Changing Pressure-Group Politics: The Case of the Trades Union Congress, 1976–84

British Journal of Political Science

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1987, Pages 509-517

  Mitchell, Neil J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971961709     PISSN: 00071234     EISSN: 14692112     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400004907     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Harry Eckstein, Pressure Group Politics: The Case of the British Medical Association (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1960).
2. Ross Martin, TUC: The Growth of a Pressure Group 1868–1976 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).
3. Frank Wilson, ‘French Interest Group Politics: Pluralist or Neocorporatist?’ American Political Science Review, LXXVII (1983), pp. 895–910, very useful.
4. TUC, Strategy (London: Trades Union Congress 1984), p. 11.
5. Harold Macmillan, The Middle Way (London: Macmillan, 1938), p. 290.
6. Keith Joseph, Stranded on the Middle Ground (London: Centre for Policy Studies, 1976), p. 20.
7. The Times (6 October 1981), p. 3.
8. TUC, Annual Report (London: Trades Union Congress, 1979), p. 282.
9. TUC, Annual Report (London: Trades Union Congress, 1984), pp. 380–381.
10. TUC, Annual Report (London: Trades Union Congress, 1979), p. 286.
11. TUC, Annual Report (London: Trades Union Congress, 1982), p. 537.
12. Martin, TUC, pp. 357–359.
13. Mancur Olson, The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982) p. 78.