Nomogram prediction for survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Head and Neck

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 1826-1831

  Bobdey, Saurabh ^a   Balasubramaniam, Ganesh ^a   Mishra, Prabhashankar ^a  

^a TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

nomogram; oral cavity cancer; outcome prognosis; predictive tool; survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE METASTASIS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMORBIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORTALITY; MOUTH SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; NOMOGRAM; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PERINEURAL INVASION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL PREDICTION; SURVIVAL RATE; THICKNESS; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEAD AND NECK TUMOR; INDIA; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TUMOR INVASION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; INDIA; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NOMOGRAMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84971468340     PISSN: 10433074     EISSN: 10970347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hed.24507     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2012, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed January 3, 2016.
2. Denoix PF. Tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM). Paris, France. Bull Inst Nat Hyg 1944; Ref Type: Serial (Book, Monograph). pp 1–69.
3. Patel SG, Lydiatt WM. Staging of head and neck cancers: is it time to change the balance between the ideal and the practical? J Surg Oncol 2008;97:653–657.
4. Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Hermans J, Molenaar J, Briaire JJ, le Cessie S. Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2001;23:718–724.
5. Burke HB, Henson DE. The American Joint Committee on Cancer. Criteria for prognostic factors and for an enhanced prognostic system. Cancer 1993;72:3131–3135.
6. Montero PH, Yu C, Palmer FL, et al. Nomograms for preoperative prediction of prognosis in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2014;120:214–221.
7. Piccirillo JF. Purposes, problems, and proposals for progress in cancer staging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:145–149.
8. Okuyemi OT, Piccirillo JF, Spitznagel E. TNM staging compared with a new clinicopathological model in predicting oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma survival. Head Neck 2014;36:1481–1489.
9. Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1364–1370.
10. Polterauer S, Grimm C, Hofstetter G, et al. Nomogram prediction for overall survival of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 2012;107:918–924.
11. Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:1140–1151.
12. Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AM, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:766–771.
13. Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Wei LJ. On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med 2011;30:1105–1117.
14. Zlotnik A, Abraira V. A general-purpose nomogram generator for predictive logistic regression models. Stata J 2015;15:537–546.
15. Feinstein AR. The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. J Chronic Dis 1970;23:445–468.
16. Well CK, Stoller JK, Feinstein AR. Horwitz RI. Comorbid and clinical determinants of prognosis in endometrial cancer. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:2004–2009.
17. Satariano WA, Ragland DR. The effect of comorbidity on 3-year survival of women with primary breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 1994;120:104–110.
18. Ribeiro KC, Kowalski LP, Latorre MR. Impact of comorbidity, symptoms, and patients' characteristics on the prognosis of oral carcinomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:1079–1085.
19. Amit M, Yen TC, Liao CT, et al. Improvement in survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: an international collaborative study. Cancer 2013;119:4242–4248.
20. Larsen SR, Johansen J, Sørensen JA, Krogdahl A. The prognostic significance of histological features in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2009;38:657–662.
21. Kademani D, Bell RB, Bagheri S, et al. Prognostic factors in intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: the influence of histologic grade. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1599–1605.
22. Woolgar JA. Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2006;42:229–239.
23. O'Brien CJ, Lauer CS, Fredricks S, et al. Tumor thickness influences prognosis of T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer---but what thickness ? Head Neck 2003;25:937–945.
24. Ganly I, Goldstein D, Carlson DL, et al. Long-term regional control and survival in patients with “low-risk,” early stage oral tongue cancer managed by partial glossectomy and neck dissection without postoperative radiation: the importance of tumor thickness. Cancer 2013;119:1168–1176.
25. Yuen AP, Lam KY, Wei WI, et al. A comparison of the prognostic significance of tumor diameter, length, width, thickness, area, volume, and clinicopathological features of oral tongue carcinoma. Am J Surg 2000;180:139–143.
26. Howaldt HP, Kainz M, Euler B, Vorast H. Proposal for modification of the TNM staging classification for cancer of the oral cavity. DOSAK. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999;27:275–288.
27. Mishra RC, Parida G, Mishra TK, Mohanty S. Tumour thickness and relationship to locoregional failure in cancer of the buccal mucosa. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999;25:186–189.
28. Ling W, Mijiti A, Moming A. Survival pattern and prognostic factors of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: a retrospective analysis of 210 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:775–785.
29. Gonzalez–Moles MA, Esteban F, Rodriguez–Archilla A, Ruiz–Avila I, Gonzalez–Moles S. Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol 2002;38:394–397.
30. International Consortium for Outcome Research (ICOR) in Head, Neck Cancer, Ebrahimi A, Gil Z, et al. Primary tumor staging for oral cancer and a proposed modification incorporating depth of invasion: an international multicenter retrospective study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140:1138–1148.
31. Fielding LP, Henson DE. Multiple prognostic factors and outcome analysis in patients with cancer. Communication from the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 1993;71:2426–2429.
32. Ahmad K, Kim YH, Fayos JV. Head and neck cancer. Reliability of American Joint Committee's staging system as prognostic indicator. Acta Oncol 1987;26:173–174.
33. Kattan MW. Nomograms are superior to staging and risk grouping systems for identifying high-risk patients: preoperative application in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2003;13:111–116.
34. de Cássia Braga Ribeiro K, Kowalski LP, Latorre Mdo R. Perioperative complications, comorbidities, and survival in oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:219–228.
35. Luo XL, He W, Huang H, et al. Design of a prognostic score model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 2015;37:624–629.
36. Bailey BJ. Beyond the ‘new’ TNM classification. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;117:369–370; discussion 371.