The burden of stroke in the Netherlands: Estimating quality of life and costs for 1 year poststroke

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2015, Pages

  Van Eeden, M ^a   Van Heugten, C ^a   Van Mastrigt, G A P G ^a   Van Mierlo, M ^b   Visser Meily, J M A ^b   Evers, S M A A ^a,c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COST OF ILLNESS; FEMALE; GERIATRIC REHABILITATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NURSING HOME; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CENTER; SEX DIFFERENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECONOMICS; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; SELF REPORT;

AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SELF REPORT; STROKE;

EID: 84970922508     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008220     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kompas N. Prevalence and incidence of stroke. 2011. http://www.nationaalkompas.nl/gezondheid-en-ziekte/ziekten-en-aandoeningen/hartvaatstelsel/beroerte/omvang/.
2. Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, Gonzalez JL, et al. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: Experience of a stroke unit. Stroke 2000;31:2995-3000.
3. Hommel M, Trabucco-Miguel S, Joray S, et al. Social dysfunctioning after mild to moderate first-ever stroke at vocational age. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:371-5.
4. Ostwald SK, Godwin KM, Cron SG. Predictors of life satisfaction in stroke survivors and spousal caregivers after inpatient rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs 2009;34:160-7, 174; discussion 174.
5. Bergersen H, Frøslie KF, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K, et al. Anxiety, depression, and psychological well-being 2 to 5 years poststroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;19:364-9.
6. Tengs TO, Lin TH. A meta-analysis of quality-of-life estimates for stroke. Pharmacoeconomics 2003;21:191-200.
7. Lindgren P, Glader EL, Jönsson B. Utility loss and indirect costs after stroke in Sweden. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008;15:230-3.
8. Haacke C, Althaus A, Spottke A, et al. Long-term outcome after stroke: Evaluating health-related quality of life using utility measurements. Stroke 2006;37:193-8.
9. Bushnell CD, Reeves MJ, Zhao X, et al. Sex differences in quality of life after ischemic stroke. Neurology 2014;82:922-31.
10. Dewey HM, Thrift AG, Mihalopoulos C, et al. Cost of stroke in Australia from a societal perspective: Results from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2001;32:2409-16.
11. Fattore G, Torbica A, Susi A, et al. The social and economic burden of stroke survivors in Italy: A prospective, incidence-based, multi-centre cost of illness study. BMC Neurol 2012;12:137.
12. Saka O, McGuire A, Wolfe C. Cost of stroke in the United Kingdom. Age Ageing 2009;38:27-32.
13. Persson J, Ferraz-Nunes J, Karlberg I. Economic burden of stroke in a large county in Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:341.
14. Evers SM, Engel GL, Ament AJ. Cost of stroke in the Netherlands from a societal perspective. Stroke 1997;28:1375-81.
15. Poos MJJC, et al. (2008). Cost of Illness in the Netherlands 2005, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Mileu.
16. Heijnen R, Limburg M, Evers S, et al. Towards a better integrated stroke care: The development of integrated stroke care in the southern part of the Netherlands during the last 15 years (special 10th anniversary edition paper). Int J Integr Care 2012;12: E123.
17. van Eeden M, van Heugten CM, Evers SM. The economic impact of stroke in the Netherlands: The euro-restore4stroke study. BMC Public Health 2012;12:122.
18. van Mierlo ML, van Heugten CM, Post MWM, et al. A longitudinal cohort study on quality of life in stroke patients and their partners: Restore4stroke cohort. Int J Stroke 2014;9:148-54.
19. Ritter P, Lorig K, Laurent D, et al. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: A randomized comparison. J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e29.
20. Schram MT, Sep SJ, van der Kallen CJ, et al. The Maastricht study: An extensive phenotyping study on determinants of type 2 diabetes, its complications and its comorbidities. Eur J Epidemiol 2014;29:439-51.
21. Hunger M, Sabariego C, Stollenwerk B, et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in German stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res 2012;21:1205-16.
22. Lamers LM, Stalmeier PF, McDonnell J, et al. [Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: The Dutch EQ-5D tariff ]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005;149:1574-8.
23. Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek. Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Diemen, College voor zorgverzekeringen, 2010.
24. Pickard AS, Neary M, Cella D. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:70.
25. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
26. Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. J Diagn Med Sonogr 1990;6:35-9.
27. Neumann PJ. Costing and perspective in published cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Care 2009;47:S28-S32.
28. Tan SS, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM, et al. Comparing methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital services. Eur J Health Econ 2009;10:39-45.
29. Wordsworth S, Ludbrook A. Comparing costing results in across country economic evaluations: The use of technology specific purchasing power parities. Health Econ 2005;14:93-9.
30. Coughlin SS. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:87-91.
31. van den Brink M, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Cost measurement in economic evaluations of health care: Whom to ask? Med Care 2004;42:740-6.