Latent Structure Models with Direct Effects between Indicators: Local Dependence Models

Sociological Methods & Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1988, Pages 379-405

  Hagenaars, Jacques A ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970693832     PISSN: 00491241     EISSN: 15528294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0049124188016003002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BISHOP, Y.M.M., S. E. FIENBERG, and P. W. HOLLAND (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
2. BRADBURN, N. M. (1983) “Response effects,” pp. 289-328 in P. Rossi et al. (eds.) Handbook of Survey Research. New York: Academic Press.
3. CLOGG, C. C. (1981) “New developments in latent structure analysis,” pp. 215-246 in D. J. Jackson and E. F. Borgatta (eds.) Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. CLOGG, C. C. and L. A. GOODMAN (1984) “Latent structure analysis of a set of multidimensional contingency tables.” J. of the Amer. Stat. Assn. 79: 762-771.
5. CLOGG, C. C. and L. A. GOODMAN (1985) “Simultaneous latent structure analysis in several groups,” pp. 81-110 in N. B. Tuma (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1985. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. COLEMAN, J. S. (1964) Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. London: Free Press.
7. DAYTON, C. M. and G. B. MACREADY (1976) “A probabilistic model for the validation of behavioral hierarchies.” Psychometrika 41: 189-204.
8. DEMPSTER, A. P., N. M. LAIRD, and D. B. RUBIN (1977) “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM-algorithm.” J. of the Royal Stat. Society Series B 39: 1-38.
9. DUNCAN, O. D., D. M. SLOANE, and C. BRODY (1982) “Latent classes inferred from response-consistency effects,” pp. 19-64 in K. G. Jöreskog and H. Wold (eds.) Systems under Indirect Observation. Part I. Amsterdam: North Holland.
10. EVERITT, B. S. (1984) “A note on parameter estimation for Lazarsfeld's latent class model using the EM-algorithm.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 19: 79-89.
11. FIENBERG, S. E. (1980) The Analysis of Cross-classified Categorical Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. GOODMAN, L. A. (1973) “The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables when some of the variables are posterior to others; a modified path analysis approach.” Biometrika 60: 179-192.
13. GOODMAN, L. A. (1974a) “The analysis of systems of qualitative variables when some of the variables are unobservable. Part I—a modified latent structure approach.” Amer. J. of Sociology 79: 1179-1259.
14. GOODMAN, L. A. (1974b) “Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models.” Biometrika 61: 215-231.
15. GOODMAN, L. A. (1978) Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Variables; Loglinear Models and Latent Structure Analysis. Cambridge: Abt.
16. HABERMAN, S. J. (1974) “Log-linear models for frequency tables derived by indirect observation.” Annals of Statistics 2: 911-924.
17. HABERMAN, S. J. (1977) “Product models for frequency tables involving indirect observations.” Annals of statistics 5: 1124-1147.
18. HABERMAN, S. J. (1979) Analysis of Qualitative Data, Vol. 2. New Developments. New York: Academic Press.
19. HAGENAARS, J. A. (1978) “Latent probability models with direct effects between indicators.” Quality and Quantity 12: 205-221.
20. HAGENAARS, J. A. (1985) “Loglineaire analyse van herhaalde surveys; panel-, trend-en cohortonderzoek.” (Log-linear analysis of repeated surveys; panel, trend, and cohort research). Dissertation, Tilburg University.
21. HAGENAARS, J. A. (1986) “Symmetry, quasi-symmetry and marginal homogeneity on the latent level.” Social Sci. Research 15: 241-255.
22. HAGENAARS, J. A. (1987) “LCAG—loglinear modelling with latent variables: A modified LISREL approach,” in W. Saris and I. Gallhofer (eds.) Sociometric Research, Vol. 2, London: Macmillan.
23. HAGENAARS, J. A., A. G. HEINEN, and P. A. HAMERS (1980) “Causale modellen met diskrete latente variabelen: Een variant op de LISREL-benadering.” (Causal models with discrete latent variables: A modified LISREL approach) Methoden en Data Nieuwsbrief 5: 38-54.
24. HAGENAARS, J. A. and LUIJKX (1987) LCAG; Latent class models and other loglinear models with latent variables. User's Manual. Working Papers Series, Tilburg University, Department of Sociology.
25. HAGENAARS, J. A. and M. A. VAN DER WALLE (1983) “LCAG—een computer programma voor de analyse van loglineaire modellen met latente variabelen.” (LCAG—a computer program for analyzing log-linear models with latent variables). Tilburg University, Department of Sociology.
26. HARPER, D. (1972) “Local dependence latent structure models.” Psychometrika 37: 53-59.
27. JÖRESKOG, K. G. and D. SÖRBOM (1984) LISREL VI, User's Guide. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
28. KIIVERI, H. and T. P. SPEED (1982) “Structural analysis of multivariate data; a review,” pp. 209-289 in S. Leinhardt (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1982. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. LAZARSFELD, P. F. and N. W. HENRY (1968) Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30. SCHWARTZ, J. E. (1985) “The neglected problem of measurement error in categorical data.” Soc. Methods & Research 13: 435-466.