A comprehensive approach to new physics simulations

European Physical Journal C

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Christensen, Neil ^a,b   De Aquino, Priscila ^c,d   Degrande, Celine ^c   Duhr, Claude ^c   Fuks, Benjamin ^e   Herquet, Michel ^f   Maltoni, Fabio ^c   Schumann, Steffen ^g  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^f NIKHEF   (Netherlands)

^g INSTITUT FÜR THEORETISCHE PHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971201204     PISSN: 14346044     EISSN: 14346052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1541-5     Document Type: Article

References (193)

1. M.L. Mangano, Understanding the Standard Model, as a bridge to the discovery of new phenomena at the LHC. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 3833-3848 (2008). [arXiv:0802.0026]
2. N. Arkani-Hamed et al., MARMOSET: The path from LHC data to the new standard model via on-shell effective theories. [arXiv:hep-ph/0703088]
3. G. Bellettini, G. Chiarelli, R. Tenchini, Top quark physics, in Proceedings, International Workshop, TOP 2008, La Biodola, Italy, May 18-24 (2008)
4. A. Pukhov et al., CompHEP: A package for evaluation of Feynman diagrams and integration over multi-particle phase space. User’s manual for version 33. [arXiv:hep-ph/9908288]
5. E. Boos et al. (CompHEP Collaboration), CompHEP 4.4: Automatic computations from Lagrangians to events. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 534, 250-259 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0403113]
6. A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.2:MSSM, structure functions, event generation, batchs, and generation of matrix elements for other packages. [arXiv:hep-ph/0412191]
7. T. Stelzer, W.F. Long, Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes. Comput. Phys. Commun. 81, 357-371 (1994). [arXiv:hep-ph/9401258]
8. F. Maltoni, T. Stelzer, MadEvent: Automatic event generation with MadGraph. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 027 (2003). [arXiv:hep-ph/0208156]
9. J. Alwall et al., MadGraph/MadEvent v4: The New Web generation. J. High Energy Phys. 09, 028 (2007). [arXiv:0706.2334]
10. J. Alwall et al., New Developments in MadGraph/MadEvent. AIP Conf. Proc. 1078, 84-89 (2009). [arXiv:0809.2410]
11. T. Gleisberg et al., SHERPA 1.alpha, a proof-of-concept version. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 056 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0311263]
12. T. Gleisberg et al., Event generation with SHERPA 1.1. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 007 (2009). [arXiv:0811.4622]
13. W. Kilian, WHIZARD 1.0: A generic Monte-Carlo integration and event generation package for multi-particle processes. Manual, LC-TOOL-2001-039
14. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, R. Pittau, A.D. Polosa, ALPGEN, a generator for hard multiparton processes in hadronic collisions. J. High Energy Phys. 07, 001 (2003). [arXiv:hep-ph/0206293]
15. A. Cafarella, C.G. Papadopoulos, M. Worek, Helac-Phegas:a generator for all parton level processes. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1941-1955 (2009). [arXiv:0710.2427]
16. T. Gleisberg, S. Hoche, Comix, a new matrix element generator. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 039 (2008). [arXiv:0808.3674]
17. T. Gleisberg, F. Krauss, Automating dipole subtraction for QCD NLO calculations. Eur. Phys. J. C 53, 501-523 (2008). [arXiv:0709.2881]
18. M.H. Seymour, C. Tevlin, TeVJet: A general framework for the calculation of jet observables in NLO QCD. arXiv:0803.2231
19. K. Hasegawa, S. Moch, P. Uwer, Automating dipole subtraction. Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 183, 268-273 (2008). [arXiv:0807.3701]
20. R. Frederix, T. Gehrmann, N. Greiner, Automation of the dipole subtraction method in MadGraph/MadEvent. J. High Energy Phys. 09, 122 (2008). [arXiv:0808.2128]
21. M. Czakon, C.G. Papadopoulos, M. Worek, Polarizing the dipoles. J. High Energy Phys. 08, 085 (2009). [arXiv:0905.0883]
22. R. Frederix, S. Frixione, F. Maltoni, T. Stelzer, Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: the FKS subtraction. J. High Energy Phys. 10, 003 (2009). [arXiv:0908.4272]
23. G. Zanderighi, Recent theoretical progress in perturbative QCD. arXiv:0810.3524
24. R.K. Ellis, K. Melnikov, G. Zanderighi, Generalized unitarity at work: first NLO QCD results for hadronic W+ 3jet production. J. High Energy Phys. 04, 077 (2009). [arXiv:0901.4101]
