Measuring the adequacy of antenatal health care: A national cross-sectional study in Mexico;Mesurer le caractère adéquat des soins prénataux: Une étude transversale nationale au Mexique;Medición de la idoneidad de la atención sanitaria prenatal: Un estudio transversal nacional en México

Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 452-461

  Heredia Pi, Ileana ^a   Servan Mori, Edson ^a   Darney, Blair G ^a   Reyes Morales, Hortensia ^b   Lozano, Rafael ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

^b Federico Gomez Children's Hospital   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; MATERNAL HEALTH; PREGNANCY; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL CARE; MEXICO; NUTRITION; PRENATAL CARE; PROBABILITY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL STATUS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PREGNANCY; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84971492677     PISSN: 00429686     EISSN: 15640604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.15.168302     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Austin A, Langer A, Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Approaches to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health care: an overview of the evidence. Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 4;11 Suppl 2:S1. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S1 PMID: 25209614
2. Villar J, Ba’aqeel H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Miguel Belizán J, Farnot U, et al. WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1551-64. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X PMID: 11377642
3. WHO statement on antenatal care: January 2011 (WHO/RHR/11.12). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2011/WHO_RHR_11.12_eng.pdf [cited 2013 April 9].
4. Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL, Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Lawn JE. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9 Suppl 1:S7. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-S1-S7 PMID: 19426470
5. Kerber KJ, de Graft-Johnson JE, Bhutta ZA, Okong P, Starrs A, Lawn JE. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1358-69. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5 PMID: 17933651
6. Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Vogel J, Carroli G, Lumbiganon P, Qureshi Z, et al. Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health): a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1747-55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60686-8 PMID: 23683641
7. Tunçalp, Were W M, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gülmezoglu AM, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1045-9. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13451 PMID: 25929823
8. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
9. Human rights indicators: a guide to measurement and implementation. New York: United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner; 2012. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Human_rights_indicators_en.pdf [cited 2016 Feb 7].
10. Strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: http://www.everywomaneverychild.org/images/EPMM_final_report_2015.pdf [cited 2016 Feb 7].
11. van den Broek NR, Graham WJ. Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG. 2009 Oct;116 Suppl 1:18-21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02333.x PMID: 19740165
12. Heredia-Pi I, Serván-Mori E, Reyes-Morales H, Lozano R. [Gaps in the continuum of care during pregnancy and delivery in Mexico]. Salud Publica Mex. 2013 Suppl 2:S249-58. Spanish. PMID: 24626705
13. Mohamed AA, Gadir EO, Elsadig YM. Quality of antenatal care provided for pregnant women in Ribat university hospital, Khartoum. Sudanese J Public Health. 2011;6(2):51-5.
14. Tran TK, Gottvall K, Nguyen HD, Ascher H, Petzold M. Factors associated with antenatal care adequacy in rural and urban contexts-results from two health and demographic surveillance sites in Vietnam. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):40. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-40 PMID: 22335834
15. Kessner DM, Singer J, Kalk CE, Schlesinger ER, editors. Infant death: an analysis by maternal risk and health care. Washington: Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Sciences; 1973.
16. Alexander GR, Cornely DA. Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med. 1987 Sep-Oct;3(5):243-53.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.001 PMID: 3452362
17. Kotelchuck M. The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1486-9. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.84.9.1486 PMID: 8092377
18. Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura SJ, Frigoletto FD. The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, using different prenatal care indices. JAMA. 1998 May 27;279(20):1623-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.20.1623 PMID: 9613911
19. Koroukian SM, Rimm AA. The “adequacy of prenatal care utilization” (APNCU) index to study low birth weight: is the index biased? J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;55(3):296-305.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.20.1623 PMID: 9613911
20. VanderWeele TJ, Lantos JD, Siddique J, Lauderdale DS. A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):438-45. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.001 PMID: 18945589
21. Trinh LTT, Michael John D, Byles J. Antenatal care adequacy in three provinces of Vietnam: Long An, Ben Tre, and Quang Ngai. Public Health Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug;121 (4): 468-75. PMID: 16827450
22. Hodgins S, D’Agostino A. The quality-coverage gap in antenatal care: toward better measurement of effective coverage. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 May;2(2):173-81. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00176 PMID: 25276575
23. Romero-Martínez M, Shamah-Levy T, Franco-Núñez A, Villalpando S, Cuevas-Nasu L, Gutiérrez JP, et al. [National health and nutrition survey 2012: design and coverage]. Salud Pública de México. 2013;55 Suppl 2:S332-40. Spanish.
24. Encuesta nacional de salud y nutrición 2012. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2012. Available from: http://ensanut.insp.mx/basesdoctos.php [cited 2016 Mar 17].
25. Atención a la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio a recién nacidos. Criterios y procedimientos para la prestación del servicio. (Norma Oficial Mexicana, NOM-007-SSA2-1993). Mexico City: Secretaría de Salud; 1995. Available from: http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/007ssa23.html [cited 2016 Mar 12].
26. Kyei NN, Chansa C, Gabrysch S. Quality of antenatal care in Zambia: a national assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):151. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-151 PMID: 23237601
27. Ikeoluwapo OA, Osakinle DC, Osakinle EO. Quality assessment of the practice of focused antenatal care (FANC) in rural and urban primary health centres in Ekiti state. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;3:319-26. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2013.33059
28. Beeckman K, Louckx F, Putman K, Beeckman K. Content and timing of antenatal care: predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of antenatal care trajectories. Eur J Public Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):67-73. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks020 PMID: 22628457
29. Indicadores socioeconómicos de los pueblos indígenas de México. Mexico City: Comisión Nacional de Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas; 2002. Available from: http://www.cdi.gob.mx/ [cited 2016 Mar 12].
30. Kolenikov S, Angeles G. The use of discrete data in PCA: theory, simulations, and applications to socioeconomic indices. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina; 2004.
31. McKenzie DJ. Measuring inequality with asset indicators. J Popul Econ. 2005;18(2):229-60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00148-005-0224-7
32. Índice de marginación por localidad 2010. Mexico City: Consejo Nacional de Población; 2010. Available from: http://www.conapo.gob.mx/en/CONAPO/Indice:de_Marginacion_por_Localidad_2010 [cited 2016 Mar 12].
33. Long JS, Freese J. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station: Stata Press; 2006.
34. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219 PMID: 14630762
35. Donabedian A. The quality of medical care. Science. 1978 May 26;200(4344):856-64. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.417400 PMID: 417400
36. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x PMID: 16279964
37. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30; 260 (12): 1743-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 PMID: 3045356
38. Morestin F, Bicaba A, Sermé JD, Fournier P. Evaluating quality of obstetric care in low-resource settings: building on the literature to design tailor-made evaluation instruments-an illustration in Burkina Faso. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):20. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-20 PMID: 20089170
39. Maxwell RJ. Prospectus in NHS management: quality assessments in health. BMJ. 1984;288:148-72.
40. Mosadeghrad AM. A conceptual framework for quality of care. Mater Sociomed. 2012;24(4):251-61. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2012.24.251-261 PMID: 23922534
41. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10). Available from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10 [cited 2016 Mar 12]