Testing of the European Union exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model for annoyance due to transportation noises: The need of revised exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model

Environment International

Volumn 94, Issue , 2016, Pages 83-94

  Gille, Laure Anne ^a,b   Marquis Favre, Catherine ^b   Morel, Julien ^c  

^a CEREMA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c French Ministry of Equipment Transportation and Housing   (France)

Author keywords

Annoyance equivalents model; Combined noises; Exposure response relationship; Multilevel regression; Noise annoyance; Transportation noise

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; INTERNATIONAL LAW; NOISE POLLUTION; ROADS AND STREETS; SURVEYS;

ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA; COMBINED NOISE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EXPOSURE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS; MULTILEVEL REGRESSION; NOISE ANNOYANCE; QUALITY OF PREDICTIONS;

FORECASTING;

EUROPEAN UNION; IN SITU TEST; NOISE POLLUTION; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROAD TRAFFIC;

ADULT; AGED; AIRCRAFT; ANNOYANCE; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMAN; NOISE MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAILWAY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC NOISE; VERY ELDERLY; ADOLESCENT; CAR; CITY; EUROPEAN UNION; FRANCE; MIDDLE AGED; THEORETICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

FRANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AIRCRAFT; AUTOMOBILES; CITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EUROPEAN UNION; FRANCE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NOISE, TRANSPORTATION; RAILROADS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84971268639     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.027     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alayrac M., Marquis-Favre C., Viollon S. Total annoyance from an industrial noise source with a main spectral component combined with a background noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130(1):189-199.
2. Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Pershagen G., Cadum E., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., Dudley M.-L., Marohn H.-D., Swart W., Breugelmans O., Bluhm G., Selander J., Vigna-Taglianti F., Pisani S., Haralabidis A., Dimakopoulou K., Zachos I., Järup L. Annoyance due to aircraft noise has increased over the years - results of the HYENA study. Environ. Int. 2009, 35:1169-1176.
3. Birk M., Ivina O., von Klot S., Babish W., Heinrich J. Road traffic noise: self-reported noise annoyance versus GIS modeled road traffic noise exposure. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13:3237-3245.
4. Brown A.L., Lam K.C., van Kamp I. Quantification of the exposure and effects of road traffic noise in a dense Asian city: a comparison with western cities. Environ. Health 2015, 14-22.
5. Ecotière D., Champelovier P., Marquis-Favre C., Morel J., Olny X., Philipps-Bertin C., Vincent B. Multi-exposition au bruit des transports - application et évaluation d'une méthode opérationnelle d'identification de la gêne en situation de multi-exposition. Combined Transportation Noise Exposure - Application and Evaluation of an Operational Method to Identify Noise Annoyance in Combined Exposure 2014, (106 pp.).
6. Eriksson C., Nilsson M.E., Stenkvist D., Bellander T., Pershagen G. Residential traffic noise exposure assessment: application and evaluation of European Environmental Noise Directive maps. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2012, 1-8.
7. European Commission Position Paper on Dose Response Relationships Between Transportation Noise and Annoyance 2002, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, (40 pp.).
8. Groothuis-Oudshoorn C.G.M., Miedema H.M.E. Multilevel grouped regression for analyzing self-reported health in relation to environmental factors: the model and its application. Biom. J. 2006, 48(1):67-82.
9. IFOP Les Français et les nuisances sonores (available on, (date last viewed 01/28/2015), 85 pp. http://www.ifop.com.
10. ISO Acoustics - Assessment of Noise Annoyance by Means of Social and Socio-acoustic Survey 2003, (ISO/TS 15666:2003, 23 pp.).
11. Jakovljevic B., Paunovic K., Belojevic G. Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population. Environ. Int. 2009, 35:552-556.
12. Janssen S.A., Vos H., van Kempen E.E.M.M., Breugelmans O.R.P., Miedema H.M.E. Trends in aircraft noise annoyance: the role of study and sample characteristics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 129(4):1953-1962.