25. C.F. Berger et al., Precise predictions for W + 3 jet production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 222001 (2009). [arXiv:0902.2760]
26. A. van Hameren, C.G. Papadopoulos, R. Pittau, Automated oneloop calculations: a proof of concept. J. High Energy Phys. 09, 106 (2009). [arXiv:0903.4665]
27. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual. J. High Energy Phys. 05, 026 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0603175]
28. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1. Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852-867 (2008). [arXiv:0710.3820]
29. G. Corcella et al., HERWIG 6: An event generator for hadron emission reactions with interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes). J. High Energy Phys. 01, 010 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0011363]
30. M. Bahr et al., Herwig++ Physics and Manual. Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 639-707 (2008). [arXiv:0803.0883]
31. S. Catani, F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, B.R. Webber, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. J. High Energy Phys. 111, 063 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0109231]
32. F. Krauss, Matrix elements and parton showers in hadronic interactions. J. High Energy Phys. 0208, 015 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0205283]
33. S. Mrenna, P. Richardson, Matching matrix elements and parton showers with HERWIG and PYTHIA. J. High Energy Phys. 05, 040 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0312274]
34. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, M. Treccani, Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions. J. High Energy Phys. 01, 013 (2007). [arXiv:hep-ph/0611129]
35. L. Lonnblad, Correcting the colour-dipole cascade model with fixed ordermatrix elements. J. High Energy Phys. 05, 046 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0112284]
36. N. Lavesson, L. Lonnblad, W + jets matrix elements and the dipole cascade. J. High Energy Phys. 07, 054 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0503293]
37. S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann, F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements and truncated showers. J. High Energy Phys. 05, 053 (2009). [arXiv:0903.1219]
38. S. Höche et al., Matching parton showers and matrix elements. arXiv:hep-ph/0602031
39. J. Alwall et al., Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C 53, 473-500 (2008). [arXiv:0706.2569]
40. F. Krauss, A. Schalicke, S. Schumann, G. Soff, Simulating W/Z + jets production at the Tevatron. Phys. Rev. D 70, 114009 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0409106]
41. J. Alwall, S. de Visscher, F. Maltoni, QCD radiation in the production of heavy colored particles at the LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 017 (2009). [arXiv:0810.5350]
42. S. Frixione, B.R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD computations and parton shower simulations. J. High Energy Phys. 06, 029 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0204244]
43. S. Frixione, P. Nason, B.R. Webber, Matching NLO QCD and parton showers in heavy flavour production. J. High Energy Phys. 08, 007 (2003). [arXiv:hep-ph/0305252]
44. P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms. J. High Energy Phys. 11, 040 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0409146]
45. S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, E. Re, NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG. J. High Energy Phys. 07, 060 (2008). [arXiv:0805.4802]
46. S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, E. Re, NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG. J. High Energy Phys. 04, 002 (2009). [arXiv:0812.0578]
47. K. Hamilton, P. Richardson, J. Tully, A positive-weight next-toleading order Monte Carlo simulation of Drell-Yan vector boson production. J. High Energy Phys. 10, 015 (2008). [arXiv:0806.0290]
48. K. Hamilton, P. Richardson, J. Tully, A positive-weight next-toleading order Monte Carlo simulation for Higgs boson production. J. High Energy Phys. 04, 116 (2009). [arXiv:0903.4345]
49. A. Semenov, LanHEP: A package for automatic generation of Feynman rules from the Lagrangian. Comput. Phys. Commun. 115, 124-139 (1998)
50. J.D. Wells, How to find a hidden world at the large hadron collider. arXiv:0803.1243
51. M. Bowen, Y. Cui, J.D. Wells, Narrow trans-TeV Higgs bosons and H -> h h decays: Two LHC search paths for a hidden sector Higgs boson. J. High Energy Phys. 03, 036 (2007). [arXiv:hep-ph/0701035]
