Potential barriers to the diffusion of surgical innovation

JAMA Surgery

Volumn 151, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 403-404

  Gani, Faiz ^a   Ford, Daniel E ^b   Pawlik, Timothy M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MARKET; NONHUMAN; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGEON; SURGICAL INNOVATION; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; THORAX SURGERY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; HEALTH ECONOMICS; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; SURGERY; TRENDS;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ECONOMICS, MEDICAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 84971299696     PISSN: 21686254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0030     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA. 2003;289(15):1969-1975.
2. MillerME, Siegler M, Angelos P. Ethical issues in surgical innovation.World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1638-1643.
3. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs - the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701-704.
4. Cohen DJ. Cardiothoracic surgery at a crossroads: the impact of disruptive technologic change. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;2:35.
5. Johnson J, RogersW. Innovative surgery: the ethical challenges. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(1):9-12.
6. Angelos P. The ethical challenges of surgical innovation for patient care. Lancet. 2010;376 (9746):1046-1047.
7. Senapati S, Tu FF, Magrina JF. Power morcellators: a review of current practice and assessment of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212 (1):18-23.