13. Klæboe R., Amundsen A.H., Fyhri A., Solberg S. Road traffic noise - the relationship between noise exposure and noise annoyance in Norway. Appl. Acoust. 2004, 65:893-912.
14. Lim C., Kim J., Hong J., Lee S. The relationship between railway noise and community annoyance in Korea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120(4):2037-2042.
15. Lim C., Kim J., Hong J., Lee S. The relationship between civil aircraft noise and community annoyance in Korea. J. Sound Vib. 2007, 299:575-586.
16. Marquis-Favre C., Morel J. A simulated environment experiment on annoyance due to combined road traffic and industrial noises. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(7):8413-8433.
17. Miedema H.M.E. Relationship between exposure to multiple noise sources and noise annoyance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116(2):949-957.
18. Miedema H.M.E., Oudshoorn C.G.M. Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109(4):409-416.
19. Miedema H.M.E., Vos H. Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 113(3):1492-1504.
20. Miedema H.M.E., Vos H. Noise annoyance from stationnary sources: relationships with exposure metric day-evening-night level (DENL) and their confidence intervals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116(1):334-343.
21. Morel J., Marquis-Favre C., Gille L.-A. Noise annoyance assessment of various urban road vehicle pass-by noises in isolation and combined with industrial noise: a laboratory study. App. Acust. 2016, 101:45-57.
22. Nguyen T.L., Yano T., Nishimura T., Sato T. Social survey on community response to aircraft noise in Ho Chi Minh City. J. Temporal Des. Archit. Environ. 2009, 9(1):154-157.
23. Nguyen T.L., Yano T., Nguyen H.Q., Nishimura T., Fukushima H., Sato T., Morihara T., Hashimoto Y. Community response to aircraft noise in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi. Appl. Acoust. 2011, 72:814-822.
24. Nguyen T.L., Nguyen H.Q., Yano T., Nishimura T., Sato T., Morihara T., Hashimoto Y. Comparison of models to predict annoyance from combined noise in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi. Appl. Acoust. 2012, 73(9):952-959.
25. Parlement Européen Et Conseil Européen Directive 2002/49/CE relative à l'évaluation et à la gestion du bruit dans l'environnement. J. Off. Commun. Eur. 2002, 189:12-25.
26. Pennig S., Schady A. Railway noise annoyance: exposure-response relationships and testing a theoritical model by structural equation analysis. Noise Health 2014, 16(73):388-399.
27. Phan H.Y.T., Yano T., Phan H.A.T., Nishimura T., Sato T., Hashimoto Y. Community responses to road traffic noise in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. Appl. Acoust. 2010, 71(2):107-114.
28. Pierrette M., Marquis-Favre C., Morel J., Rioux L., Vallet M., Viollon S., Moch A. Noise annoyance from industrial and road traffic combined noises: a survey and a total annoyance model comparison. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012, 32(2):178-186.
29. Pierrette M., Marquis-Favre C., Morel J., Rioux L., Vallet M., Viollon S., Moch A. Corrigendum to noise annoyance from industrial and road traffic combined noises: a survey and a total annoyance model comparison. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012, 32(3):285.
30. Raw G.J., Griffiths I.D. Individual differences in response to road traffic noise. J. Sound Vib. 1988, 121(3):463-471.
31. Sandrock S., Griefahn B., Kaczmarek T., Hafke H., Preis A., Gjesland T. Experimental studies on annoyance caused by noises from trams and buses. J. Sound Vib. 2008, 313:908-919.
32. Saporta, C., (1990). Probabilités, Analyse Des Données et Statistique, Ed. Technip.
33. Trollé A., Marquis-Favre C., Klein A. Short-term annoyance due to tramway noise: determination of an acoustical indicator of annoyance via multilevel regression analysis. Acta Acust. Unit. Acust. 2014, 100:34-45.
34. Trollé A., Marquis-Favre C., Klein A. Corrigendum to: short-term annoyance due to tramway noise: determination of an acoustical indicator of annoyance via multilevel regression analysis. Acta Acust. Unit. Acust. 2015, 101:205.
35. van Kamp I., Job R.F.S., Hatfield J., Haines M., Stellato R.K., Stansfeld S.A. The role of noise sensitivity in the noise-response relation: a comparison of three international airport studies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116(6):3471-3479.
36. Vos J. Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 91(6):3330-3345.
37. World Health Organization Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise - Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe 2011, WHO Regional Office for Europe, (128 pp.).