Climatic thresholds shape northern high-latitude fire regimes and imply vulnerability to future climate change

Ecography

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 606-617

  Young, Adam M ^a   Higuera, Philip E ^b   Duffy, Paul A ^c   Hu, Feng Sheng ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^c Neptune and Company Inc   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^e ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT; BOREAL FOREST; CARBON CYCLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CMIP; ECOREGION; FIRE BEHAVIOR; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LATITUDE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; THRESHOLD; TUNDRA; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY; VULNERABILITY; WILDFIRE;

ALASKA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84971602118     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.02205     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ali, A. A. et al. 2012. Control of the multimillennial wildfire size in boreal North America by spring climatic conditions. – Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109: 20966–20970.
2. Baker, W. L. 2009. Fire ecology in Rocky Mountain landscapes. – Island Press.
3. Balshi, M. S. et al. 2009. Assessing the response of area burned to changing climate in western boreal North America using a multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) approach. – Global Change Biol. 15: 578–600.
4. Beck, P. S. A. et al. 2011. Changes in forest productivity across Alaska consistent with biome shift. – Ecol. Lett. 14: 373–379.
5. Bond-Lamberty, B. et al. 2007. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance. – Nature 450: 89–92.
6. Boulanger, Y. et al. 2013. Fire regime zonation under current and future climate over eastern Canada. – Ecol. Appl. 23: 904–923.
7. Chipman, M. L. et al. 2015. Spatiotemporal patterns of tundra fires: late-Quaternary charcoal records from Alaska. – Biogeosciences 12: 4017–4027.
8. Duffy, P. A. et al. 2005. Impacts of large-scale atmospheric-ocean variability on Alaskan fire season severity. – Ecol. Appl. 15: 1317–1330.
9. Elith, J. and Graham, C. H. 2009. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. – Ecography 32: 66–77.
10. Elith, J. et al. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. – J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 802–813.
11. Eugster, W. et al. 2000. Land-atmosphere energy exchange in Arctic tundra and boreal forest: available data and feedbacks to climate. – Global Change Biol. 6: 84–115.
12. Euskirchen, E. S. et al. 2009. Changes in vegetation in northern Alaska under scenarios of climate change, 2003–2100: implications for climate feedbacks. – Ecol. Appl. 19: 1022–1043.
13. Flannigan, M. D. et al. 2009. Implications of changing climate for global wildland fire. – Int. J. Wildland Fire 18: 483–507.
14. Fowler, H. J. et al. 2007. Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. – Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1547–1578.
15. Friedman, J. H. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. – Ann. Stat. 29: 1189–1232.
16. Harris, I. et al. 2014. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 dataset. – Int. J. Climatol. 34: 623–642.
17. Héon, J. et al. 2014. Resistance of the boreal forest to high burn rates. – Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111: 13888–13893.
18. Higuera, P. E. et al. 2008. Frequent fires in ancient shrub tundra: implications of paleorecords for arctic environmental change. – PLoS One 3: e0001744.
19. Higuera, P. E. et al. 2009. Vegetation mediated the impacts of postglacial climate change on fire regimes in the south-central Brooks Range, Alaska. – Ecol. Monogr. 79: 201–219.
20. Higuera, P. E. et al. 2011a. Variability of tundra fire regimes in Arctic Alaska: millennial scale patterns and ecological implications. – Ecol. Appl. 21: 3211–3226.
21. Higuera, P. E. et al. 2011b. Tundra fire history over the past 6000 years in the Noatak National Preserve, northwestern Alaska. – Alaska Park Sci. 10: 37–41.
22. Homer, C. et al. 2007. Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. – Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 73: 337–341.
23. Hu, F. S. et al. 2010. Tundra burning in Alaska: linkages to climatic change and sea-ice retreat. – J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 115: G04002.
24. Hu, F. S. et al. 2015. Arctic tundra fires: natural variability and responses to climate change. – Front. Ecol. Environ. 13: 369–377.
25. Jimenez-Valverde, A. 2012. Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling. – Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21: 498–507.
26. Johnstone, J. F. et al. 2010. Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska. – Can. J. For. Res. 40: 1302–1312.
27. Jones, B. M. et al. 2013. Identification of unrecognized tundra fire events on the north slope of Alaska. – J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118: 1334–1344.
28. Kasischke, E. S. et al. 2002. Analysis of the patterns of large fires in the boreal forest region of Alaska. – Int. J. Wildland Fire 11: 131–144.
29. Kasischke, E. S. et al. 2010. Alaska's changing fire regime – implications for the vulnerability of its boreal forests. – Can. J. For. Res. 40: 1313–1324.
30. Kelly, R. et al. 2013. Recent burning of boreal forests exceeds fire regime limits of the past 10,000 years. – Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110: 13055–13060.
