Memories 1918– 1948 (1965) 90, 91.
21. Gad Frumkin, Derekh Shofet BYerushalayim [The Life of a Jerusalem Judge] (1956) 312–313.
22. John Marlowe, Rebellion in Palestine (1946) 102.
23. Roger Louis, “British Imperialism and the End of the Palestine Mandate”, in Wm. Roger Louis and Robert W. Stookey, eds., The End of the Palestine Mandate (1986) 1, 23–24.
24. Roger Owen, “Defining Tradition: Some Implications of the Use of Ottoman Law in Mandatory Palestine”, (1994) 1 Harvard Middle Eastern and Islamic R. 115, 117.
25. Anton Bertram, The Colonial Service (1930) 154.
26. Olawale Elias, British Colonial Law: A Comparative Study of the Interaction Between English and Local Laws in British Dependencies (1962) 80–81.
27. Konard Zweigert & Hein Kotz, Introduction to Comparative Law, Vol. 1 (2nd ed., 1987) 233–245.
28. Daniel Friedmann, “The Effects of Foreign Law on the Law of Israel: Infusion of the Common Law into the Legal System of Israel”, (1975) 10 Is. L.R. 324, at 327–352.
29. Penhas v. Felam, (1925) 3 Rotenberg 995.
30. Friedman v. Miller, (1931) 2 Rotenberg 788.
31. Raym v. Hadar Hacarmel Cooperative Society, (1933) 3 Rotenberg 1001.
32. Ottoman Bank, Haifa v. Mulki, (1935) 9 Rotenberg 766.
33. Chedid v. Tenenbaum, (1933) 2 Rotenberg 406, at 418.
34. Faruqi v. Ayoub, (1937) 4 P.L.R., 331, at 338.
35. Michael Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (Vintage Book edition, 1994) 21.
36. Michael F.J. McDonnell, A History of St. Paul (1909). After his retirement, McDonnell continued his research into the history of the school. The notes he gathered were published posthumously.
37. Michael F.J. McDonnell, The Annals of St. Paul's School (1959).
38. Michael F.J. McDonnell, The Registers of St. Paul's School, 1509–1748 (1977).
39. McDonnell, A History of St. Paul, id., at 465, 472.
40. J. A. Mangan, “Introduction: Imperialism, History and Education”, in J. A. Mangan, ed., “Benefits Bestowed?”: Education and British Imperialism (1988) 1, 6–8.
41. Faruqi 1, at 394.
42. Faruqi III, at 120 (emphasis added).
43. Faruqi II at 338.
44. Abu Ghazaleh v. Maccabi Cooperative Society, (1937) 4 P.L.R. 364, at 365.
45. Frumkin, id., at 463.
46. “Shinuyim Bamangenon Hamishpati [Changes in the Legal Service]”, (Apr. 1944) HaPraklit, 3–4.
47. Moyal v. Karawassarsky, (1940) 7 P.L.R. 482.
48. General Manager, Palestine Railways v. Matalon, (1940) 7 P.L.R. 179.
49. Agrest v. Fish, (1944) S. C. J. 139.
50. Farkas v. Spiegler, (1944) 11 P.L.R. 586, at 588.
51. Fischer v. Geffen, (1941) 8 P.L.R. 197.
52. Kornstein v. Flaster, (1943) 10 P.L.R. 315.
53. Abu Khadra v. Abu Khadra, (1943) 10 P.L.R. 371.
54. Jarrous v. Adas, (1941) 9 P.L.R. 707, 708–709.
55. Messrs Kunzler & Co. v. Dr. Raises, (1942) 9 P.L.R. 115.
56. Khoury v. Khayat, (1940) 7 P.L.R. 191.
57. Vadash v. Chief Executive Officer Tel Aviv, (1943) 10 P.L.R. 706.
58. Khoury v. Khayat, (1943) 10 P.L.R. 271, at 280.
59. William FitzGerald, “The Law in the Era of Reconstruction”, (April, 1944) HaPraklit, 1. See also William FitzGerald, “Law in the Empire (1943?)” [a lecture given at the Jerusalem YMCA, published by Goldberg's Press, Jerusalem and found in the Library of Congress, Washington].
60. Abu Miriam v. Attorney General, (1941) 1941 S.C.J. (1) 128.
61. El Majdoub v. Attorney General, (1945) 13 P.L.R. 69.
62. Kataf v. Attorney General, (1946) 13 P.L.R. 39, 40, 41.
63. Atiyeh v. Attorney General, (1947) S.C.J. 729, 730.
64. Markoff v. Homasi, (1945) 12 P.L.R. 272, at 278.
65. Greiber v. Baumhall, (1945) 12 P.L.R. 212, at 216 (emphasis added).
66. Albina v. El-Ama, (1945) 12 P.L.R. 217.
67. Lewitt v. District Commissioner, Haifa, (1944) 11 P.L.R. 424 (Frumkin, J.)
68. Bamieh v. Ali, (1944) 11 P.L.R. 570, 572.
69. L. Bendix, “Al Hagormim Ha’iratzyonalim Bemakhshavat Hashofet [On the Irrational Factors in Judicial Thought]”, (Oct. 1944) HaPraklit 3.
70. A. Polonsky, “Nezikin Bli Khok Nezikin [Torts without a Tort Ordinance]”, (1947) 4 HaPraklit 182.