Macro-level factors impacting geographic disparities in cancer screening

Health Economics Review

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-15

  Mobley, Lee R ^a   Kuo, Tzy Mey ^b   Traczynski, Jeffrey ^c   Udalova, Victoria ^d   Frech, H E ^e  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Comprehensive cancer control; Geographic disparities; Health insurance reform; Insurance regulation; Managed care spillovers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENDOSCOPY; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NURSE PRACTITIONER; POPULATION DENSITY; POVERTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE; SIGMOIDOSCOPY;

EID: 84971219389     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21911991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13561-014-0013-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun M: Cancer statistics, 2009.Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225–249.
2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A: Cancer Statistics, 2013.Cancer J Clin 2013, 63(1):11–30.
3. Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, Yood MU, Manos MM, Geiger AM, Weinmann S, Gilbert J, Mouchawar J, Leyden WA, Altaras R, Beverly RK, Casso D, Westbrook EO, Bischoff K, Zapka JG, Barlow WE: Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96(20):1518–1527.
4. American Cancer Society (ACS): Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2011. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2011. (last accessed 10 July 2011): http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerPreventionEarlyDetectionFactsFigures/ACSPC-029459.
5. Henley J, King J, German R, Richardson L, Plescia M: Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (Colon and rectum, breast, and cervix) — United States, 2004–2006.MMWR 2010, 59:SS-9. available online at www.cdc.gov/mmwr.
6. Richardson L, Tai E, Rim S, Joseph D, Plescia M: Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010.MMWR 2011, 60(26):884–889. (last accessed 10 July 2011): http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6026a4.htm?s_cid=mm6026a4_w.
7. Mobley L, Kuo M, Urato M, Subramanian S, Watson L, Anselin L: Spatial heterogeneity in cancer control planning and cancer screening behavior.Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2012, 102(5):1113–1124.
8. Mobley L, Kuo T, Watson L, Brown G: State insurance regulation and disparities in late-stage diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancer: a comprehensive multilevel analysis.Health Place 2012, 18:978–990.
9. Aday LA, Andersen R: A framework for the study of access to medical care.Health Serv Res 1974, 9:208–220.
10. Khan AA, Bhardwaj SM: Access to health care: a conceptual framework and its relevance to health care planning.Eval Health Prof 1994, 17:60–76.
11. Probst J, Moore C, Glover S, Samuels M: Person and place: the compounding effects of race/ethnicity and rurality on health.Am J Publ Health 2004, 94(10):1695–1703.
12. Cummins S, Curtis S, Diez-Roux A, Macintyre S: Understanding and representing ‘place’ in health research: a relational approach.Soc Sci Med 2007, 65(9):1825–1838.
13. Riley GF, Potosky AL, Klabunde CN, Warren JL, Ballard-Barbash R: Stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns among older women with breast cancer: a managed care and fee-for-service comparison.JAMA 1999, 281(8):720–726.
14. Haas JS, Phillips KA, Sonneborn D, McCulloch CE, Liang SY: Effect of managed care insurance on the use of preventive care for specific ethnic groups in the United States.Med Care 2002, 40(9):743–751.
15. Baker L: Managed care spillover effects.Annu Rev Publ Health 2003, 24(1):435–456.
16. Miller RH, Luft HS: Managed care plan performance since 1980.J Am Med Assoc 1994, 271(19):1512–1519.
17. Mobley L, Subramanian S, Koschinsky J, Frech HE, Clayton L, Anselin L: Managed care and the diffusion of endoscopy in fee-for-service medicare.Health Serv Res 2011, 46(6):1905–1927.
18. Decker SL, Hempstead K: Managed care penetration and quality of care: the case of breast cancer.J Health Care Finance 1999, 26(1):18–32.
19. Baker LC, Brown ML: Managed care, consolidation among health care providers, and health care: evidence from mammography.Rand J Econ 1999, 30(2):351–374.
20. Baker LC, Phillips KA, Haas JS, Liang SY, Sonneborn D: The effect of area managed care market share on cancer screening.Health Serv Res 2004, 39(6 Pt 1):1751–1772.
21. Koroukian SM, Litaker D, Dor A, Cooper GS: Use of preventive services by medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries: does spillover from managed care matter?Med Care 2005, 43:445–452.
22. Mobley L, Kuo T, Urato M, Subramanian S: Community contextual predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the USA: spatial multilevel regression analysis.Int J Health Geogr 2010, 9:44.
23. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Primary Care Workforce Facts and Stats: Overview.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD; 2012. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/primary/pcworkforce/index.html
24. Traczynski J, Udalova V: Nurse Practitioner Independence, Health Care Utilization, and Health Outcomes. Working Paper, University of Hawaii; 2013.
25. American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) State Profiles: Reforming the Health Care System. 12th edition; 2003. available online January 2014: http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/health/d17984_reform_2003.pdf.
26. National Council of State Regulators (NCSL): Managed Care State Laws and Regulations, Including Consumer and Provider Protections. Updated: March 2008; Reposted May 2010: http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/health/managed-care-state-laws.aspx.
27. Chollet D, Smieliauskas F, Konig M: Mapping State Health Insurance Markets, 2001: Structure and Change. Academy Health; 2003. http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/∽/media/publications/PDFs/mapping2001.pdf
28. STATA XTMIXED Procedure, STATA12TX, USA: StataCorp, College Station.http://www.stata.com/bookstore/stata12/pdf/xt_xtmixed.pdf.
29. Gelman A, Hill J: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY, USA; 2007.
30. Mobley L, Frech HE III: Health Insurance: Designing Products to Reduce Costs. Chapter 6. In Industry and Firm Studies. Edited by Tremblay V, Tremblay C. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe; 2007.
31. New MJ, New MJ: The Effect of State Regulations on Health Insurance Premiums: A Revised Analysis. Heritage Foundation Center for Data Analysis Report No. CDA06-04; 2006. Available at http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2006/pdf/cda06-04.pdf.
32. Congressional Budget Office (CBO): The Price Sensitivity of Demand for Nongroup Health Insurance. Background Paper; 2005. Available at /static/reportimages/79ABB18D6301D4D3C26BE05FFABD90EC.pdf.
33. Kowalski A, Congdon W, Showalter M: State health insurance regulations and the price of high-deductible policies.Forum Health Econ Policy 2008, 11(2). Available at http://econpapers.repec.org/article/bpjfhecpo/v_3a11_3ay_3a2008_3ai_3a2_3an_3a8.htm.
34. LaPierre T, Conover C, Henderson J, Seward A, Taylor B: Estimating the impact of state health insurance mandates on premium costs in the individual market.J Insur Regul 2009, 27(3):3–36.
35. Parente ST, Feldman R, Abraham J, Xu Y: Consumer Response to a National Marketplace for Individual Insurance. Final Technical Report for DHHS Contract HP-07-024; 2008. Available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/08/consumerresponse/report.pdf.
36. Weil A, Tallon J: The states’ role in national health reform.J Law Med Ethics 2008, 36(4):690–692.