31. Kelly, R. et al. 2016. Palaeodata-informed modelling of large carbon losses from recent burning of boreal forests. – Nat. Clim. Change 6: 79–82.
32. Krawchuk, M. A. and Moritz, M. A. 2011. Constraints on global fire activity vary across a resource gradient. – Ecology 92: 121–132.
33. Krawchuk, M. A. et al. 2009. Global pyrogeography: the current and future distribution of wildfire. – PLoS One 4: e5102.
34. Mack, M. C. et al. 2011. Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire. – Nature 475: 489–492.
35. McGuire, A. D. et al. 1995. Equilibrium responses of soil carbon to climate change: empirical and process-based estimates. – J. Biogeogr. 22: 785–796.
36. McGuire, A. D. et al. 2009. Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change. – Ecol. Monogr. 79: 523–555.
37. Moritz, M. A. et al. 2012. Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity. – Ecosphere 3: art49.
38. Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. 2011. Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities. – Environ. Res. Lett. 6: 045509.
39. Nowacki G. et al. 2001. Ecoregions of Alaska. – U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-297 (map).
40. Overland, J. E. et al. 2014. Future Arctic climate changes: adaptation and mitigation time scales. – Earth's Future 2: 68–74.
41. Parisien, M. A. et al. 2011. Scale-dependent controls on the area burned in the boreal forest of Canada, 1980–2005. – Ecol. Appl. 21: 789–805.
42. Parisien, M. A. et al. 2014. An analysis of controls on fire activity in boreal Canada: comparing models built with different temporal resolutions. – Ecol. Appl. 24: 1341–1356.
43. Paritsis, J. et al. 2013. Habitat distribution modeling reveals vegetation flammability and land use as drivers of wildfire in SW Patagonia. – Ecosphere 4: art53.
44. Pearson, R. G. et al. 2013. Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change. – Nat. Clim. Change 3: 673–677.
45. Pfeiffer, M. et al. 2013. A model for global biomass burning in preindustrial time: LPJ-LMfire (v1.0). – Geosci. Model. Dev. 6: 643–685.
46. Randerson, J. T. et al. 2012. Global burned area and biomass burning emissions from small fires. – J. Geophys. Res. 117: G04012.
47. Ridgeway, G. with contributions from others 2015. gbm: generalized boosted regression models. – R package ver. 2.1.1, < http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gbm >.
48. Riley, S. J. et al. 1999. A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. – Intermountain J. Sci. 5: 23–27.
49. Rocha, A. V. and Shaver, G. R. 2011. Postfire energy exchange in arctic tundra: the importance and climatic implications of burn severity. – Global Change Biol. 17: 2831–2841.
50. Rocha, A. V. et al. 2012. The footprint of Alaskan tundra fires during the past half-century: implications for surface properties and radiative forcing. – Environ. Res. Lett. 7: 044039.
51. Rupp, D. E. et al. 2013. Evaluation of CMIP5 20th century climate simulations for the Pacific Northwest USA. – J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118: 10884–10906.
52. Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning, University of Alaska 2015a. Historical monthly and derived precipitation products – 2 km CRU TS. – < http://ckan.snap.uaf.edu/dataset/historical-monthly-and-derived-precipitation-products-2-km-cru-ts >, accessed January 2015.
53. Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning, University of Alaska 2015b. Projected monthly and derived precipitation products – 2 km CMIP5/AR5. – , accessed January 2015.
54. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. 2008. Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change: implications for the global carbon cycle. – Bioscience 58: 701–714.
55. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. 2015. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. – Nature 520: 171–179.
56. Selkowitz, D. J. and Stehman, S. V. 2011. Thematic accuracy of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2001 land cover for Alaska. – Remote Sens. Environ. 115: 1401–1407.
57. Serreze, M. C. and Barry, R. G. 2011. Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: a research synthesis. – Global Planet. Change 77: 85–96.
58. Strauss, D. et al. 1989. Do one percent of forest fires cause 99-percent of the damage. – For. Sci. 35: 319–328.
59. Thornthwaite, C. W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. – Geogr. Rev. 38: 55–94.
60. Turetsky, M. R. et al. 2011. Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands. – Nat. Geosci. 4: 27–31.
61. Turner, M. G. and Romme, W. H. 1994. Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems. – Landscape Ecol. 9: 59–77.
62. USGS 1997. Alaska 300 m digital elevation model. – Anchorage, AK, U.S. Geological Survey – EROS Alaska Field Office, < http://agdcftp1.wr.usgs.gov/pub/projects/dem/300m/akdem300m.tar.gz >.
63. van Leeuwen, T. T. et al. 2014. Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database. – Biogeosciences 11: 7305–7329.
64. Walker, D. A. et al. 2005. The circumpolar Arctic vegetation map. – J. Veg. Sci. 16: 267–282.
65. Walsh, J. E. et al. 2008. Global climate model performance over Alaska and Greenland. – J. Climatol. 21: 6156–6174.
66. Willmott, C. J. et al. 1985. Climatology of the terrestrial seasonal water cycle. – J. Climatol. 5: 589–606.
67. Young, A. M. et al. 2016. Data from: Climatic thresholds shape northern high-latitude fire regimes and imply vulnerability to future climate change. – Dryad Digital Repository, < http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.r217r>.