American Political Science before the Mirror: What Our Journals Reveal about the Profession

The Journal of Politics

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1976, Pages 895-917

  Baum, William C ^a   Griffiths, G N ^a   Matthews, Robert ^a   Scherruble, Daniel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971942088     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2129500     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
2. Sheldon S. Wolin, “Paradigms and Political Theories,” in Politics and Experience, ed. Preston King and B. C. Parekh, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1968)
3. Martin Landau, Political Theory and Political Science (New York: Macmillan Co., 1972).
4. Kuhn, The Structure, 10.
5. Landau, Political Theory, 72.
6. David Truman, “Disillusion and Regeneration: The Quest for a Discipline,” American Political Science Review, 59 (December 1965), 872
7. Wolin, “Paradigms,” 138.
8. David Easton: “The New Revolution in Political Science,” American Political Science Review, 63 (December 1969), 1051–1061.
9. E. E. Schattschneider, Two Hundred Million Americans In Search of A Government (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc., 1969), 8.
10. Warren Hagstrom, The Scientific Community (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1965), 29–33.
11. Diana Crane, Invisible Colleges (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), ch. 2 and 34–40;
12. Derek Price, Little Science, Big Science (New York: Columbia University Press, 1963), ch. 3.
13. Norman Storer, The Social System of Science (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966), 158.
14. Price, Little Science, 89.
15. Warren Hagstrom, The Scientific Community (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1965).
16. Beverly L. Clarke, “Multiple Authorship Trends in Scientific Papers,” Science, 143 (1964), 822–824.
17. M. Smith, “The Trend Toward Multiple Authorship in Psychology,” American Psychologist, 13 (1958), 596–599
18. M. C. Lovell, “The Production of Economic Literature: An Interpretation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 11 (March 1973), 40.
19. Hagstrom, The Scientific, ch. III.
20. Derek J. deSolla Price, “Networks of Scientific Papers,” Science, 149 (30 July 1965), 510.
21. M. C. Lovell, “The Production,” 40.
22. Nan Lin and Carnot E. Nelson, “Bibliographic Reference Patterns in Core Sociological Journals, 1965-66,” The American Sociologist (February 1969), 48.
23. Kuhn, Structure, 20.
24. Price, “Networks,” 515.
25. C. S. Gillmor and C. J. Terman, “Communication Modes of Geophysics: The Case of Ionospheric Physics,” EOS (copyright by American Geophysical Union), 54 (1973), 900–908.
26. M. C. Lovell, “The Production of Economic Literature: An Interpretation,” Journal of Economic Literature, V (March 1973), 46.
27. R. E. Burton and R. W. Kebler, “The ‘Half-Life’ of Some Scientific and Technical Literatures,” American Documentation, XI (1960), 18–22.
28. Harriet Zuckerman and Robert Merton, “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System,” Minerva, 9 (January 1971), 66–100.
29. “Report of the Managing Editor,” PS, IV (Fall, 1971) 542;
30. “Editorial Note,” Journal of Politics, 34 (May 1972), VI.
31. Janet M. Chase, “Normative Criteria for Scientific Publication,” The American Sociologist, V (August 1970), 265.
32. George C. Homans, The Nature of Social Science (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1967), 10.
33. Jack Walker, “Brother Can You Paradigm?,” PS (Fall 1972), 419–422;
34. David C. Schwartz, “Toward A More Relevant and Rigorous Political Science,” Journal of Politics, 36 (February 1974), 103–137;
35. David Pfotenhauer, “Conceptions of Political Science in West Germany and the United States, 1960-1969,” Journal of Politics, 34 (1972), 554–591.
36. Schwartz, “Toward,” 116.
37. Walker, “Brother,” 420.
38. Easton, “The New Revolution,” 1057.
39. Pfotenhauer, “Conceptions,” 570.
40. Walker, “Brother,” 421
41. Schwartz, “Toward,” 115.
42. Martin Landau, Political Theory, 21–27.
43. Pfotenhauer, “Conceptions,” 579
44. Dennis Wrong, ed., Max Weber (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1970), 36.
45. Jacques Barzun, Clio and The Doctors (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), 61.
46. Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, II (New York: Harper Torchbook, 1963—originally published in 1945), 93.
47. Robert K. Merton, “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action,” American Sociological Review, I (1936), 894–904.
48. Karl W. Deutsch, John Platt and Dieter Senghaas, “Conditions Favoring Major Advances in Social Science,” Science, 171 (5 February 1971), 457.
49. Arthur Koestler, The Act of Creation (New York: Macmillan Co., 1964), 252
50. Koestler, The Act, 147.
51. J. Bronowski, The Ascent of Man (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1973), 330–332.
52. Diderot, “Encyclopédie,” quoted in Emest Becker, The Structure of Evil (New York: George Braziller, Inc., 1968), 3.
53. Alexandre Koyré, From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1958), 29.
54. Koestler, The Act, 693.