The triple bottom line and impact assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other?

Tools, Techniques and Approaches for Sustainability: Collected Writings in Environmental Assessment Policy and Management

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 101-124

  Vanclay, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Environmental management systems; Social impact assessment; Social indicators; Strategic environmental assessment; Sustainability; TBL reporting; Triple bottom line

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970978433     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789814289696_0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Australia (1999). Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (No 91, 1999).
2. Australia (2000). Gene Technology Act 2000 (No 169,2000).
3. Australia (2000). Gene Technology Bill 2000 Explanatory Memorandum.
4. Barrow, C (2000). Social Impact Assessment. London: Arnold.
5. Becker, H (1997). Social Impact Assessment. London: UCL Press.
6. Becker, Hand F (eds.) (2003). The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7. Birley, M (1995). Health impact assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanc1ay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 153-170. Chichester: Wiley.
8. Boothroyd, P (1995). Policy assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanc1ay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 83-126. Chichester: Wiley.
9. BP Australia (2001). Triple Bottom Line Report. Melbourne: BP Australia.
10. Branch, K et al. (1984). Guide to Social Assessment: A Framework for Assessing Social Change. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
11. Branch, K and H Ross (1997). The evolution of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual models and scope. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, New Orleans.
12. Buckley, R (1995). Environmental auditing. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanc1ay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 283-301. Chichester: Wiley.
13. Burdge, R (1998). A Conceptual Approach to Social Impact Assessment (rev edn). Middleton: Social Ecology Press.
14. Burdge, R (1999). A Community Guide to Social Impact Assessment (rev edn). Middleton: Social Ecology Press.
15. Burdge, RJ and F Vanc1ay (1995). Social impact assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanc1ay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 31-66. Chichester: Wiley.
16. Campbell, A (2004). Landscapes, lifestyles and livelihoods. Paper presented to the National Extension Policy Forum, Sydney, 21 July 2004.
17. Carpenter, R (1995). Risk assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanc1ay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 193-219. Chichester: Wiley.
18. Dale, A, P Chapman and M McDonald (1997). Social impact assessment in Queensland: Why practice lags behind legislative opportunity. Impact Assessment, 15(2), 159-179.
19. Donnelly, A, B Dalal-Clayton and R Hughes (eds.) (1998). A Directory of Impact Assessment Guidelines, 2nd edn. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
20. Elkington, J (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.
21. Environmental Management Systems Working Group (2001). Towards a National Framework for the Development of Environmental Management Systems in Agriculture: A Public Discussion Paper Prepared by the Environmental Management Systems Working Group. Canberra: Natural Resource Management Standing Committee Discussion Paper.
22. Freudenburg, Wand K Keating (1982). Increasing the impact of sociology on social impact assessment. The American Sociologist, 17, 71-80.
23. Goodland, Rand H Daly (1995). Environmental sustainability. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanc1ay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 303-322. Chichester: Wiley.
24. Google Search Engine (2003). (on-line resource) http://www.google.com. [accessed 19 May 2003].
25. Harvey, N (1998). Environmental Impact Assessment: Procedures, Practice and Prospects in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
26. Hawkes, J (2001). The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture's Essential Role in Public Planning. Melbourne: Cultural Development Network.
27. olliday, CO, S Schmidheiny and P Watts (2002). Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
28. IAIA (2003). International Association for Impact Assessment home page 2003. http://www.iaia.org [accessed 3 April 2003].
29. [US] Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment (1994). Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment, 12(2), 107-152.
30. Lane, M, A Dale and N Taylor (eds.) (2001). Social Assessment in Natural Resource Management Institutions. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
31. Leistritz, FL (1995). Economic and fiscal impact assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanclay and D. Bronstein (eds.), pp. 129-139. Chichester: Wiley.
32. Ortolano, L and A Shepherd (1995). Environmental impact assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanclay and D. Bronstein (eds.), pp. 3-30. Chichester: Wiley.
