Analogical Concepts: The Fourteenth-Century Background to Cajetan

Dialogue

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1992, Pages 399-414

  Ashworth, E J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971730755     PISSN: 00122173     EISSN: 17590949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300012051     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bruno Pinchard, métaphysique et sémantique. Autour de Cajetan. Étude [texte] et traduction du “De Nominum Analogia” (Paris: Vrin, 1987), p. 114.
2. E. J. Ashworth, “Signification and Modes of Signifying in Thirteenth-Century Logic: A Preface to Aquinas on Analogy,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology; 1 (1991): 39–67.
3. E. J. Ashworth, “Analogy and Equivocation in Thirteenth-Century Logic: Aquinas in Context,” Mediaeval Studies (forthcoming).
4. E. J. Ashworth, “Equivocation and Analogy in Fourteenth Century Logic: Ockham, Burley and Buridan” in B. Mojsisch and O. Pluta, eds., Historia Philosophiae Medii Ævi: Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophic des Mittelalters (Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner, 1991), Vol. 1, p. 23–43.
5. Aristotle, Categories Ial-15, in Aristoteles Latinus I 1–5:.
6. Categoriae vel Praedicamenta, edited by L. Minio-Paluello (Leiden: Brill, 1961), p. 5:.
7. N. Kretzmann and E. Stump, The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, Vol. 1: Logic and the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 89.
8. Commentaire sur les Catégories d’Aristofe: Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, edited by A. Pattin (Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain; Paris: Beatrice-Nauwelaerts, 1971), Vol. 1, p. 39.
9. Boethius, In Categorias Aristotelis libri quatuor, in Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Latina, edited by J.-P. Migne (Paris, 1891), Vol. 64, col. 166; Simplicius, Commentaire, p. 39.
10. G. Gál, in Opera Philosophica II (St. Bonaventure, NY: St. Bonaventure University, 1978), p. 143–144.
11. C. H. Lohr, “Logica Algazelis: Introduction and Critical Text” Traditio, 21 [1965]: 246).
12. Albert the Great, Liber de Praedicabilia, in Opera omnia, edited by Auguste Borgnet (Paris: Vives, 1890), Vol. 1, p. 11a–11b.
13. Averroes, Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Commentariis (Venetiis apud Junctas, 1562–74; rpt. Frankfurt: Minerva, 1962), Vol. 8.
14. J. C. Wey, Opera Theologica 9 (St. Bonaventure, NY: St. Bonaventure University, 1980), p. 355.
15. Simplicius, Commentaire, p. 43.
16. F. E. Kelley and G. I. Etzkorn, Opera Theologica 6 (St. Bonaventure, NY: St. Bonaventure University, 1982), p. 338.
17. Hervaeus Natalis, Quolibeta (Venetiis, 1513; rpt. Ridgwood, NJ: Gregg Press, 1966), f. 44 ra–rb.
18. Marilyn McCord Adams, “Universals in the Early Fourteenth Century” in Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny and Jan Pinborg, eds., Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), p. 436.
19. Sten Ebbesen, “Concrete Accidental Terms: Late Thirteenth-Century Debates about Problems Relating to Such Terms as ‘Album’” in Norman Kretzmann, ed., Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy (Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988), p. 114.
20. Simon of Faversham, Quaestiones super libro Perihermeneias, in Magistri Simonis Anglici sive de Faverisham Opera omnia 1: Opera logica, edited by Pasquale Mazzarella (Padua: CEDAM, 1957), p. 155.
21. Joseph Owens, “Common Nature: A Point of Comparison Between Thomistic and Scotistic Metaphysics” Mediaeval Studies, 19 (1957).
22. Paulus Soncinas, Quaestiones Metaphysicales Acutissimae (Venice, 1588; rpt. Frankfurt: Minerva GmbH, 1967), p. 2b.
23. Gabriel Nuchelmans, Judgment and Proposition from Descartes to Kant (Amsterdam, Oxford and New York: North-Holland, 1983), p. 9–26.
24. De Totius Logicae Aristofelis Summa, in S. Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia Vol. 7, edited by Robertus Busa (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1980), p. 644a.
25. Hervaeus Natalis, Quolibeta, f. 43 rb.
26. Peter Aureol, Scriptum Super Primum Sententiarum, 2 vols., edited by Eligius M. Buytaert (St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute; Louvain, Belgium: E. Nauwelaerts; Paderborn, Germany: F. Schöningh, 1956), p. 483.
27. Johannes Capreolus, Defensiones theologiae divi Thomae Aquinatis. Vol. 1, edited by Ceslai Paban and Thomas Pègues in seven volumes (Turonibus: A. Cattier 1900—1908;rpt. Frankfurt/Main: Minerva GmbH, 1967), 141.
28. Jean-Luc Marion, Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1981), p. 80–82.
29. S. Ebbesen, Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Ævi, No. 7 (Copenhagen: Gad, 1977), p. 129–34, 310–17.
30. John Duns Scotus, In librum Praedicamentorum quaestiones, in Opera omnia 1 (Paris: Vivès, 1891), p. 446a–447a.
31. Petrus Fonseca, Commentariorvm In Metaphysicorvm Aristotelis Stagiritae Libros Tomvs I–II (Cologne, 1615; rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964), cols. 712–13.
32. Jan Pinborg, “Anonymi Quaestiones in Tractatus Petri Hispani I–III Traditae in codice Cracoviensi 742 (anno fere 1350),” Cahiers de I’institut du moyen-âge grec et latin, 41 (1982): 9.
33. Johannes Versor, Quaestiones super metaphysicam, f. xxv vb.
34. Hervaeus Natalis, Quolibeta, f. 46 va.
35. Soncinas, Quaestiones Metaphysicales, p. 6a–7b.
36. Aureol, Scriptum, p. 471–523.
37. E. Kelley (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1991), Vol. 1, p. 169, n. 2.
38. Aureol, Scriptum, p. 471–523.
39. Soncinas, Quaestiones Metaphysicales, p. 2.
40. Aureol, Scriptum, p. 491–505.
41. Fonseca, Commentariorum In Metaphysicorum, col. 689.