Feminist Grounded Theory: An Exploration of the Congruency and Tensions between Two Traditions in Knowledge Discovery

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 125-137

  Wuest, Judith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970147048     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973239500500109     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Acker, J., Barry, K., & Essevald, J. (1991). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. In M. Fonow & J. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Allen, K., & Baber, K. (1992). Ethical and epistemological tensions in applying a postmodern perspective to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 1-15.
3. Baker, C., Wuest, J., & Stern, P. N. (1992). Method slurring: The grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 1355-1360.
4. Campbell, J., & Bunting, S. (1991). Voices and paradigms: Perspectives on critical and feminist theory in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 1-15.
5. Chenitz, W. C., & Swanson, J. (1986). Qualitative research using grounded theory. In W. C. Chenitz & J. M. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing (pp. 3-15). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.
8. Cotterill, P. (1992). Interviewing women: Issues of friendship, vulnerability, and power. Women's Studies International Forum, 15, 593-606.
9. DeVault, M. (1990). Talking and listening from women's standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37, 96-115.
10. Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
12. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
13. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
14. Hall, J., & Stevens, P. (1991). Rigor in feminist research. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 16-29.
15. Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana Press.
16. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Hawkesworth, M. (1989). Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth. Signs, 14, 533-557.
18. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
19. Lowenberg, J. (1993). Interpretive research methodology: Broadening the dialogue. Advances in Nursing Science, 16, 57-69.
20. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30-61). London: Routledge.
21. Opie, A. (1992). Qualitative research, appropriation of 'other” and empowerment. Feminist Review, 40, 52-69.
22. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford.
23. Rigor, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist, 47, 730-740.
24. Scott, J. (1990). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or uses of the poststructuralist theory for feminism. In M. Hirsch & E. Fox Keller (Eds.), Conflicts in feminism (pp. 134-148). New York: Routledge.
25. Shields, V. R., & Dervin, B. (1993). Sense-making in feminist social science research: A call to enlarge the methodological options of feminist studies. Women's Studies International Forum, 16, 65-81.
26. Stern, P. N. (1980). Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. Image, 12(1), 20-23.
27. Stern, P. N. (1985). Using grounded theory method in nursing research. En M. Leininger (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing (pp. 149-160). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
28. Stern, P. N. (1994). Eroding grounded theory. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research (pp. 212-223). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Stern, P. N., & Pyles, S. (1986). Using grounded theory methodology to study women's culturally based decisions about health. In P. N. Stem (Ed.), Women, health, and culture (pp. 1-24). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
30. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Swanson, J. (1986). The formal qualitative interview for grounded theory. In W. C. Chenitz & J. M. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing (pp. 66-78). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
33. Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3-11.
34. Thorne, S. (1991). Methodological orthodoxy in qualitative nursing research: Analysis of issues. Qualitative Health Research, 1, 178-199.