Action-Implicative Discourse Analysis

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue , 1995, Pages 195-215

  Tracy, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84970133345     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X95141011     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1987). Communication research: Issues and methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: MacMillon.
3. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Atkinson, P. (1988). Ethnomethodology: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 441-466.
5. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bochner, A. (1985). Perspectives on inquiry: Representation, conversation, and reflection. In. M. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 27-58). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Bochner, A. (1994). Perspectives on inquiry II: Perspectives and stories. In. M. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 21-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Bostrom, R., & Donohew, L. (1992). The case for empiricism: Clarifying fundamental issues in communication theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 109-129.
9. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Burman, E., & Parker, I. (Eds.). (1993). Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action. London: Routledge.
11. Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage.
12. Craig, R. T. (1989). Communication as a practical discipline. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues (pp. 97-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K (in press). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory.
14. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
15. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-168.
17. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
19. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper & Row.
20. Gumperz, J. J. (1982a). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Gumperz. J. J. (Ed.). (1982b). Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interest. Boston: Beacon.
23. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1993). Language as ideology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
24. Hopper, R., Koch, S., & Mandelbaum, J. (1986). Conversation analysis methods. In D. G. Ellis & W A. Donohue (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 169-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Kress, G., & Hodge, R. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27. LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.
28. Mishler, E. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. N. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). New York: Academic Press.
30. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
31. Sacks, H. (1992a). Lectures on conversation: Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Sacks, H. (1992b). Lectures on conversation: Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
34. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 191-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
36. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.
38. Shotter, J., & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.). (1989). Texts of identity. London: Sage.
39. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
41. Taylor, C. (1987). Interpretation and the sciences of man. In P. Rabinow & W. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social science: A second look (pp. 33-82). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
42. Tompkins, P K. (1994). Principles of rigor for assessing evidence in “qualitative” communication research. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 44-50.
43. Tracy, K. (1991). Discourse. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 179-196). New York: Guilford.
44. Tracy, K. (1995). Colloquium: Dilemmas and discourse practices of academic discussion. Manuscript in preparation.
45. Tracy, K, & Baratz, S. (1993). Intellectual discussion in the academy as situated discourse. Communication Monographs, 60, 300-320.
46. Tracy, K., & Carjuzaa, J. (1993). Identity enactment in intellectual discussion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 171-194.
47. Tracy, K., & Muller, N. (1994). Talking about ideas: Academics' beliefs about appropriate communicative practices. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 319-349.
48. Tracy, K., & Naughton, J. (in press). The identity work of questioning in intellectual discussion. Communication Monographs.
49. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985a). Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 1. Disciplines of discourse. London. Academic Press.
50. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985b). Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 2. Dimensions of discourse. London. Academic Press.
51. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985c). Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 3. Discourse and dialogue. London. Academic Press.
52. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985d). Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 4. Discourse analysis in society. London. Academic Press.
53. van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. van Dijk, T. A. (1993a). Editor's forward to critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 131-132.
55. van Dijk, T. A. (1993b). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 249-283.
56. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model directed toward solving conflicts of opinion. Dordecht, Holland: Foris.
57. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
58. Yamada, H. (1992). American and Japanese business discourse: A comparison of interactional styles. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.