A trajectory method for vibration based damage identification of underdetermined problems

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Chatzieleftheriou, Stavros ^a   Lagaros, Nikos D ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

damage identification; eigenfrequencies; iterative sensitivity analysis; measurements' noise and material uncertainty; optimization; trajectories

Indexed keywords

INVERSE PROBLEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STIFFNESS MATRIX; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TRAJECTORIES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VIBRATION MEASUREMENT;

DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION; EIGEN FREQUENCIES; GLOBAL STIFFNESS MATRIX; MATERIAL UNCERTAINTY; NONLINEAR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION; UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENTS; VIBRATION BASED DAMAGE IDENTIFICATIONS;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 84971247464     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1883     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock and Vibration Digest 1998; 30(2):91–105.
2. Fan W, Qiao P. Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Structural Health Monitoring 2011; 10(1):83–111.
3. Liang RY, Hu JL, Choy F. Quantitative NDE technique for assessing damages in beam structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1992; 118(7):1468–1487.
4. Hassiotis S, Jeong GD. Assessment of structural damage from natural frequency measurements. Computers & Structures 1993; 49(4):67–91.
5. Bicanic N, Chen H-P. Damage identification in framed structures using natural frequencies. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1997; 40(23):4451–4468.
6. Vestroni F, Capecchi D. Damage detection in beam structures based on frequency measurements. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2000; 126(7):761–768.
7. Kim J-T, Ryu Y-S, Cho H-M, Stubbs N. Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs mode-shape-based method. Engineering Structures 2003; 25(1):57–67.
8. Alvandi A, Cremona C. Assessment of vibration-based damage identification techniques. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2006; 292(1-2):179–202.
9. Friswell MI. Damage identification using inverse methods, philosophical transactions of the royal society A: mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences 2007; 365(1851):393–410.
10. Yang QW. A new damage identification method based on structural flexibility disassembly. Journal of Vibration and Control 2010; 17(7):1000–1008.
11. Li B, Chen X, He Z. Three steps meshing based multiple crack identification for structures and its experimental studies. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2013; 26(1):400–405.
12. Yao R, Pakzad SN. Time and frequency domain regression-based stiffness estimation and damage identification. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2014; 21(3):356–380.
13. He R-S, Hwang S-F. Damage detection by an adaptive real-parameter simulated annealing genetic algorithm. Computers and Structures 2006; 84(31-32):2231–2243.
14. Guo HY, Li ZL. A two-stage method to identify structural damage sites and extents by using evidence theory and micro-search genetic algorithm. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2009; 23(3):769–782.
15. Jeong M, Choi J-H, Koh B-H. Performance evaluation of modified genetic and swarm-based optimization algorithms in damage identification problem. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2013; 20(6):878–889.
16. Saada MM, Arafa MH, Nashef AO. Finite element model updating approach to damage identification in beams using particle swarm optimization. Engineering Optimization 2013; 45(6):677–696.
17. Begambre O, Laier JE. A hybrid particle swarm optimization – simplex algorithm (PSOS) for structural damage identification. Advances in Engineering Software 2009; 40(9):883–891.
18. Xia Y, Hao H. Statistical damage identification of structures with frequency changes. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2003; 263(4):853–870.
19. Currie D, Petrie N, Lu L. A benchmark study of dynamic damage identification in plates. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering and computational Mechanics 2012; 165(2):103–118.
20. Ellingwood BR, Galambos TV, MacGregor JG, Cornell CA. Development of a Probability-based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58. National Bureau of Standards: Washington, DC, 1980.
21. Ellingwood BR, Galambos TV. Probability-based criteria for structural design. Structural Safety 1982; 1(1):15–26.
22. EC3. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardisation: Brussels, BelgiumThe European Standard EN 1993-1-1, 2005.
23. EC8. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. European Committee for Standardisation: Brussels, BelgiumThe European Standard EN 1998-1, 2004.