Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right

PLoS Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Ebersole, Charles R ^a   Axt, Jordan R ^a   Nosek, Brian A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR OPEN SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INVENTION; MOTIVATION; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; REPRODUCIBILITY; REWARD; SCIENCE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; INVENTIONS; MOTIVATION; PUBLIC OPINION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; REWARD; SCIENCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84971636078     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002460     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Open Science CollaborationEstimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349(6251):aac4716–aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac471626315443
2. Nosek B, Alter G, Banks G, Borsboom D, Bowman S, Breckler S, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015;348(6242):1422–1425. doi: 10.1126/science.aab237426113702
3. Nosek B, Lakens D, Registered Reports. Social Psychology. 2014;45(3):137–141.
4. Meyer MN, Chabris C, Why Psychologists’ Food Fight Matters. Slate Magazine. 2014Jul31.
5. Abelson R, Beliefs Are Like Possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 1986;16(3):223–250.
6. Fetterman A, Sassenberg K, The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0143723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.014372326650842
7. Nosek B, Spies J, Motyl M, Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7(6):615–631. doi: 10.1177/174569161245905826168121
8. Begley C, Ellis L, Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483(7391):531–533. doi: 10.1038/483531a22460880
9. Anderson M, Martinson B, De Vries R, Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal. 2007;2(4):3–14.
10. Giner-Sorolla R, Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7(6):562–571. doi: 10.1177/174569161245757626168113
11. LeBel E, Campbell L, Heightened Sensitivity to Temperature Cues in Individuals With High Anxious Attachment: Real or Elusive Phenomenon?. Psychological Science. 2013;24(10):2128–2130. doi: 10.1177/095679761348698323990197
12. Vess M, Warm Thoughts: Attachment Anxiety and Sensitivity to Temperature Cues. Psychological Science. 2012;23(5):472–474. doi: 10.1177/095679761143591922491143
13. Jinha A, Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing. 2010;23(3):258–263.