Democracy and Territoriality

Millennium - Journal of International Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1991, Pages 463-484

  Connolly, William E ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970135659     PISSN: 03058298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/03058298910200030301     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. J. Rousseau, On the Social Contract With Gen Manuscript and Polnunt f.i Roger Masters ted.) and Judith Masters Trans (New York St Martin's Press 1978. Book I. p 46 discuss this quotation in the context of Rouscrau's general thought on Political Theirs and Modernity (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1998).ch I
2. P. Ricoeur. The Political Paradox’, in William E. Connolly (ed) (New York: New York University Press. 1984) p 254.
3. The classic response is advanced by Peter Bachrach. The Theory of Democratic Flitism A Critique (Boston, MA: Little Brown. 1967)
4. Other critiques can be found in William E. Connolly (ed.), The Bios of Pluralism (New York: Atherton Press, 1969). especially the essays by Arnold Kaufman and David Keuler.
5. Joseph Schumpeter. Capitalism Socialism and Democratory (New York: Harper and Row. 1942), p. 257.
6. M. Wolzer, ‘Liberalism and the An of Separation’, Political Theory (August 1944). p. 321.
7. M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983), p. 289.
8. Thomas L. Dumm has advanced this effort impressively in Democracy and Punishment (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. 1987).
9. John H. Herz, International Politics in the Atomic Age (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959).
10. Herz, The Territorial State Revisited Reflexions on the Future of the Nation State. Po (Fall 1968), p 15.