52. N.D. Christensen, C. Duhr, FeynRules-Feynman rules made easy. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1614-1641 (2009). [arXiv:0806.4194]
53. See http://feynrules.phys.ucl.ac.be
54. C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics. Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008)
55. T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3. Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418-431 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0012260]
56. T. Hahn, M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one-loop calculations in four and D dimensions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153-165 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9807565]
57. J.A.M. Vermaseren, New features of FORM. arXiv:math-ph/0010025
58. D. Fliegner, A. Retey, J.A.M. Vermaseren, Parallelizing the symbolic manipulation program FORM. arXiv:hep-ph/9906426
59. D. Fliegner, A. Retey, J.A.M. Vermaseren, Parallelizing the symbolic manipulation program FORM. I: Workstation clusters and message passing. arXiv:hep-ph/0007221
60. M. Tentyukov et al., ParFORM: parallel version of the symbolic manipulation program FORM. arXiv:cs/0407066
61. M. Tentyukov, J.A.M. Vermaseren, The multithreaded version of FORM. Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1419-1427 (2010). [arXiv:hep-ph/0702279]
62. H. Murayama, I. Watanabe, K. Hagiwara, HELAS: HELicity amplitude subroutines for Feynman diagram evaluations. KEK-91-11
63. K. Hagiwara, J. Kanzaki, Q. Li, K. Mawatari, HELAS and Mad-Graph/MadEvent with spin-2 particles. Eur. Phys. J. C 56, 435-447 (2008). [arXiv:0805.2554]
64. J. Alwall et al., A les houches interface for BSM generators. arXiv:0712.3311
65. P. Meade, M. Reece, BRIDGE: Branching ratio inquiry/decay generated events. arXiv:hep-ph/0703031
66. F. Krauss, R. Kuhn, G. Soff, AMEGIC++ 1.0: A matrix element generator in C++. J. High Energy Phys. 02, 044 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0109036]
67. R. Kleiss, W.J. Stirling, Spinor techniques for calculating pp- → W±/Z0+jets. Nucl. Phys. B 262, 235-262 (1985)
68. K. Hagiwara, D. Zeppenfeld, Helicity amplitudes for heavy lepton production in e+e- annihilation. Nucl. Phys. B 274, 1 (1986)
69. R. Kleiss, R. Pittau, Weight optimization in multichannel Monte Carlo. Comput. Phys. Commun. 83, 141-146 (1994). [arXiv:hep-ph/9405257]
70. F.A. Berends, R. Pittau, R. Kleiss, All electroweak four-fermion processes in electron-positron collisions. Nucl. Phys. B 424, 308 (1994). [arXiv:hep-ph/9404313]
71. G.P. Lepage, VEGAS-an adaptive multi-dimensional integration program. CLNS-80/447
72. T. Ohl, Vegas revisited: Adaptive Monte Carlo integration beyond factorization. Comput. Phys. Commun. 120, 13-19 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9806432]
73. S. Schumann, F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation. J. High Energy Phys. 03, 038 (2008). [arXiv:0709.1027]
74. F. Krauss, A. Schälicke, G. Soff, APACIC++ 2.0: A PArton Cascade. In C++. Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 876-902 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0503087]
75. S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr, F. Siegert, Automating the POWHEG method in Sherpa. arXiv:1008.5399
76. S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr, F. Siegert, NLO matrix elements and truncated showers. arXiv:1009.1127
77. F. Krauss, A. Schalicke, S. Schumann, G. Soff, Simulating W/Z+jets production at the CERN LHC. Phys. Rev. D 72, 054017 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0503280]
78. T. Gleisberg, F. Krauss, A. Schälicke, S. Schumann, J.-C. Winter, Studying W+W- production at the Fermilab Tevatron with SHERPA. Phys. Rev. D 72, 034028 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0504032]
79. S. Höche, S. Schumann, F. Siegert, Hard photon production and matrix-element parton-shower merging. Phys. Rev. D 81, 034026 (2010). [arXiv:0912.3501]
80. T. Carli, T. Gehrmann, S. Höche, Hadronic final states in deepinelastic scattering with Sherpa. Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 73 (2010). [arXiv:0912.3715]
81. T. Sjöstrand, M. van Zijl, A multiple-interaction model for the event structure in hadron collisions. Phys. Rev. D 36, 2019 (1987)
82. S. Alekhin et al., HERA and the LHC-A workshop on the implications of HERA for LHC physics: Proceedings Part A. arXiv:hep-ph/0601012
83. J.-C. Winter, F. Krauss, G. Soff, A modified clusterhadronisation model. Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 381-395 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0311085]
