Support for electronic cigarette regulations among California voters

Tobacco Control

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 334-337

  Unger, Jennifer B ^a   Barker, Dianne ^b   Baezconde Garbanati, Lourdes ^a   Soto, Daniel W ^a   Sussman, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Barker Bi Coastal Health Consultants   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CALIFORNIA; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLITICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SMOKING; SMOKING BAN; TAX; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALIFORNIA; COMMERCE; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLITICS; SMOKE-FREE POLICY; SMOKING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TAXES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84970027888     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052918     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Delnevo CD, Giovenco DP, Steinberg MB, et al. Patterns of electronic cigarette use among adults in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:715-19.
2. Farsalinos KE, Le Houezec J. Regulation in the face of uncertainty: the evidence on electronic nicotine delivery systems (e-cigarettes). Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2015;8:157-67.
3. McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;12:CD010216.
4. Leventhal AM, Strong DR, Kirkpatrick MG, et al. Association of electronic cigarette use with initiation of combustible tobacco product smoking in early adolescence. JAMA 2015;314:700-7.
5. Schneider S, Diehl K. Vaping as a catalyst for smoking? An initial model on the initiation of electronic cigarette use and the transition to tobacco smoking among adolescents. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:647-53.
6. Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. States and municipalities with laws regulating use of electronic cigarettes. http://no-smoke.org/pdf/ecigslaws.pdf (accessed11-15,2015).
7. Mello S, Bigman CA, Sanders-Jackson A, et al. Perceived harm of secondhand electronic cigarette vapors and policy support to restrict public vaping: results from a national survey of US adults. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:686-93.
8. Tan AS, Lee CJ, Bigman CA. Public support for selected e-cigarette regulations and associations with overall information exposure and contradictory information exposure about e-cigarettes: findings from a national survey of U.S. adults. Prev Med 2015;81:268-74.
9. Wackowski OA, Delnevo CD. Smokers’ attitudes and support for e-cigarette policies and regulation in the USA. Tob Control 2015;24:543-6.
10. Blendon RJ, Gil G, Benson JM, et al. Americans’ perspectives on e-cigarettes. https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/94/2015/11/Stat-Harvard-Poll-Oct-2015-Americans-Perspectives-on-E-Cigarettes.pdf (accessed 16. Nov 2015).
11. Rogers T. The California Tobacco Control Program: introduction to the 20-year retrospective. Tob Control 2010;19(Suppl 1):i1-2.
12. Roeseler A, Burns D. The quarter that changed the world. Tob Control 2010;19: (Suppl 1):i3-15.
13. Collins LM, Lanza ST. Latent class and latent transition analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Wiley, 2010.
14. Studlar DT, Cairney P. Conceptualizing punctuated and non-punctuated policy change: tobacco control in comparative perspective. Int Rev Adm Sci 2014;80:513-31.