Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test

Journal of Hand Surgery

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 739-744.e4

  Beckmann, James T ^a   Hung, Man ^a   Voss, Maren W ^a   Crum, Anthony B ^a   Bounsanga, Jerry ^a   Tyser, Andrew R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

computerized adaptive testing; physical function; PROMIS; psychometric; upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND (SCORE); EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PHYSICAL FUNCTION COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; UPPER LIMB; VALIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

COMPUTERS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84971612113     PISSN: 03635023     EISSN: 15316564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.04.025     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 1 Chung, K.C., Burns, P.B., Davis Sears E. outcomes research in hand surgery: where have we been and where should we go?. J Hand Surg Am 31:8 (2006), 1373–1379.
2. 2 Relman, A.S., Assessment and accountability: the third revolution in medical care. N Engl J Med 319:18 (1988), 1220–1222.
3. 3 Gay, R.E., Amadio, P.C., Johnson, J.C., Comparative responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 28:2 (2003), 250–254.
4. 4 Hudak, P.L., Amadio, P.C., Bombardier, C., Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Head). [corrected] Am J Ind Med 29:6 (1996), 602–608.
5. 5 Kotsis, S.V., Chung, K.C., Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 30:1 (2005), 81–86.
6. 6 Hsu, J.E., Nacke, E., Park, M.J., Sennett, B.J., Huffman, G.R., The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in intercollegiate athletes: validity limited by ceiling effect. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:3 (2010), 349–354.
7. 7 Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45:5 Suppl 1 (2007), S3–S11.
8. 8 Bock, R.D., A brief history of item theory response. Educ Meas 16:4 (2005), 21–33.
9. 9 Hung, M., Clegg, D.O., Greene, T., Saltzman, C.L., Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients. J Orthop Res 29:6 (2011), 947–953.
10. 10 Rose, M., Bjorner, J.B., Becker, J., Fries, J.F., Ware, J.E., Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 61:1 (2008), 17–33.
11. 11 Overbeek, C.L., Nota, S.P., Jayakumar, P., Hageman, M.G., Ring, D., The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1 (2015), 311–317.
12. 12 Tyser, A.R., Beckmann, J., Franklin, J.D., et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 39:10 (2014), 2047–2051.e4.
13. 13 Hung, M., Clegg, D.O., Greene, T., Weir, C., Saltzman, C.L., A lower extremity physical function computerized adaptive testing instrument for orthopaedic patients. Foot Ankle Int 33:4 (2012), 326–335.
14. 14 Döring, A.-C., Nota, S.P.F.T., Hageman, M.G.J.S., Ring, D.C., Measurement of upper extremity disability using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system. J Hand Surg Am 39:5 (2014), 1160–1165.
15. 15 Tavakol, M., Dennick, R., Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ 2 (2011), 53–55.
16. 16 Bond, T.G., Fox, C.M., Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2013, Psychology Press, London.
17. 17 Hung, M., Carter, M., Hayden, C., et al. Psychometric assessment of the patient activation measure short form (PAM-13) in rural settings. Qual Life Res 22:3 (2013), 521–529.
18. 18 Wright, B.D., Masters, G.N., Rating Scale Analysis. Rasch Measurement. 1982, ERIC, Ipswitch, MA.
19. 19 Beckmann, J.T., Hung, M., Bounsanger, J., Wylie, J.D., Granger, E.K., Tashjian, R.Z., Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:12 (2015), 1961–1967.
20. 20 Hung, M., Franklin, J.D., Hon, S.D., Cheng, C., Conrad, J., Saltzman, C.L., Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements. Foot Ankle Int 35:1 (2014), 1–7.
21. 21 Hung, M., Nickisch, F., Beals, T.C., Greene, T., Clegg, D.O., Saltzman, C.L., New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: computerized adaptive testing. Foot Ankle Int 33:8 (2012), 621–626.
22. 22 Hung, M., Stuart, A.R., Higgins, T.F., Saltzman, C.L., Kubiak, E.N., Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma 28:8 (2014), 439–443.
23. 23 Beaton, D.E., Katz, J.N., Fossel, A.H., Wright, J.G., Tarasuk, V., Bombardier, C., Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14:2 (2001), 128–146.
24. 24 Doring, A.C., Nota, S.P., Hageman, M.G., Ring, D.C., Measurement of upper extremity disability using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. J Hand Surg Am 39:6 (2014), 1160–1165.