84. F. Krauss, T. Laubrich, F. Siegert, Simulation of hadron decays in SHERPA, in preparation
85. M. Schonherr, F. Krauss, Soft photon radiation in particle decays in SHERPA. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 018 (2008). [arXiv:0810.5071]
86. S. Dawson, Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production. Nucl. Phys. B 359, 283-300 (1991)
87. T. Appelquist, C.W. Bernard, Strongly interacting Higgs bosons. Phys. Rev. D 22, 200 (1980)
88. T. Appelquist, G.-H.Wu, Electroweak chiral Lagrangian and new precision measurements. Phys. Rev. D 48, 3235-3241 (1993). [arXiv:hep-ph/9304240]
89. A. Dedes, T. Figy, S. Hoche, F. Krauss, T.E.J. Underwood, Searching for Nambu-Goldstone Bosons at the LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 11, 036 (2008). [arXiv:0807.4666]
90. O. Antunano, J.H. Kuhn, G. Rodrigo, Top quarks, axigluons and charge asymmetries at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D 77, 014003 (2008). [arXiv:0709.1652]
91. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.R. Dvali, The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. Phys. Lett. B 429, 263-272 (1998). [arXiv:hep-ph/9803315]
92. I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.R. Dvali, New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV. Phys. Lett. B 436, 257-263 (1998). [arXiv:hep-ph/ 9804398]
93. T. Gleisberg, F. Krauss, K.T. Matchev, A. Schälicke, S. Schumann, G. Soff, Helicity formalism for spin-2 particles. J. High Energy Phys. 09, 001 (2003). [arXiv:hep-ph/0306182]
94. A. Denner, H. Eck, O. Hahn, J. Kublbeck, Feynman rules for fermion number violating interactions. Nucl. Phys. B 387, 467-484 (1992)
95. K. Agashe, A. Belyaev, T. Krupovnickas, G. Perez, J. Virzi, LHC signals from warped extra dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 77, 015003 (2008). [arXiv:hep-ph/0612015]
96. C. Kilic, S. Schumann, M. Son, Searching for multijet resonances at the LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 04, 128 (2009). [arXiv:0810.5542]
97. P. Meade, M. Papucci, T. Volansky, Dark matter sees the light. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 052 (2009). [arXiv:0901.2925]
98. S. de Visscher, J.-M. Gerard, M. Herquet, V. Lemaitre, F. Maltoni, Unconventional phenomenology of a minimal two-Higgsdoublet model. J. High Energy Phys. 08, 042 (2009). [arXiv:0904.0705]
99. G.C. Branco, L. Lavoura, J.P. Silva, CP Violation (Clarendon, Oxford, 1999)
100. I.F. Ginzburg, M. Krawczyk, Symmetries of two Higgs doublet model and CP violation. Phys. Rev. D 72, 115013 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0408011]
101. S. Davidson, H.E. Haber, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model. Phys. Rev. D 72, 035004 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0504050]
102. H.E. Haber, D. O’Neil, Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model. II: The significance of tan(beta). Phys. Rev. D 74, 015018 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0602242]
103. J. Wess, B. Zumino, Supergauge transformations in fourdimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 70, 39-50 (1974)
104. H.P. Nilles, Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics. Phys. Rep. 110, 1-162 (1984)
105. H.E. Haber, G.L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: probing physics beyond the standard model. Phys. Rep. 117, 75-263 (1985)
106. S. Dawson, E. Eichten, C. Quigg, Search for supersymmetric particles in hadron-hadron collisions. Phys. Rev. D 31, 1581 (1985)
107. N.S. Craigie, K. Hidaka, P. Ratcliffe, The role helicity asymmetries could play in the search for supersymmetric interactions. Phys. Lett. B 129, 310 (1983)
108. N.S. Craigie, K. Hidaka, M. Jacob, F.M. Renard, Spin physics at short distances. Phys. Rep. 99, 69-236 (1983)
109. P. Chiappetta, J. Soffer, P. Taxil, Spin asymmetries for scalar leptons from w and z decay in p anti-p collisions. Phys. Lett. B 162, 192 (1985)
110. F. del Aguila, L. Ametller, On the detectability of sleptons at large hadron colliders. Phys. Lett. B 261, 326-333 (1991)
111. H. Baer, C.-H. Chen, F. Paige, X. Tata, Detecting sleptons at hadron colliders and supercolliders. Phys. Rev. D 49, 3283-3290 (1994). [arXiv:hep-ph/9311248]
112. T. Gehrmann, D. Maitre, D. Wyler, Spin asymmetries in squark and gluino production at polarized hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B 703, 147-176 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0406222]
