Politeness and Forms of Address

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1991, Pages 145-168

  Wood, Linda A ^a   Kroger, Rolf O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970174643     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X91103001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brown, R. (1965) Social Psychology. New York: Free Press.
3. Brown, R. (1987) Theory of politeness: An exemplary case. Invited address to Society of Experimental Social Psychologists, October.
4. Brown, R. and Ford, M. (1961) Address in American English. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62, 375-385.
5. Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1989) Politeness theory and Shakespeare's tragedies. Language in Society 18, 159-212.
7. Craig, R. T., Tracy, K. and Spisak, F. (1986) The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research 12, 437-468.
8. Durkheim, E. (1915) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: Allen and Unwin.
9. Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
10. Harre, R. (1979) Social Being. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Goffman, E. (1983) Personal Being. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Kroger, R. O. (1982) Explorations in ethogeny: With special reference to the rules of address. American Psychologist 37, 810-820.
13. Kroger, R. O., Cheng, K. and Leong, I. (1979) Are the rules of address universal? A test of Chinese usage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 10, 395-414.
14. Kroger, R. O. and Wood, L. A. (1991) Forms of address andpoliteness theory: The FreudJung correspondence. In preparation.
15. Kroger, R. O. and Wood, L. A. (in press) Are the rules of address universal? IV: Comparison of Chinese, Korean, Greek and German usage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
16. Kroger, R. O., Wood, L. A. and Beam, T. (1984) Are the rules of address universal? II. Greek usage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 15, 259-272.
17. Kroger, R. O., Wood, L. A. and Kim, U. (1984) Are the rules of address universal? III. Comparison of Chinese, Greek and Korean usage. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 15, 273-284.
18. Slugoski, B. R. and Turnbull, W. (1988) Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7, 101-121.
19. Tracy, K. (1990) The many faces of facework. In H. Giles and W. P. Robinson (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley.
20. Turnbull, C. H. (1973) The Mountain People. New York: Simon and Schuster.
21. Wood, L. A. and Ryan, E. B. (in press) Talk to elders: Social structure, attitudes and forms of address. Ageing and Society.