Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in

The Journal of Economic History

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 1990, Pages 541-567

  Cowan, Robin ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971803835     PISSN: 00220507     EISSN: 14716372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022050700037153     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Power Experience, Proceedings of a Conference on Nuclear Power Experience (Vienna, 1983), vol. 1, p. 51.
2. Paul David, “CLIO and the Economics of QWERTY,” American Economic Review, 75 (May 1985);
3. Morris Teubal and Edward Stein-Mueller, “Government Policy, Innovation and Economic Growth: Lessons From a Study of Satellite Communications,” Research Policy, 11 (Oct. 1981);
4. S.H. Karlson, “Adoption of Competing Inventions by United States Steel Producers,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 68 (Aug. 1986).
5. Paul David with Julie Bunn, “The Economics of Gateway Technologies and Network Evolution: Lessons from Electricity Supply History,” Information Economics and Policy, 3 (No. 2, 1988).
6. Brian Arthur, “Competing Technologies and Economic Prediction,” Options, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Laxenburg, Austria, 1984);
7. Charles McLaughlin, “The Stanley Steamer: A Study in Unsuccessful Innovation,” Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, 7 (Oct. 1954).
8. Brian Arthur, “Competing Technologies: An Overview,” in G. Dosi, et al., eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory (London, 1988).
9. Kenneth Arrow, “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” Review of Economic Studies, 29 (June 1962), p. 157.
10. Brian Arthur, “On Competing Technologies and Historical Small Events: The Dynamics of Choice Under Increasing Returns” (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Working Paper WP-83-90, 1983);
11. Brian Arthur, “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events,” Economic Journal, 99 (Mar. 1989).
12. Joe Farrell and Garth Saloner, “Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation,” Rand Journal of Economics, 16 (Spring 1985);
13. Joe Farrell and Garth Saloner, “Installed Base and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, 76 (Dec. 1986);
14. Michael Katz and Carl Shapiro, “Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, 75 (May 1985);
15. Michael Katz and Carl Shapiro, “Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities,” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (Aug. 1986).
16. Robin Cowan, “Backing the Wrong Horse: Sequential Technology Choice Under Increasing Returns” (Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, 1987).
17. Irwin Bupp and Jean-Claude Derian, Light Water: How the Nuclear Dream Dissolved (New York, 1968), chap. 1, fn. 3.
18. W. Marshall, “Reactor Technology,” Nuclear Power Technology, vol. 1 (Oxford, 1983);
19. Alan Cottrell, “The Pressure on Nuclear Safety,” New Scientist (Mar. 25, 1982);
20. David Green, “AGR v PWR: The Debate Continues,” Energy Policy, 14 (Feb. 1986);
21. M. Piran and W. Murgatroyd, “Fuelling Costs of Nuclear Reactors,” Energy Policy, 12 (Mar. 1984);
22. Nucleonics, 15 (June 1957), p. 71.
23. Hugh Mclntyre, “Natural-Uranium Heavy-Water Reactors,” Scientific American, 233 (Oct. 1975).
24. G. R. Fanjoy, “Generating Costs From Candu,” European Symposium on the Candu Reactor, London (Mar. 1982);
25. Harold Agnew, “Gas-Cooled Nuclear Power Reactors,” Scientific American, 244 (June 1981);
26. Alvin Weinberg and Irving Spiewak, “Inherently Safe Reactors and a Second Nuclear Era,” Science, 29 (June 1984);
27. Eliot Marshall, “The Gas Reactor Makes a Comeback,” Science, 29 (May 1984).
28. Phillip Mullenbach, Civilian Nuclear Power: Economic Issues and Policy Formation (New York, 1964), p. 39.
29. Bupp and Derian, Light Water, p. 6.
30. Nathan Rosenberg, Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge, 1982), p. 122.
31. United Nations, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Peaceful Uses of the Atom (Geneva, 1955), p. 368.
32. Bupp and Derian, Light Water, p. 45.
33. Peter DeLeon, Development and Diffusion of the Nuclear Power Reactor: A Comparative Analysis (Cambridge, MA, 1978), p. 200.
34. Paul Joskow and G. A. Rozanski, “The Effects of Learning by Doing on Nuclear Plant Operating Reliability,“Review of Economics and Statistics, 61 (May 1979).
35. W.E. Mooz, Cost Analysis of Light Water Reactor Power Plants (Prepared for the Department of Energy, Rand Corporation, R-2304-DOE, Santa Monica, 1978).
36. Martin Zimmerman, “Learning Effects and the Commercialization of New Energy Technologies: The Case of Nuclear Power,“Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (Autumn 1982).
37. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Power Experience, vol. 1, pp. 137, 170.
38. Bupp and Derian, Light Water, p. 37.
39. R. G. Hewlett and F. Duncan, Nuclear Navy, 1946–1962 [Chicago, 1974], p. 135.
40. R. Williams, The Nuclear Power Decisions: British Policies, 1953–78 (London, 1980).
41. Lawrence Hafstad, “Reactors,” Scientific American, 184 (Apr. 1951), p. 43.
42. Bupp and Derian, Light Water, p. 32.
43. Mullenbach, Civilian Nuclear Power, p. 131.
44. Theodore Stern, Appraisal of Reactor Systems for Central-Station Power Plants, Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, part 1, 54 (Nov. 1954)
45. J. A. Lane, “An Evaluation of Geneva and Post-Geneva Nuclear-Power Economic Data,” The Economics of Nuclear Power, series 8 (New York, 1957).
46. Nucleonics, 15 (June 1957), p. 68.
47. Alvin Weinberg, “Power Reactors,” Scientific American, 191 (Dec. 1954), p. 36.
48. Jonathan Hughes, The Vital Few: The Entrepreneur and American Economic Progress (New York, 1986).
49. R. G. Hewlett and F. Duncan, A History of the united States Atomic Energy Commission, vol. 2: Atomic Shield, 194711952 (University Park, PA, 1969), p. 226.
50. Weinberg,“Power Reactors.”
51. Hewlett and Duncan, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, p. 231.
52. Cowan, “Backing the Wrong Horse,” chap. 4;
53. Rosenberg, Inside the Black Box
54. M. Hertsgaard, Nuclear Inc: The Men and Money Behind Nuclear Energy (New York, 1983), p. 25.
55. John McKitterick, General Electric vice president for corporate planning, quoted in Hertsgaard, Nuclear Inc, p. 42.