113. G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, M. Klasen, Slepton production in polarized hadron collisions. Phys. Lett. B 609, 339-350 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0411318]
114. G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, M. Klasen, Non-diagonal and mixed squark production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D 72, 035016 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0507073]
115. G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, B. Herrmann, M. Klasen, Squark and gaugino hadroproduction and decays in non-minimal flavour violating supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B 787, 1-54 (2007). [arXiv:0704.1826]
116. B. Fuks, B. Herrmann, M. Klasen, Flavour violation in gaugemediated supersymmetry breaking models: experimental constraints and phenomenology at the LHC. Nucl. Phys. B 810, 266-299 (2009). [arXiv:0808.1104]
117. J. Debove, B. Fuks, M. Klasen, Model-independent analysis of gaugino-pair production in polarized and unpolarized hadron collisions. Phys. Rev. D 78, 074020 (2008). [arXiv:0804.0423]
118. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, P.M. Zerwas, Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B 492, 51-103 (1997). [arXiv:hep-ph/9610490]
119. W. Beenakker, M. Kramer, T. Plehn, M. Spira, P.M. Zerwas, Stop production at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B 515, 3-14 (1998). [arXiv:hep-ph/9710451]
120. H. Baer, B.W. Harris, M.H. Reno, Next-to-leading order slepton pair production at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. D 57, 5871-5874 (1998). [arXiv:hep-ph/9712315]
121. E.L. Berger, M. Klasen, T.M.P. Tait, Scale dependence of squark and gluino production cross sections. Phys. Rev. D 59, 074024 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9807230]
122. E.L. Berger, M. Klasen, T.M.P. Tait, Associated production of gauginos and gluinos at hadron colliders in next-toleading order SUSY-QCD. Phys. Lett. B 459, 165-170 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9902350]
123. E.L. Berger, M. Klasen, T.M.P. Tait, Next-to-leading order SUSY-QCD predictions for associated production of gauginos and gluinos. Phys. Rev. D 62, 095014 (2000). [arXiv:hep-ph/ 0005196]
124. W. Beenakker et al., The production of charginos/neutralinos and sleptons at hadron colliders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3780-3783 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9906298]
125. G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, M. Klasen, Transverse-momentum resummation for slepton-pair production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 74, 015001 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0603074]
126. G. Bozzi, B. Fuks, M. Klasen, Threshold resummation for slepton-pair production at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B 777, 157-181 (2007). [arXiv:hep-ph/0701202]
127. G. Bozzi, B. Fuks,M. Klasen, Joint resummation for slepton pair production at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B 794, 46-60 (2008). [arXiv:0709.3057]
128. A. Kulesza, L. Motyka, Threshold resummation for squarkantisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 111802 (2009). [arXiv:0807.2405]
129. A. Kulesza, L. Motyka, Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 80, 095004 (2009). [arXiv:0905.4749]
130. J. Debove, B. Fuks, M. Klasen, Transverse-momentum resummation for gaugino-pair production at hadron colliders. Phys. Lett. B 688, 208-211 (2010). [arXiv:0907.1105]
131. T. Hahn, C. Schappacher, The implementation of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in FeynArts and FormCalc. Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 54-68 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0105349]
132. T. Hahn, W. Hollik, J.I. Illana, S. Penaranda, Interplay between H -> b anti-s and b -> s gamma in the MSSM with non-minimal flavour violation. arXiv:hep-ph/0512315
133. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, A. Semenov, micrOMEGAs:Version 1.3. Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 577-604 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0405253]
134. G.C. Cho et al., Weak boson fusion production of supersymmetric particles at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 73, 054002 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0601063]
135. K. Hagiwara et al., Supersymmetry simulations with off-shell effects for LHC and ILC. Phys. Rev. D 73, 055005 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0512260]
