Russia's Debt to the Mongols in Suretyship and Collective Responsibility

Comparative Studies in Society and History

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 249-270

  Dewey, Horace W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971943449     PISSN: 00104175     EISSN: 14752999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0010417500015188     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. H. W. Dewey and A. M. Kleimola, “Russian Collective Consciousness:The Kievan Roots”, The Slavonic and East European Review, 62:2 (April 1982), 181–82.
2. H. W. Dewey and A. M. Kleimola, “Suretyship and Collective Responsibility in pre-Petrine Russia”, Jahrbuecher fuer Geschichte Osteuropas, 18 (1970), 337–54.
3. F. W. Cleaves, ed. and trans., Yüan Ch'aoPi Shih. The Secret History of the Mongols (Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1982), 211–14, par. 272.
4. H. W. Dewey and A. M. Kleimala. “From the Kinship Group to Every Man His Brother's Keeper:Collective Responsibility in Pre-Petrine Russia”, Jahrbuecher fuer Geschichle Osteuropas, 30 (1982), 322-35.
5. Paul H. C. Ch'en Chinese Legal Tradition under the Mongols. The Code of 1291 as Reconstructed (Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1979), 53.
6. Rashid-ad-Din, Sbornik, 217–18, 229.
7. O. Lattimore, “Chingis Khan and the Mongol Conquests”, Scientific American, 209:2 (August 1963), 59–60.
8. G. V. Vernadskii. O sostave velikoi iasy Chingisa Khana (Brussels:Petropolis, 1939), 44.
9. M. D. Poluboiarinova, Russkie liudi v zolotoi orde (Moscow:“Nauka”, 1978), 13–15.
10. K. A. Wittfogel and Feng Chia-Sheng, History of Chinese Society (907–1125), Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s. 36 (Philadelphia:American Philosophical Society, 1946), 3, 198, 310, 312.
11. H. F. Schumann, “Mongolian Tributary Practices of the Thirteenth Century”, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 19:3–4 (1956), 367–68.
12. Munkuev, Kitaiskii istochnik, 7, 77.
13. T. T. Allsen, “Mongol Census Taking in Rus', 1245–1275”, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 5:1 (March 1981), 36–37.
14. G. Vernadsky, The Mongols and Russia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953), 215.
15. R. Mitchell and N. Forbes, trans. The Chronicle of Novgorod, 1016–1471 (New York:AMS Press, 1970), 95–96.
16. Vernadsky, Mongols and Russia, 216, 222–23.
17. M. N. Pokrovskii, History of Russia from the Earliest Times to the Rise of Commercial Capitalism, J. Clarkson and M. Griffiths, trans. (New York:International Publishers, 1930), 72.
18. Pokrovskii, History of Russia, 98.
19. M. Roublev, “The Mongol Tribute According to the Wills and Agreements of the Russian Princes”, in The Structure of Russian History:Interpretive Essays, M. Cherniavsky, ed. (New York:Random House, 1970), 29–64.
20. R. Hellie, Enserfment and Military Change in Muscovy (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1971), 1–16.
21. H. W. Dewey and A. M. Kleimola, “The Petition (Chelobitnaia) as an Old Russian Literary Genre”, The Slavic and East European Journal, 14:3 (1970), 284–301.
22. G. Fletcher. Of theRus Commonwealth, A. Schmidt, ed. (Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 1966), 72.
23. S. Maksimov, Krylatye slova (Moscow:Gosizdat khudozhestvennoi literatury, 1955), 157–58.
24. W. H. Dewey and A. M. Kleimola, “Coercion by Righter (Pravezh) in Old Russian Administration”, Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 9:2 (Summer 1975), 164–66.
25. J. B. Grosier, The World of Ancient China (Geneve:Minerva, 1972), 15, 17–19.