Guidelines for Mechanical Integrity Systems

Guidelines for Mechanical Integrity Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-283

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970990766     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470048085     Document Type: Book

References (48)

1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, 29 CFR Part 1910, Section 119, Washington, DC, 1992.
2. Environmental Protection Agency, Accidental Release Prevention Requirements:Risk Management Programs, Clean Air Act, Section 112 (r)(7), Washington, DC, 1996.
3. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Guidelines for Engineering Design for Process Safety, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, NY, 1993.
4. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Guidelines for Implementing Process Safety Management Systems, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, NY, 1994.
5. American Chemistry Council, Resource Guide for the Process Safety Code of Management Practices, Washington, DC, 1990.
6. Decker, L. and R. Montgomery, Dejning and Maintaining a RAGAGEP Program, presented at Process Plant Safety Symposium, Houston, TX, December 1998.
7. Chlorine Institute, Atmospheric Monitoring Equipment for Chlorine, Pamphlet 73, Arlington, VA, 2003.
8. National Fire Protection Association, Standard for the Installation of Oil-burning Equipment, NFPA 3 1, Quincy, MA, 2001.
9. National Fire Protection Association, National Fuel Gas Code, NFPA 54, Quincy, MA, 2002.
10. National Fire Protection Association, Boiler and Combustion Systems Hazard Code, NFPA 85, Quincy, MA, 2004.
11. National Fire Protection Association, Ovens and Furnaces, NFPA 86, Quincy, MA, 2003.
12. National Fire Protection Association, Standard for Industrial Furnaces Using a Special Processing Atmosphere, NFPA 86C, Quincy, MA, 1999.
13. National Fire Protection Association, Standard for Industrial Furnaces Using Vacuum as an Atmosphere, NFPA 86D, Quincy, MA, 1999.
14. National Fire Protection Association, Standard for Stoker Operation, NFPA 8505, Quincy, MA, 1998.
15. ABSG Consulting Inc., Mechanical Integrity, Course I l l, Process Safety Institute, Houston, TX, 2004.
16. Kletz, T., What Went Wrong: Case Histories of Process Plant Disasters, 4th Edition, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Burlington, MA, 1999.
17. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, 29 CFR Part 1910, Section 119, Washington, DC, 1992.
18. American Petroleum Institute, Pressure Vessel Inspection Code: Maintenance Inspection, Rating, Repair and Alteration, API 5 10, Washington, DC, 2003.
19. American Petroleum Institute, Piping Inspection Code: Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Re-rating of In-service Piping, API 570, Washington, DC, 2003.
20. Montgomery, R. and W. Satterfield, Applications of Risk-based Decision-making Tools for Process Equipment Maintenance, presented at ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, Cleveland, OH, 2002.
21. Trinker, D., A Survey of Risk Tolerance Criteria for Acute Process Related Industrial Hazards, ABSG Consulting Inc., Knoxville, TN, 2000.
22. ABSG Consulting Inc., Advanced Process Hazard Analysis Leader Techniques, Course 104, Process Safety Institute, Houston, TX, 2004.
23. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Second Edition with Worked Examples, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, NY, 1992.
24. SAE International, Evaluation Criteria for Reliability-Centered Maintenance Processes, SAE Standard JAlOl I, Washington, DC, 1999.
25. Folk, T., Risk Based Approach to Mechanical Integrity Success in Implementation, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Spring National Meeting Process Plant Safety Symposium, New Orleans, LA, 2003.
26. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Layer of Protection Analysis, Simplified Process Risk Assessment, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, NY, 2001.
27. ABSG Consulting Inc., Layer of Protection Analysis, Course 209, Process Safety Institute, Houston, TX, 2004.
28. The International Society for Measurement and Control, Functional Safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Secto - Part I : Framework, Definitions, System, Hardware and Sofiare Requirements, ANSI/ISA-84.00.01-2004 Part 1 (IEC 6151 1-1 Mod), Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.
29. American Petroleum Institute, Risk-Based Inspection, API RP 580, Washington, DC, 2002.
30. American Petroleum Institute, Base Resource Document - Risk-based Inspection, API Pub1 581, Washington, DC, 2000.
31. Moubray, J., Reliability Centered Maintenance: RCMII, Industrial Press Inc., New York, NY, 1997.
32. Smith, A,, Reliability Centered Maintenance, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, NY, 1993.
33. International Maritime Organization, Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule Making Process, MSC/Circ. 1023-MEPC/Circ. 392, London, England, 2002.
34. The The International Society for Measurement and Control, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF) - Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Evaluation Techniques, Part 1: Introduction, ISATR84.00.02-2002, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002.
35. International Society for Measurement and Control, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF) - Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Evaluation Techniques, Part 2: Determining the SIL of a SIF via SimpliJied Equations, ISA-TR84.00.02-2002, Research Triangle Park, NC. 2002.
36. The International Society for Measurement and Control, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF) - Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Evaluation Techniques, Part 3: Determining the SIL of a SIF via Fault Tree Analysis, ISA-TR84.00.02-2002, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002.
37. The International Society for Measurement and Control, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF) - Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Evaluation Techniques, Part 4: Determining the SIL of a SIF via Markov Analysis, ISA-TR84.00.02-2002, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002.
38. The International Society for Measurement and Control, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF) - Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Evaluation Techniques, Part 5: Determining the PFD of Logic Solvers via Markov Analysis, 1SA-TR84.00.02-2002, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002.
39. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, 29 CFR Part 1910, Section 119, Washington, DC, 1992.
40. ABSG Consulting Inc., Reliability Management, Course 119, Process Safety Institute, Houston, TX, 2004.
41. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Guidelines for Auditing Process Safety Management Systems, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, NY, 1993.
42. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Guidelines for Implementing Process Safety Management Systems, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, NY, 1994.
43. Jones, R., Risk-based Management, A Reliability-centered Approach, Gulf Coast Publishing, Houston, TX, 1995.
44. ABSG Consulting Inc., Enhancing Process Safety Performance, Course 134, Process Safety Institute, Houston, TX, 2004.
45. Wulpi, D., Understanding How Components Fail, 2nd Edition, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1999.
46. ABS Group, Inc., Root Cause Analysis Handbook, A Guide to Effective Incident Investigation, Risk & Reliability Division, 1999.
47. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Guidelines for Investigating Chemical Process Incidents, 2nd Edition, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, NY. 2003.
48. Peny, Robert G. and J. Steven Arendt, rf You Can 't Measure It, You Can 't Control It; ProSmart Process Safety Management, AIChE CCPS International Conference and Workshop, Toronto, Ontario, 2001.