136. S. Dimopoulos, D.W. Sutter, The supersymmetric flavor problem. Nucl. Phys. B 452, 496-512 (1995). [arXiv:hep-ph/9504415]
137. P. Skands et al., Susy les houches accord: Interfacing susy spectrum calculators, decay packages, and event generators. J. High Energy Phys. 07, 036 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0311123]
138. B. Allanach et al., SUSY Les Houches Accord 2. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 8-25 (2009). [arXiv:0801.0045]
139. C. Duhr, B. Fuks, in preparation
140. G. ‘t Hooft, Symmetry breaking through Bell-Jackiw anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8-11 (1976)
141. G.R. Farrar, P. Fayet, Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry. Phys. Lett. B 76, 575-579 (1978)
142. L. Girardello, M.T. Grisaru, Soft breaking of supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B 194, 65 (1982)
143. L.J. Hall, V.A. Kostelecky, S. Raby, New flavor violations in supergravity models. Nucl. Phys. B 267, 415 (1986)
144. S. Weinberg, Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking: an addendum. Phys. Rev. D 19, 1277-1280 (1979)
145. L. Susskind, Dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Weinberg-Salam theory. Phys. Rev. D 20, 2619-2625 (1979)
146. C. Csaki, C. Grojean, H. Murayama, L. Pilo, J. Terning, Gauge theories on an interval: unitarity without a Higgs. Phys. Rev. D 69, 055006 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0305237]
147. C. Csaki, C. Grojean, L. Pilo, J. Terning, Towards a realistic model of Higgsless electroweak symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 101802 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0308038]
148. J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231-252 (1998). [arXiv:hep-th/9711200]
149. R.S. Chivukula, D.A. Dicus, H.-J. He, Unitarity of compactified five dimensional Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Lett. B 525, 175-182 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0111016]
150. R.S. Chivukula, H.-J. He, Unitarity of deconstructed fivedimensional Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Lett. B 532, 121-128 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0201164]
151. R.S. Chivukula, D.A. Dicus, H.-J. He, S. Nandi, Unitarity of the higher dimensional standard model. Phys. Lett. B 562, 109-117 (2003). [arXiv:hep-ph/0302263]
152. H.-J. He et al., LHC signatures of new gauge bosons in minimal Higgsless model. Phys. Rev. D 78, 031701 (2008). [arXiv:0708.2588]
153. T. Ohl, C. Speckner, Production of almost fermiophobic gauge bosons in the minimal Higgsless model at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 78, 095008 (2008). [arXiv:0809.0023]
154. N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen, H. Georgi, (De)constructing dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4757-4761 (2001). [arXiv:hep-th/0104005]
155. C.T. Hill, S. Pokorski, J. Wang, Gauge invariant effective Lagrangian for Kaluza-Klein modes. Phys. Rev. D 64, 105005 (2001). [arXiv:hep-th/0104035]
156. R.S. Chivukula et al., A three site higgsless model. Phys. Rev. D 74, 075011 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0607124]
157. M.E. Peskin, T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections. Phys. Rev. D 46, 381-409 (1992)
158. G. Altarelli, R. Barbieri, Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes. Phys. Lett. B 253, 161-167 (1991)
159. G. Altarelli, R. Barbieri, S. Jadach, Toward a model independent analysis of electroweak data. Nucl. Phys. B 369, 3-32 (1992)
160. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2. Nucl. Phys. B 703, 127-146 (2004). [arXiv:hep-ph/0405040]
161. R.S. Chivukula, E.H. Simmons, H.-J. He, M. Kurachi, M. Tanabashi, Ideal fermion delocalization in Higgsless models. Phys. Rev. D 72, 015008 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0504114]
162. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csaki, C. Grojean, J. Terning, Curing the Ills of Higgsless models: The S parameter and unitarity. Phys. Rev. D 71, 035015 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0409126]
163. R. Foadi, S. Gopalakrishna, C. Schmidt, Effects of fermion localization in Higgsless theories and electroweak constraints. Phys. Lett. B 606, 157-163 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0409266]
164. T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng, B.A. Dobrescu, Bounds on universal extra dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 64, 035002 (2001). [arXiv:hep-ph/0012100]
