Special Relativism — The Natural Attitude

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 139-143

  Collins, H M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970777751     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: 14603659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030631282012001009     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 12 (1982), 131-32.
2. It has been disposed of through the ‘rationality debate’: See, for example, B. Wilson (ed.), Rationality (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1970). The complexities of imputing logical contradictions are also nicely brought out in the debate about cognitive dissonance: See, for example, Roger Brown, Social Psychology (London: Macmillan, 1965), 590ff. For discussion related specifically to the sociology of science, see H.M. Collins and G. Cox, ‘Recovering Relativity: Did Prophecy Fail?’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 6 (1976), 423-44.
3. Collins and Cox, Rationality (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1970) note 2;
4. H.M. Collins, ‘What is TRASP? The Radical Programme as a Methodological Imperative’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 11 (1981), 215-24.
5. Alfred Schutz, Collected Papers, Vol. 1, The Problem of Social Reality (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973), 104ff.
6. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 12 (1982), 133-36.
7. H.M. Collins (ed.), Knowledge and Controversy: Studies of Modern Natural Science, Special Issue of Social Studies of Science, Vol. 11, No. 1 (February 1981), 3-158.
8. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 12 (1982), 136-39.