‘Naive’ native speakers and judgements of oral proficiency in Spanish

Language Testing

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1989, Pages 152-163

  Barnwell, David ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970466112     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026553228900600203     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages 1982/1986: Proficiency guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, New York.
2. Arendt, J., Lange, D. and Wakefield, R. 1986: Strengthening the language requirement at the University of Minnesota: An initial report. Foreign Language Annals 19, 149-56.
3. Bachman, L. 1988: Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, 149-63.
4. Bachman, L. and Savignon, S. 1986: The evaluation of communicative language proficiency; a critique of the ACTFL oral interview. Modern Language Journal 70, 380-90.
5. Barnwell, D. 1987: Who is to judge how well others speak?: An experiment with the ACTFL/ETS scale. In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Ohio State University 37-45.
6. Bart, F. 1986: A note on proficiency and communication in language teaching. ADFL Bulletin 17, 61-62.
7. Bragger, J. 1986: Teaching for proficiency: Are we ready? ADFL Bulletin 18, 11-14.
8. Buck, K. and Hiple, D. 1984: The rationale for defining and measuring foreign language proficiency programs for business. Foreign Language Annals 17, 525-28.
9. Byrnes, H. 1986: Proficiency: Concepts and developments. ADFL Bulletin 18, 9-10.
10. Clark, L.D. and Clifford, R. 1987: The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques: Development, current status, and needed research. In Valdman, A., editor, 1987: 1-18.
11. Cummins, P. 1987: School-college articulation and proficiency standards: A status report. ADFL Bulletin 19, 8-15.
12. Engber, C. 1987: Summary of the discussion session. In Valdman, A., editor, 1987: 55-58.
13. Freed, B. 1987: Preliminary impressions of the effects of proficiency-based language requirements. Foreign Language Annals 20, 139-46.
14. Frith, J.R. 1979: Testing the FSI testing kit. ADFL Bulletin 11, 12-14.
15. Galloway, V. 1980: Perceptions of the communicative efforts of American students of Spanish. Modern Language Journal 64, 428-33.
16. Gannon, R.E. 1980: Appropriateness and the foreign language learner. English Language Teaching Journal 34, 90-93.
17. Gaudiani, C. 1987: Dissemination and diffusion of progress in the foreign language teaching field: A national plan. In Lambert, 163-176.
18. Henning, G. 1983: Oral proficiency testing: Comparative validities of interview, imitation, and completion models. Language Learning 33, 315-32.
19. Higgs, T., editor 1984. Teaching for proficiency: The organizing principle. Lincolnwood: National Textbook Company.
20. Hiple, D. and Manley, J. 1987: Testing how well foreign language teachers speak: A state mandate. Foreign Language Annals 20, 147-53.
21. Hummel, R.D. 1985: Evaluating proficiency in comprehension skills: How can we measure what we can't observe? ADFL Bulletin 16, 13-16.
22. Kramsch, C. 1986: Proficiency versus achievement: Reflections on the proficiency movement. ADFL Bulletin 18, 22-24.
23. Lambert, R. editor 1987: Foreign language instruction: A national agenda. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
24. Lantolf, J.P. and Frawley, W. 1985: Oral proficiency testing; a critical analysis. Modern Language Journal 69, 337-45.
25. Lantolf, J.P. and Frawley, W. 1988: Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10, 181-95.
26. Liskin-Gasparro, J. 1984a: The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines: A historical perspective. In Higgis, T., editor, 1984; 11-42.
27. Liskin-Gasparro, J. 1984b: The ACTFL proficiency guidelines: Gateway to testing and curriculum. Foreign Language Annals 17, 475-89.
28. Loveday, L. 1982: The sociolinguistics of learning and using a non-native language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
29. Ludwig, J. 1984: Native speaker judgments of second language learners’ efforts at communication: A review. Modern Language Journal 66, 274-83.
30. Magnan, S. 1987: Legal caveats on communicative proficiency testing for graduation requirements or teacher certification. In Valdman, A., editor, 1987: 45-50.
31. Morello, J. 1988: Attitudes of students of French toward required language study. Foreign Language Annals 21, 435-42.
32. Nichols, J. 1988: Language study, international study, and education. Profession 88 (MLA), 10-17.
33. Omaggio, A. 1986: Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
34. Reschke, C. 1985: Proficiency based foreign language teacher certification: The Texas Project. ADFL Bulletin 16, 17-21.
35. Savignon, S. 1985: The evaluation of communicative competence: The ACTFL provisional proficiency guidelines. Modern Language Journal 69, 129-34.
36. Schulz, R. 1988: Proficiency-based foreign language requirements: A plan for action. ADFL Bulletin 19, 24-28.
37. Shohamy, E. 1983: Rater reliability of the oral interview speaking test. Foreign Language Annals 16, 219-22.
38. Valdman, A., editor 1987: Proceedings of the symposium on the evaluation of foreign language proficiency Bloomington: Indiana University.