I. Liberalism and the Art of Separation

Political Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1984, Pages 315-330

  Walzer, Michael ^a  

^a Institute for Advanced Study   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970773446     PISSN: 00905917     EISSN: 15527476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0090591784012003001     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J. E. Neale, Queen Elizabeth (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1934) p. 174.
2. Marx, Early Writings, trans. T. B. Bottomore (London: C. A. Watts, 1963), p. 26.
3. Robert Michels, Political Parties, trans. Eden and Cedar Paul (New York: Dover, 1959).
4. Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983).
5. The best recent account of the transformation of market power into political power is Charles E. Lindblom, Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books, 1977), esp. Part V.
6. Marx, 1963, p.24.
7. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970), p. x.
8. Coriolanus, Act V, scene iii.
9. Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. Patrick Romanell (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1950), p. 27.
10. For a strong statement of the role of courts in defense of rights, see Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977).
11. See especially Foucault's Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage, 1979). The argument works best for institutions like prisons, hospitals, and asylums, where the subjects of discipline are civically, physically, or mentally incapacitated, but Foucault means it to apply also to schools and factories: pp. 293ff.