Discriminating between native norway spruce and invasive sitka spruce-A comparison of multitemporal Landsat 8 imagery, aerial images and airborne laser scanner data

Remote Sensing

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Hauglin, Marius ^a   Ørka, Hans Ole ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Invasive species; Tree species classification

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION TREES; FORESTRY; LASER APPLICATIONS; PLANTS (BOTANY); REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

AIRBORNE LASER SCANNERS; AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION METHODS; CLASSIFICATION MODELS; INVASIVE SPECIES; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; TREE SPECIES;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84971449442     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs8050363     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Gederaas, L.; Moen, T.L.; Skjelseth, S.; Larsen, L.-K. Alien Species in Norway-with the Norwegian Black List 2012; The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre: Trondheim, Norway, 2012.
2. Bradley, B. Remote detection of invasive plants: A review of spectral, textural and phenological approaches. Biol. Invasions 2014, 16, 1411-1425.
3. Turner, W.; Spector, S.; Gardiner, N.; Fladeland, M.; Sterling, E.; Steininger, M. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 306-314.
4. Wulder, M.A.; LeDrew, E.F.; Franklin, S.E.; Lavigne, M.B. Aerial Image Texture Information in the Estimation of Northern Deciduous and Mixed Wood Forest Leaf Area Index (LAI). Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 64, 64-76.
5. Ørka, H.O.; Næsset, E.; Bollandsås, O.M. Classifying species of individual trees by intensity and structure features derived from airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 1163-1174.
6. Carter, G.A.; Lucas, K.L.; Blossom, G.A.; Lassitter, C.L.; Holiday, D.M.; Mooneyhan, D.S.; Fastring, D.R.; Holcombe, T.R.; Griffith, J.A. Remote sensing and mapping of tamarisk along the Colorado River, USA: A comparative use of summer-acquired Hyperion, Thematic Mapper and QuickBird data. Remote Sens. 2009, 1, 318-329.
7. Fuller, D.O. Remote detection of invasive Melaleuca trees (Melaleuca quinquenervia) in South Florida with multispectral IKONOS imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26, 1057-1063.
8. Asner, G.P.; Knapp, D.E.; Kennedy-Bowdoin, T.; Jones, M.O.; Martin, R.E.; Boardman, J.; Hughes, R.F. Invasive species detection in Hawaiian rainforests using airborne imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 1942-1955.
9. Resasco, J.; Hale, A.; Henry, M.; Gorchov, D. Detecting an invasive shrub in a deciduous forest understory using late-fall Landsat sensor imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2007, 28, 3739-3745.
10. Huang, C.; Asner, G. Applications of Remote Sensing to Alien Invasive Plant Studies. Sensors 2009, 9, 4869-4889.
11. Donoghue, D.N.M.; Watt, P.J.; Cox, N.J.; Dunford, R.W.; Wilson, J.; Stables, S.; Smith, S. An evaluation of the use of satellite data for monitoring early development of young Sitka spruce plantation forest growth. Forestry 2004, 77, 383-396.
12. Vauhkonen, J.; Ørka, H.O.; Holmgren, J.; Dalponte, M.; Heinzel, J.; Koch, B. Tree Species Recognition Based on Airborne Laser Scanning and Complementary Data Sources. In Forestry Applications of Airborne Laser Scanning; Managing Forest Ecosystems; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 135-156.
13. Donoghue, D.N.M.; Watt, P.J.; Cox, N.J.; Wilson, J. Remote sensing of species mixtures in conifer plantations using LiDAR height and intensity data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 110, 509-522.
14. Asner, G.P.; Jones, M.O.; Martin, R.E.; Knapp, D.E.; Hughes, R.F. Remote sensing of native and invasive species in Hawaiian forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 1912-1926.
15. Baig, M.H.A.; Zhang, L.; Shuai, T.; Tong, Q. Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance. Remote Sens. Lett. 2014, 5, 423-431.
16. Axelsson, P. DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2000, 33, 111-118.
17. Axelsson, P. Processing of laser scanner data-Algorithms and applications. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 1999, 54, 138-147.
18. Kauth, R.; Thomas, G. The Tasselled Cap-A Graphic Description of the Spectral-Temporal Development of Agricultural Crops as Seen by LANDSAT. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data; Purdue University: West Lafayette, IN, USA, 1976.
19. Haralick, R.M.; Shanmugam, K.; Dinstein, I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1973, 6, 610-621.
20. Zvoleff, A. Glcm: Calculate Textures from Grey-Level co-Occurrence Matrices (GLCMs) in R, 2015. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glcm/(accessed on 19 January 2016).
21. R Development Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Development Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2011.
22. Næsset, E. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 80, 88-99.
23. Korpela, I.; Ørka, H.O.; Maltamo, M.; Tokola, T.; Hyyppä, J. Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR-Effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type. Silv. Fenn. 2010, 44, 319-339.
24. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5-32.
25. Hastie, T.J.; Tibshirani, R.J.; Friedman, J.H. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
26. Liaw, A.;Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, 2002, 2, 18-22.
27. Meyer, D.; Dimitriadou, E.; Hornik, K.; Weingessel, A.; Leisch, F. e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wien. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071 (accessed on 19 January 2016).
28. Calcagno, V. glmulti: Model selection and multimodel inference made easy. R package version 1.0.7. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmulti (accessed on 19 January 2016).
29. Landis, J.R.; Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33, 159-174.
30. Krzanowski, W.J.; Hand, D.J. ROC Curves for Continuous Data, 1st ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009.
31. Dalponte, M.; Orka, H.O.; Gobakken, T.; Gianelle, D.; Naesset, E. Tree species classification in boreal forests with hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 51, 2632-2645.
32. Tomppo, E.; Olsson, H.; Ståhl, G.; Nilsson, M.; Hagner, O.; Katila, M. Combining national forest inventory field plots and remote sensing data for forest databases. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 1982-1999.
33. Gjertsen, A.K. Accuracy of forest mapping based on Landsat TM data and a kNN-based method. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 110, 420-430.