Nuisance—prevention or payment?

The Cambridge Law Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 87-109

  Tromans, Stephen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84972343683     PISSN: 00081973     EISSN: 14692139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0008197300107871     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Shoreham-by-the-Sea Urban District Council v. Dolphin Canadian Proteins Ltd. (1972) 71 L.G.R. 261.
2. Dunton v. Dover District Council The Times, 31 March 1977-1978) 76 L.G.R. 87.
3. Kennaway V. Thompson [1980] 3 All E.R. 329.
4. King v. Taylor(1976) 238 E.G. 265.
5. Coase, “The problem of social cost” (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1;
6. Michelman, “Pollution as a tort: A non-accidental perspective on Calabresi's costs” (1971) 80 Yale L.J. 647;
7. Calabresi and Melamed, “Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: One view of the cathedral” (1972) 85 Harv.L.R. 1089;
8. Ellickson, “Alternatives to zoning: Covenants, nuisance rules, and fines as land use controls“(1973) 40 University of Chicago Law Review 688;
9. Hagman and Misczynski, Windfalls for Wipeouts (1978), Chap. 8.
10. Pearce, “Property rights vs. Development Control: A preliminary evaluation of alternative planning policy instruments” (1981) 52 Town Planning Review 47.
11. Commentaries, Vol. 1, p. 139.
12. Jolowicz, “Damages in Equity—A Study of Lord Cairns’ Act” [1975] C.L.J. 224.
13. R. A. Buckley, The Law of Nuisance (1981), pp. 131–132.
14. Wood v. Conway Corpn. [1914] 2 Ch. 47
15. Spry, Equitable Remedies, 2nd ed. (1980), p. 375.
16. Buckley, Equitable Remedies, at p. 122.
17. King v. Taylor(1976) 238 E.G. 265.
18. Bunclark V. Hertfordshire County Council (1977) 243 E.G. 381, 455.
19. John Young & Co. v. The Bankier Distillery Co.[1893] A.C. 691.
20. Denning L.J. said that questions of public inconvenience were “strong reasons for suspending the injunction”: [1953] 1 All E.R. 179, 204.
21. The Guardian, 11 August 1981, p. 1.
22. the recommendations of the Law Commission on “Rights of access to neighbouring land,” Working Paper No. 78, August 1981, paras. 3.8 and 5.15.
23. Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. (1970) 26 N.Y.2d. 219, 226.
24. Markesinis and Tettenborn(1981) 131 N.L.J. 108.
25. Bennett, “Pollution Control in England and Wales” (1972) 5 Environmental Policy and Law 93, 190.
26. Michelman at pp. 669-670;
27. Ellickson at pp. 720, 739;
28. Calabresi and Melamed at pp. 1119-20;
29. Hagman and Misczynski at p. 173.
30. Burrows, Hagman and Misczynski, and Ogus and Richardson at pp. 292, 314–317.
31. Bamford v. Turnley (1862) 3 B. & S. 67, 85
32. Lord Denning M.R. at pp. 1014–1016.
33. Cumming-Bruce L.J. at pp. 1023–1024.
34. Davies, The Law of Compulsory Purchase and Compensation 3rd ed., p. 181, n. 8.
35. Bamford v. Turnley (1862) 3 B. & S. 67, 85 – 86, per Martin B.
36. Miller v. Jackson [1977] 3 All E.R. 338, 345.