Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 101-110

  Gresham, Frank M ^a   Gresham, Gwenyth N ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Heartland Area Education Agency   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970634625     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: 15384764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246698201600110     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ayllon, T., & Roberts, M.D. Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 71-76.
2. Axelrod, S. Comparison of individual and group contingencies in two special classes. Behavior Therapy, 1973, 4, 83-90.
3. Barlow, D.H., & Hayes, S.C. Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979, 12, 199-210.
4. Barrish, H.H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M.M. Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 119-124.
5. Blackham, G.J., & Silberman, A. Modification of child and adolescent behavior (3rd ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1980.
6. Bronfenbrenner, U. Two worlds of childhood: U. S. and U. S. S. R. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1970.
7. Drabman, R.S. Child-versus-teacher-administered programs in a psychiatric hospital school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1973, 1, 68-87.
8. Drabman, R.S., Spitnalnik, R., & Spitnalnik, K. Sociometric and disruptive behavior as a function of four types of token reinforcement programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 93-101.
9. Favell, J. The power of positive reinforcement. Springfield, III.: Charles C Thomas, 1977.
10. Grandy, G.S., Madsen, C.H., & DeMesserman, L.M. The effects of individual and interdependent contingencies on inappropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 1973, 10, 488-493.
11. Gresham, F.M. Assessment of children's social skills. Journal of School Psychology, 1981, 19, 120-133.
12. Hayes, L.A. The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 628-648.
13. Herman, S.H., & Tramontana, J. Instructions and group versus individual reinforcement in modifying disruptive group behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971, 4, 113-119.
14. Hersen, M., & Barlow, D.H. Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press, 1976.
15. Kazdin, A.E. Behavior modification in applied settings (2nd ed.). Homewood, III.: The Dorsey Press, 1980.
16. Kent, R.N., & Foster, S.L. Direct observational procedures: Methodological issues in naturalistic settings. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (ed.). Single subject research: Stragegies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
17. Kent, R.N., & Foster, S.L. Direct observational procedures: Methodological issues in naturalistic settings. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley, 1977.
18. Kratochwill, T.R. (ed.). Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
19. Levin, L. A comparison of individual and group contingencies with third and fourth grade children. Probe, 1971, 1, 12-13.
20. Litow, L., & Pumroy, D.K. A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975, 8, 341-347.
21. O'Leary, K.D., & Becker, W.C. Behavior modification of an adjustment class: A token reinforcement program. Exceptional Children, 1967, 33, 637-642.
22. O'Leary, S.G., & O'Leary, K.D. Behavior modification in the school. In H. Leitenberg (ed.), Handbook of behavior modification and behavior therapy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976, 475-515.
23. Page, D.P., & Edwards, R.P. Behavior change strategies for reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 1978, 15, 413-418.
24. Walker, H.M., & Buckley, N.K. Programming generalization and maintenance of treatment effects across time and across settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 209-224.
25. Prentice, B.S. The effectiveness of group versus individual reinforcement in shaping attentive classroom behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1970.
26. Turkett, R.L. A study of the differential effects of individual versus group reward conditions on the creative productions of elementary school children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1971.