33. Partidirio, M (1996). Strategic environmental assessment: Key issues emerging from recent practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(1),31-55.
34. Partidirio, M (1999). Strategic environmental assessment: Principles and potential. In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, J Petts (ed.), pp. 12-32. London: Blackwell Science.
35. Partidirio, M (2000). Elements of an SEA framework: Improving the added-value of SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(6), 647-663.
36. Partidirio, M and R Clark (eds.) (2000). Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Boca Raton, FI: CRC-Lewis.
37. Porter, A (1995). Technology assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanclay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 67-81. Chichester: Wiley.
38. Rattle, Rand R Kwiatkowski (2003). Integrating Health and Social Impact Assessment. In International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment, H Becker and F Vanclay (eds.), pp. 92-107. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
39. Sarre, Rand G Treuren (2001). The triple bottom line: Balancing social, environmental and financial outcomes in business (paper prepared for the South Australian Business Vision 2010) (on-line resource) http://business.unisa.edu.au/cae/tblltbldownloadables/sabv201Ofin.rtf [accessed 3 April 2003].
40. Scrase, JI and WR Sheate (2002). Integration and integrated approaches to assessment: What do they mean for the environment. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 4,275-294.
41. Slootweg, R, F VancJay and M van Schooten (2001). Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(1), 19-28.
42. Stolp, A (2003). Citizen values assessment. In International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment, H Becker and F Vanclay (eds.), pp. 231-257. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
43. STAKES (2000). Human Impact Assessment Ideacard 4/00. Helsinki: National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health.
44. STAKES (2002). Human impact assessment (on-line resource) http://www.stakes.ti/svalhuia/[accessed 3 April 2003].
45. SustainAbility (2003). The triple bottom line (on-line resource) http://www.sustainability.corn/philosophy/triple-bottorn/tbl-intro.asp [accessed 3 April 2003].
46. Taylor, CN, CH Bryan and CG Goodrich (1995). Social Assessment: Theory, Process and Techniques, 2nd edn. Christchurch: Taylor Baines and Associates.
47. Therivel, Rand M Partidano (eds.) (1996). The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan.
48. Vanclay, F (1998). Inclusion of social data in the National Land and Water Resources Audit. Rural Society, 8(1), 39-48.
49. Vanclay, F (1999). Social Impact Assessment, In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vol 1, J Petts (ed.), pp. 301-326. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
50. Vanclay, F (2002a). Social impact assessment. In Responding to Global Environmental Change, M Tolba (ed.), pp. 387-393. Chichester: Wiley.
51. Vanclay, F (2002b). Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), 183-211.
52. Vanclay, F (2003a). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5-11.
53. Vanclay, F (2003b). Conceptual and methodological advances in social impact assessment. In International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment, H Becker and F Vanclay (eds.), pp. 1-10. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
54. Vanclay, F and D Bronstein (1995). Editors' Preface: The state ofthe art ofImpact Assessment. In Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F Vanclay and D Bronstein (eds.), pp. 11-13. Chichester: Wiley.
55. Vanclay, F and M Nauta (2003). Social Impact Assessment Bibliography (on-line resource) http://www.iaia.org/Non_Members/SIA % 20Database/SIA_interface.asp [accessed 13 July 2004].
56. Vandenberg, M (2002). TBL Victoria Scoping Study: How Victorian Businesses, Governments and Non-government Organisations are Taking the Journey towards the Triple Bottom Line. Report for the Victorian State Government, Department of Premier and Cabinet, Melbourne: Encompass. (on-line resource) http://www.ethyka.com/tbllresourcesITBL%20Scoping%20Study.pdf [accessed 3 April 2003].
57. van der Vorst, R, A Grafe-Buckens and WR Sheate (1999). A systemic framework for environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 1(1), 1-26.
58. Verheem, Rand J Tonk (2000). Strategic environmental assessment: One concept, mUltiple forms. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3), 177-182.
59. Wood, C and M Dejeddour (1992). Strategic environmental assessment: EA of policies, plans and programmes. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 10(1),3-23.
60. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future (Australian edition). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
61. World Health Organization (1946). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948. http://www.who.int/about/definition/enJ[accessed 3 April 2003].
62. World Health Organization (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion (on-line resource) http://www.who.int/hpr/archive/docs/ottawa.html [accessed 3 April 2003].