165. L. Randall, R. Sundrum, A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370-3373 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9905221]
166. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G.R. Dvali, Phenomenology, astrophysics and cosmology of theories with sub-millimeter dimensions and TeV scale quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9807344]
167. H.-C. Cheng, K.T. Matchev, M. Schmaltz, Bosonic supersymmetry? Getting fooled at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 66, 056006 (2002)
168. G. Servant, T.M.P. Tait, Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate? Nucl. Phys. B 650, 391-419 (2003). [arXiv:hep-ph/0206071]
169. F. Burnell, G.D. Kribs, The abundance of Kaluza-Klein dark matter with coannihilation. Phys. Rev. D 73, 015001 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0509118]
170. K. Kong, K.T. Matchev, Precise calculation of the relic density of Kaluza-Klein dark matter in universal extra dimensions. J. High Energy Phys. 01, 038 (2006). [arXiv:hep-ph/0509119]
171. T. Han, J.D. Lykken, R.-J. Zhang, On Kaluza-Klein states from large extra dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 59, 105006 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9811350]
172. A. Datta, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev, Minimal universal extra dimensions in CalcHEP/CompHEP. Available at http://home.fnal. gov/kckong/mued/mued.ps
173. A. Perez-Lorenzana, An introduction to extra dimensions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 18, 224-269 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0503177]
174. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, The stronglyinteracting light Higgs. J. High Energy Phys. 06, 045 (2007). [arXiv:hep-ph/0703164]
175. E.Witten, Large N chiral dynamics. Ann. Phys. 128, 363 (1980)
176. J.A. Cronin, Phenomenological model of strong and weak interactions in chiral U(3) × U(3). Phys. Rev. 161, 1483-1494 (1967)
177. S.R. Coleman, J. Wess, B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1. Phys. Rev. 177, 2239-2247 (1969)
178. J. Callan, G. Curtis, S.R. Coleman, J.Wess, B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2. Phys. Rev. 177, 2247-2250 (1969)
179. J.M. Gerard, E. Kou, eta-eta’ masses and mixing: a large N(c) reappraisal. Phys. Lett. B 616, 85-92 (2005). [arXiv:hep-ph/0411292]
180. H. Leutwyler, Bounds on the light quark masses. Phys. Lett. B 374, 163-168 (1996). [arXiv:hep-ph/9601234]
181. P. Herrera-Siklody, J.I. Latorre, P. Pascual, J. Taron, eta eta’ mixing from U(3)L × U(3)R chiral perturbation theory. Phys. Lett. B 419, 326-332 (1998). [arXiv:hep-ph/9710268]
182. J. Rosiek, Complete set of Feynman rules for the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model. Phys. Rev. D 41, 3464 (1990)
183. J. Rosiek, Complete set of Feynman rules for the MSSM-ERRATUM. arXiv:hep-ph/9511250
184. J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models. 1. Nucl. Phys. B 272, 1 (1986)
185. B.C. Allanach et al., The Snowmass points and slopes: benchmarks for SUSY searches. Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 113-123 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0202233]
186. G.F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi, J.D. Wells, Quantum gravity and extra dimensions at high-energy colliders. Nucl. Phys. B 544, 3-38 (1999). [arXiv:hep-ph/9811291]
187. T.G. Rizzo, Probes of universal extra dimensions at colliders. Phys. Rev. D 64, 095010 (2001)
188. C. Degrande, J.M. Gerard, A theoretical determination of the eta-eta’ mixing. J. High Energy Phys. 05, 043 (2009). [arXiv:0901.2860]
189. K. Hagiwara, R. Szalapski, D. Zeppenfeld, Anomalous Higgs boson production and decay. Phys. Lett. B 318, 155-162 (1993). [arXiv:hep-ph/9308347]
190. J. Alwall et al., A standard format for Les Houches event files. Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 300-304 (2007). [arXiv:hep-ph/0609017]
191. B.C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: A C++ program for calculating supersymmetric spectra. Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 305-331 (2002). [arXiv:hep-ph/0104145]
192. H.-C. Cheng, K.T. Matchev, M. Schmaltz, Radiative corrections to Kaluza-Klein masses. Phys. Rev. D 66, 036005 (2002)
193. M. ElKacimi, D. Goujdami, H. Przysiezniak, P. Skands, One universal extra dimension in Pythia. Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 122-127 (2010). [arXiv:0901.4087]